Why do you hate God?

0/10

But there's evidence all around you. Nature itself, and you.

wtf im christian now

>he doesn't wanna summon the four Infernal Principalities and force them to sign a contract to you, instead of the other way around, ensuring you a rank in the Infernal peerage after the Morning Star hurls the celestial thieves down from paradise

which god?

I don't. Actually, I don't believe he exists at all.

for shit and giggles

>I don't want to sell my soul to the devil
Sounds about right.

Unlike you, I think eternity is more important than this temporary short life.

>I ignore the importance of my own life because I've convinced myself of an eternity beyond it.

Yeah, that sounds about right.

I don't

What are you talking about?

After The Great Dragon throws the returned christ into the Lake of Fire like the impotent cripple that he is we'll be coexisting in Eternity together, for unlike your petty and vindictive god, we'll open the bejeweled gates of the Golden Cube of New Jerusalem to ALL denizens of Earth, sharing the Waters of Life with ALL people and faiths.

Uhh, we don't.

Only communists and relativists hate God.

Except that's wrong.

This life is of utmost importance, because the choices you make here will have eternal consequences.

This is why God-fearing Christian America was all about individuality, freedom, family values and rights.

It is atheist states such as the USSR that was collectivist, depressing and treated human life like it's nothing.

>this is what delusional Freemasons/Luciferians believe

youtube.com/watch?v=S-SzIJngWqE

I can't hate something I don't believe in.

Except that's not the case at all. The freest and most human life valuing nations on the planet are the most secular. Also in a Christian worldview, the ultimate life is one in which you get hit by a bus after attaining a state of grace, since your life is just a waiting room for eternity.

>he still thinks there's any hope of a victory for Christ the Leper-Messiah in the Valley of Megiddo

Bottom zozzle.

youtube.com/watch?v=wyz5ql87ls4

Is that why the 20th century is the most nihilistic, destructive and bloody century in history?

Is that why, as Christianity is becoming less popular in the west, chaos and degeneracy and immorality is becoming the norm?

>Bible
Life is important, family is important, your behavior has consequences.

>Darwin
"lol just do whatever u want, we're all animals"

>chaos and degeneracy and immorality is becoming the norm
citation needed

Deep as shit

Have you been paying attention to what has been happening the last 10 years in America and Europe?

Seems like you live under a rock.

>Is that why the 20th century is the most nihilistic, destructive and bloody century in history?

The early portion of it, which coincidentally was also when it was at its most religious.

>Is that why, as Christianity is becoming less popular in the west, chaos and degeneracy and immorality is becoming the norm?

You mean the west in which violent crime has been plummeting and every metric of education and prosperity has been steadily increasing?

>Life is important, family is important, your behavior has consequences.

Wrong. The only thing important in a Christian worldview is attaining grace and then dying in that state of grace.

>Have you been paying attention to what has been happening the last 10 years in America and Europe?
>he fell for the media meme

You're saturated in sensationalist media. Look at the actual statistic behind it.

>20th century
>most religious

Confirmed for bait

youtube.com/watch?v=VjWakBmGWm4

is this post ironic

God killed my family and I don't like that kind of thing.

The early portion of the 20th century was its most religious point, which is also where its bloodiest wars came about (by the way, I don't attribute these to religion or the fact we haven't had a similarly destructive war since due to religion's decline in the west, war is driven by material geo-politics). It was only as a result of various post-ww2 counter-cultures that religion began a serious and rapid decline in the west.

I'm guessing you would prefer to live in a more righteous time, perhaps the Middle Ages, or in somewhere moral like Saudi Arabia?

youtube.com/watch?v=uqcTVVUFnKQ

If the abrahamic version of a divinity exists, it's terrifying. He's been known to torture people for innocuous reasons and promote unspeakable evil, if it's done in his name. Also cruelty seems to be the default for the natural competition between the beings in nature

That said, if there is a god, which I very much doubt, most religions out there do him a massive disservice. Do you honestly think that the creator of all the trillions upon trillions of galaxies would ever give a shit about whether or not you masturbate?

>SJWs
>Regressive Left
>Homosexuality
>Transvestites
>Feminism
>Cultural Marxism
>Rise of Neo-Paganism
>Rise of New Age occultism
>Low IQ niggers rioting
>Government shitting on the constitution
>Police federalized with military equipment
>Destruction of freedom
>Destruction of national sovereignty
>Destruction of family unit
>Destruction of morals, values and ethics
>Moral relativism
>Good is evil, evil is good
>NSA spying on you
>Freedom being encroached on
>Anti-Gun agenda
>Clueless millenials falling for socialism
>Murder of innocent babies
>Rampant propaganda and deception
>Multiculturalism
>Despite living in the information age, people are dumber than ever
do i need to go on?

we live in a orwellian, post-modern "brave new world"

and all of this has been foretold in the book of revelation. we live in a antichrist culture.

>Sacrificing children to the fire
>innocent

>Having sex with animals and creating abominations
>innocent

>Talking blasphemy about the Creator
>innocent

>Delving into the occult, witchcraft and divination
>innocent

You have no problem bombing ISIS but here you are being a bleeding-heart cry baby when it comes to ancient savages being killed off.

>antichrist culture
youtube.com/watch?v=Htl3XWUhUOM

>and all of this has been foretold in the book of revelation. we live in a antichrist culture.

Oh, you're a crazy person that can't be reasoned with. Thank you for making figuring that out so easy.

>asks for citation
>gets BTFO
>"lol u r just dum!!"

Not an argument, you lost.

Half of these things have absolutely nothing to do with godlessness, and were more prevalent in the past.

>citation
>provides no data, just spews some talking points and then reveals his powerlevel at the end

Yeah. I sure dun got BTFO.

I don't understand why people act like a singular all-powerful creator god is common sense. For most of humanity's theistic history, people were polytheistic and generally separated creator deities from other deities, and gave each deity limited scope and powers. You must have all been brainwashed by Jews or something.

No, vague predictions built on Barnum Statements, are a mainstay of pretty much all religious cults since time immemorial. I'm not the poster you were arguing against, but I will certainly agree with him that you're insane if you believe that your particular brand of horseshit vague statements have any real basis.

You're retarded.

Ey Thoth, you ever consider starting a blog or something?

still no arguments.

thanks for agreeing with my post, glad we could come to a common conclusion

You're a terrible troll. Apply yourself.

He killed children for making fun of a bald man! As a previous poster pointed out. He was and is a sadist, even to this day. If he would truly exist most people would be tortured for all eternity, for relatively innocuous things. How is that sensible?

Many times, and other projects, but at some point it seems utterly futile.

youtube.com/watch?v=JvMXVHVr72A
youtube.com/watch?v=8Uee_mcxvrw
youtube.com/watch?v=AIXUgtNC4Kc

>repeatedly states his worldview without factual information
>thinks this is an argument

ITT: Atheists getting BTFO and Told

Perhaps if you repeat it enough it will be true... Deus Vult!

Oh come on now. He's religious. He doesn't have to repeat it for it to be true, he just has to believe it really, really hard.

I find that ironic coming from an evolutionist.

You have more faith than me!

>he thinks I don't believe in God
No, I Believe, I just won't stop until he's nailed up on the cross a second time, to pay for his own sins this time.

youtube.com/watch?v=K8nrF5aXPlQ

Keep trying. You'll eventually get under my skin. In the meantime, trolololo.

aaaaaand he's lost my ability to even remotely consider him seriously. Evolution has mountains of evidence backing it, and has been used as an engineering concept to come up with better designs. Furthermore medicine is more or less built on that principle.

I digress though, you're either a shitty troll or just willfully ignorant.

Facts don't care about your feelings.

"It does not please [you] that I've placed Man among the Anthropomorpha, perhaps because of the term 'with human form', but man learns to know himself. Let's not quibble over words. It will be the same to me whatever name we apply. But I seek from you and from the whole world a generic difference between man and simian that [follows] from the principles of Natural History. I absolutely know of none. If only someone might tell me a single one! If I would have called man a simian or vice versa, I would have brought together all the theologians against me. Perhaps I ought to have by virtue of the law of the discipline."

>I digress though, you're either a shitty troll or just willfully ignorant.

Why not both?

>Evolution has mountains of evidence backing it up

0/10 poor bait

looks like you're still asshurt from the 2 threads yesterday that debunked evolutionism

>Evolution has mountains of evidence backing it

..Such as?

So, guys, what's YOUR strategy for rioting against the perfection of God's creation?

I preach Gnostic texts to mainline Christians who evangelize at me, in order to erode their faith canon scripture, and of course I'm always willing to offer occult initiations to my friends.

>2 Veeky Forums threads debunked evolutionism
huge if true

Likewise to you, friend.

At the risk of looking like an idiot, who is the guy on the left?

No, scientists years ago have debunked evolutionism.

>So, guys, what's YOUR strategy for rioting against the perfection of God's creation?

I live my life as I see fit; not much else is really needed.

Matthew 7:3

Still waiting for this "evidence".

>"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the law, love under will."
~To Mega Therion, the Great and Wild Beast 666, the earthly vehicle of The Scarlet Woman of the Apocalypse and Saint of Harlotry.

don't bother, atheists dont have any proof.

they think shouting "evolution is true!!" enough times will make it reality

Carl Linnaeus. Creator of the taxonomic system that we still use today (albeit with heavy modification). Even though he's what one would define as a "creationist," I use that term loosely, due to the fact that he considered humans and simians (anything from chimps to tarsiers) part of the same genus, or "kind."

The lake of fire is your destination.

Why is the denial of evolution mainly an American phenomenon? Unless it's a theocratic third world shithole I can't think of a single other country that just outright dismisses it...

fossils? the adaptation of germs to our means of combating them? Speciation? Darwin's moth? Adaptations to best fit their environment, which happens within a generation? Just to name a few...

in the slight chance you're not baiting:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent

HERE'S THE STATE OF EVOLUTION TODAY: "Evolutionary theory itself is already in a state of flux… all the central assumptions of the Modern Synthesis (often also called Neo-Darwinism) have been disproven" - Professor Denis Noble, Evolutionist, Physiologist and Biologist, May 2013

1. Abiogenesis. They have given up on it and now say it's not part of evolution theory.
2. They are now admitting that they have no explanation for diversity. So now it's not evolution either.
3. They have given up on the fossil record since it looks like creation. So now they say they don't need the fossils.
4. Gould and associates say there is no gradualism (no transitionals). Stasis is the underlying factor in the fossils so it's not evolution either.
5. Random mutations and natural selection produce nothing so that's out too and they are rejecting it as evolution.
6. All they have left is the common ancestor monkey. The inability for "kinds" to interbreed destroys that one so it's not long for this world.
7. PE is now a failure so it's out as evolution as well.
8. The “tree of life” has also been rejected.

>moth
I think you mean finches, but referred to the peppered moths.

Depends on what you mean by God.

Personal God? With an arbitrary personality and cultural goals? Don't believe in that.

Pantheistic "All?" Can't really hate that, as it includes myself and everyone and everything I love.

Thou art God, at any rate.

>Carl Linnaeus. Creator of the taxonomic system that we still use today (albeit with heavy modification).

Thanks. I've seen that picture posted all over the place around here in religion threads, but hadn't had the opportunity to stick around and wait for an answer to that question until today.

No, that's your False Prophet's destination after we annihilate the Armies of the Lord across the windswept scrublands of Megiddo.

Again, unlike your vindictive """Son of God""" we're going to let all of humanity enjoy the fruits of New Jerusalem.

That's an interpretation.

You view things that look similar and *assume* they have a common ancestor.

Common designer is a completely valid option aswell.

Yeah, most of those were me.

>Parents were raised in the equivalent of Alabama of their country
>both bible thumping hicks
>spent my entire childhood at church
>grew to resent the book
>was never allowed to play with other kids, enjoy cartoons, or run around outside
>tfw I know the bible better than I know myself
>was socially retarded for the longest time until I grew out of it

"Kids"

> rioting against the perfection of God´s creation
creation can´t be perfect, if it was perfect there wouldn´t be change. A totally perfect equilibrium means a petrified image, death

No, Darwin predicted that there had to be a moth with a very specific tongue based on the fact that there was a flower that had a very specific form

You're outright misrepresenting some arguments. The most glaring of which is the fact that you're ignoring the existence of punctuated equilibrium entirely, hence the Gould comment among others on that list. Also, nice pasta

Hey, what do you think of Stirner? I know he's not an occultist philosopher in the slightest, but he's still one of my favourite thinkers.

>nice pasta
We're lucky he hasn't spammed the thread with 75 rapid fire copy/pastes.

>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanthopan_morgani

Darwin's moth

Because he created and continues to allow suffering and evil

>Fossils
How? Be specific. The fossil record disproves evolution. There should be millions of transitional forms, yet there are zero.

>adaptation of germs to our means of combating them
Already debunked, check the article on trueorigins.org.

I can slice off your feet and you'll be immune to foot diseases, that isn't evolution. You're losing things, not gaining.

>Speciation
Variation within kinds is not evolution. Dogs produce dogs.

>Darwin's moth
Variation. To correlate micro with macro evolution is a huge stretch, and evolutionists constantly blur the lines on purpose.

One is observable fact.
The other is wild speculation.

>Adaptations to best fit their environment
Natural Selection is actually in favour of creationism, not evolutionism. It selects, it's not a driving force.

Where do you draw the distinction? Even Richard Owen, a devout theist, viewed life as having arisen from "archetypes" or basal forms. Here, we see several representatives of each major vertebrate group, along with man. That little thing that looks like a worm in the upper right hand corner is the vertebrate archetype.