/tv/

ITT: movies that made your blood boil from historical inaccuracy

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WvIn3PgCHJU
youtube.com/watch?v=rObSWkQA7og
youtu.be/XSoG7m1V6aw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I forgot about that movie but I remember wanting to see it. Was it at least good from a pop corny Hollywood way?

Right? Moses should have been a KANG!
After all the title of the movie is gods and KANGZ and yet I don't see any KANGZ there.

...

Every movie dat portray da ancien gypshins as white people

>Exodus
>Noah
>Ben-hur remake
Whats up with the latest trend to make biblical movies and turn them into retarded action flicks?

300
That triggers me everytime

Normies ruin everything. If classical art was meant for the public at large we would have never known excelence.

>versailles
>series funded by feminist french goverment

Louis XIV is a SJW and cares about the common people.
Louis XIV literrallly gets cucked by a midget nigger servant in the second episode. His brother is somehow transgender and suffers from discrimination, because he wants to lead armies but the militaries are such bigots

Also of course they put in a strong independant woman who has to hide her medical talent because she'd be burned as a witch.

I wish i was making this up but this literally all happened in the first 4 episodes. PC culture ruins everthing

That's soviet tier brainwashing.

troy at least felt like the illiad

it wouldnt be surprising if it was made under the same philosophy as the 13th warrior

>tell the ancient story without supernatural elements

I just hope they fucking forget about Odysseus and don't even try to make a fucking normie version. Leave ancient mythology alone you fuckers! Do only comics movies for the rest of your lives!

Is there any historical movie that got succesful and famous and isn't rife with outrageous inaccuracies and contemporary narratives forced upon the plot?

homer is the basic classic equivalent of a comic book

Can't compare. The epics embodied the culture of a people. They were used to educate the next generations in the language, grammar as well as the moral values that the culture wanted to preserve and pass forward.

Comic books are just low brow entertainment.

Recent but Argo.

300

Alexander Nevsky.

>implying
Didn't you see how recent Marvel comics were full of the most shallow, low-quality interpretations of contemporary leftist values?

Yeah but this is cultural subversion. Homer was cultural preservation.

>recent
They were always like that. You forget that comics were literally created by the Jews.

Exodus is a myth, it can't be "historically inaccurate" because the events described never happened.

Also this. Captain America is literally shabbos goy: the Comic.
>fight le evil natzees for us, goyim; meanwhile we take control of your media and flood your children with pornography and Cultural Marxism

You're pedantic. You can have a movie about King Arthur and still be historically innacurate. See

The guy that gave the serum that turned Steven what's his name into Captain America was literally a Jew.

youtube.com/watch?v=WvIn3PgCHJU

Literal propaganda combined with pulp shite.

I liked the 97' miniseries, but I think they changed the of some events, like his whole crew got killed by Scylla and Charybdis instead of drowning.

I was appalled by the treatment of the Battle of Philippi in HBO's Rome. Quite an ignoble way to rewrite the deaths of Cassius and Brutus.

>in the second episode.
What.

I enjoyed it, but it's not good because of the history though since it is solely based on the Biblical summary of events.

>You can have a movie about King Arthur and still be historically innacurate.

No, you can't. You can have a King Arthur movie that is true to the source material or not, but not one that is "historically accurate".

Fuck those cucks, they damn near destroyed Rome and handed an Empire not to a tolerant populist like Julius but to a sociopath like Augustus.

I liked it but they really only glorified Achilles slaughtering Trojans. No one else really gets time to shine and Priam is made to look like a retard. 4/10 Hector doesn't smash the Greek walls down with a boulder, Ares doesn't get BTFO and Achilles doesn't clog the Scamander with bodies.

>Talking shit about Augustus
You best be on your way to Parthia about now

t. buttblasted atheist mad that the bible is true

Nothing wrong with sociopaths, but the way the Empire turned out under Augustus is probably quite different than it would have been under Caesar.

Besides, King Arthur is based on a real part of history, Exodus is a fairy tale with no basis in reality whatsoever. It was written as propaganda to explain the Egyptian origins of Moses and the privileges the Levites granted themselves over the other tribes by crediting them with "saving" the other tribes from captivity.

Zulu

At least Brutus did it to save the republic.

You can have a completely fictional character, say pharaoh wewuz the kang of Egypt. If your storyline happens in Ancient Egypt and then there's someone parading on a fucking Mercedez Benz in the middle of the streets of Cairo then your story is historically inaccurate. I guess the exact word would be verisimilitude, but the again you have to be extremely pedantic or autistic to not get the meaning of what I'm saying.

Watched it, good suggestion, thanks.
I could swear at least 20 times during the movie that I've seen THAT redcoat in monthy python, do Brits all look and sound the same?

Apocalypto

300

good taste

>America working together with Finland to fight Russia in 1941
WHYYY

But the ending scene never happened

You guys realize they aren't going for accuracy?

It could have been good but the pacing was fucked up. Ridely got cucked by the studio and the final product was a mess.

Go on....

Was it this movie : youtube.com/watch?v=rObSWkQA7og ?

White people will go extinct in 100 years.

Feels Good Man

Gladiator
Pretty good kino but twisting history like that was meh.

>kingdom of heaven

This complete turd of a film.

>Battle of Stirling Bridge, in empty field, no Stirling, no river, no bridge, no Scottish ambush trapping a third of the English army in a swamp.

>Wallace laid siege to York. Just no, he never got that far and was contented with not trying to capture heavily fortified positions.

>Weird love interest with Edward II's wife. Nope, she wouldn't even have been 10 yet.

> The whole bs about Wallace being the sole Scottish commander, give Andrew Murray some credit!

There are only three bits in this film that are properly correct:

1. William Wallace is in it.
2. William Wallace dies at the end.
3. Edward I is a dick (although lets forget about the whole Prima Nocta nonsense).

Kingdom of Heaven

Christians are comically evil and Saladin is comically good. It's too aware of modern politics and it needlessly attempts to make some sort of parallel to modern times.

It had its bad spots, but good ones too:
youtu.be/XSoG7m1V6aw

It's Jacobite tell propaganda cranked to 11. I personally view it as "the romantic legend" Braveheart. I mean, all the shit you post and you don't even mention the anachronistic kilts or "lol dudes what if we make pikes, the English have never seen that". While most things they changed on purpose, Stirling was altered for budget reasons: they didn't have the money for a bridge at that point. At least it isn't SJWS crap like KoH.

/pol/ idiots exagerating as ever...