>[Open] How many times did we tell you to not make threads if you can't do it right? fucking newfags Also >Veeky Forums op
James Scott
HISTORY!
Nolan Hughes
WHAT DOES THE EMPEROR BID?
William Reyes
Nth for the Internationale
Isaiah Bennett
[Open] is better than EMBED EMBED EMBED EMBED
Joshua Moore
First for elf penis
Jose Nguyen
No it isn't
Brandon Diaz
Nobody looks at the OP.
Nathaniel Miller
Its the same fuck up. What are you saying?
Isaiah Sanders
Did we ever get that lewd story? The one with the dark elf and the empire regiment
Grayson Johnson
Are all the Elf races the same physiologically? Like if you did a baby swap between the three areas would the adults grow up to be noticeably different?
Connor Davis
When will Arena take off?
Jackson Hernandez
They impale her on a pike and plant it on the side of the road. The end. Now kill yourself
David Collins
When it's remade into gachakino
Blake Russell
Reminder that Total War gameplay ONLY simulates field battles with freedom of maneuvre well, and that aside from a handful of meme battles ALL decisive battles have been field battles. Keep Total War fun, keep non-field blob battles in TW to a minimum.
Objective list of decisive non-field battles (note skirmishes do not count, this isn't Mountain Blade) >Marathon (Chokepoint) >Teutenburg (Forest ambush) >Roliça (Gunpowder-era hills battle) >Milvian Bridge (Bridge chokepoints) Every other decisive battle: >Field
Thomas Reyes
No need to be so hostile
Jordan Moore
>when you're so butthurt about being called autistic that you take your shit into the next thread Unironically weak shit user. At least other idiots have the decency to leave their shit in the last thread.
Christian Howard
I N D E P E N D E N C E
total war doesn't simulate shit, stop shitposting teethman.
Samuel Diaz
...
Kayden Phillips
Dark Elves: >Dark hair or Platinum Blonde with milky pale white skin High Elves: >Blonde hair with healthy skin glow Wood Elves: >Red heads with freckles
Aside from that they're the same
Ryan Kelly
>yeth i am acthually well-versed in the wayth of hiththory, one of my favorite hobbieth is playing total war(tm) gaymes. i even have a roman helmeth in my room back home
Eli Martinez
I've said it before and I say it again: you're a retard. TW is not a simulator by any margin, and field battles are the most boring of them all. Also cherrypicking "decisive" battles of history, holds absolutely no water in an abstract video game in which 99% of player battles and actions are non-historical anyway.
Jayden Watson
Man, I would love to play a full on gommie empire rebels factions
Angel Ross
I actually know the user in rl(yes, he's annoying) and you've described him down to a tee.
Owen Wood
The crusade will not end until chokepoint battles have been toned down and stupid forest maps have been eliminated
Charles Taylor
Nice, actually got a chance to win with the reinforcements coming in here.
Owen Scott
Stirling Bridge Persepolis The Granicus Arcole Myalostravets Chancellorsville Shenandoah Valley Beth Horon Zhuge Liang's valley campaigns Calderon The several battles of the Trebbia Tenochtitlan
t. historyboo who only plays warhammer and looking forward to ancient empires for Attila. Keep your wall-climbing simulators and clone wars to yourselves, teethmen.
Matthew Jackson
You're just wrong. Total War is a tactical battlefield simulator with rudimentary strategy gameplay. Nothing more. Field battles are what the simulator does well and are fun. Chokepoint battles are blob mashers that bore to tears.
Jordan Wilson
Wrong thread, friend.
Sebastian Stewart
>historyboo cringe
Matthew Adams
>cringe cringe
Jason Collins
He's not wrong
Easton Hernandez
>simulator there's that meme again. you can repeat it as much as you want, but you are still a person who's 100% wrong and spergs out about something insignificant on a chinese paintings board, that will never ever change because no one else cares but you.
Jace Howard
>>cringe >cringe cringe
Christopher Campbell
>Worst faction Wow, bad player!
Tyler Ortiz
>no one else cares
Cameron Morgan
He's not wrong. >cherrypicking "decisive" battles of history, holds absolutely no water in an abstract video game in which 99% of player battles and actions are non-historical anyway. Its all fantasy, from the moment you hit "launch game". Might as well make it interesting fantasy.
Levi Walker
*sniffs*
Luke Ward
>>>cringe >>cringe >cringe cringe
Adam Martinez
*raises paw*
Joshua Phillips
>>>cringe >>cringe >cringe >>>/cringe/
Kevin Diaz
Dúghaill genocide soon, fíorgaeil!
Michael Kelly
>>>>cringe >>>cringe >>cringe >cringe cringe
also >>>>cringe >>>cringe >>cringe >>>>/cringe/ cringe
Brayden Thomas
A high-end gobbo army is inferior to all other high-end armies
Gabriel Wright
I know they have differences as adults, my question was if that comes from birth or from their climate? Like I know Helves and Delves can infiltrate each other if they get acclimated for example, but I don't know if they need to do anything other than get used to the climate to make the change
Carter Ward
Wow what a great thread!
This. Its an unwritten rule to keep your sperging in the old thread. Not even commie and cavalry charges posters are this desperate. And quite frankly its being very rude.
Evan Roberts
Do you think anyone ever dabbed during a battle in real history?
Adam Davis
*braps*
Eli Fisher
Hmm, my memory is rusty but I'm digging out some more Hydaspes Albuera Vittoria Arcis sur Aube Valutina Gora Shevardino Berezina Raszyn Heilsberg Bull Run 2nd Murfreesbooroo (Stones River) Most of the Overland campaign
Too lazy to remember anymore. Total war doesn't simulate any kind of real battle
Jayden Brooks
Pic related: you
Jacob Garcia
Probably Ivan IV
Eli Reed
Post kill counts
Benjamin Lopez
Only in *braps list* battles. All others were field battles. Total War *braps* shistorical *braaaps* and it does it well and its fu-*brap*. Excuse me, its fu-*braaaaap*, its f-*brapapapapp*
Colton Evans
>Myalostravets Maloyaroslavets* always fuck up its name. >yfw there are actual mouth-breathing retards in this thread who unironically compare their shitty arcade card game to real history and think they're reenacting history
Evan Bailey
but muh 300!!!
Adrian Scott
obviously someones never played Skarsnik
Austin Adams
user... I'm sorry you ain't got schemes...
Josiah Harris
GOOD post
Daniel Watson
Every post but muh field battle guy and everyone replying to him were me
Oliver Richardson
my post
Joshua Hill
SFO F O
Grayson Rodriguez
Do it again Bomber Birds!
Joseph Phillips
WRONG I posted
Joseph Bailey
Or not
Jordan Baker
FUCK OFF same
Owen Harris
Sorry buddy, but you're not the only one here *unzips field battle*
Joseph Watson
based
Gabriel Carter
me :)
Thomas Watson
...
Alexander Taylor
AbSoLuTeLy BaSeD
Aiden Moore
M-my field is very clean and free of obstacles! Please be gentle!
Hunter Wright
>Stirling Bridge >Persepolis >Calderon Bridge/chokepoint blob battle once every 50 or so for novelty is OK >The Granicus >Arcole >Chancellorsville >Shenandoah Valley >Trebbia Field battles include river next to field or as a field feature >Beth Horon Ambush battle in hills, handled by TW ambush triggers not a normal map for normal battles. Teutenberg forest tier. >Zhuge Liang China >Tenochtitlan Siege battle (or ambush trigger) not a TW open engagement
Note most of these (not including the river field battles) are C list. Red carpet is always field battles. Only four are true set piece chokepoint/bridge battles. Once in a while or for ambush/specific pass triggers is OK. But not every second open battle. Boring blobs.
Wyatt Thompson
SKAVEN
Blake James
More like GAYven
Gabriel Flores
NOOOOOOOOOOOO I've been caught in a FIELD of lies
Michael Brooks
shut up already. youre not reenacting history, no matter how much you want it i bet you play custom battles
James Ward
show me the power of gobbos then
Levi Phillips
LMAO haha
Luke Robinson
I'M FALLING BACK INTO THE FIELDS OF RAPE
Nicholas Hughes
Sheesh, I can almost smell you
Asher Brown
That's autism.
Justin Hill
STAND THE FUCK BACK!
Jackson Gonzalez
Druchii.
Elijah Lewis
I've played these games since rome 1 and never gave two shits about historical accuracy, get fucked nerds.
Behold me, for I am CA's audience. Not you, who complain about changes to the formula and slightest deviations from history on your total war "center", while proudly proclaiming that medieval 2 mods are "still the best". Not you, who bitch about a video game actually introducing a variety of battlefields to keep things fun, because [insert historical nobody that only nerds care about] only fought on some backwater hillbilly cornfield. Not you, who detest fantasy because it rips you out of your historical role playing. Who is Napoleon? Is he a historical figure? No, he's just a video game character wearing the costume I let him wear, fighting uphill battles in the deep forest. Thats all he needs to be.
Hero Units who can take thousands of soldiers by themselves? Naval battles consisting of nothing but ramming? Magical field skills? Keep em coming CA, because they make the games great!
Behold me. The true audience for Total War™
Matthew Davis
My god, I want to like Delves, but i just can't. maybe they need more units first.
Grayson Taylor
Alright I have been putting this off for the entire time you've been doing this, over a month now, atleast. I am really fucking annoyed by this meme. Victoria 2 is a great game, by far the greatest grand strategy of all time, in no other game can you manage an economy, your pops, your diplomacy, your taxes, your army and your sphere of influence at the same time. Victoria 2 takes every element of every game and makes it great. Your pathetic fucking mana/dynasty/OoB/insert single issue game simply can't compete. I've tried playing them, believe me. They are pathetic. You play them and you only have to manage one, maybe, two things. Hah, what is this mess? It's a botched job. A complete write off. And sure, if you like that sort of purile simplistic shit then more power too you, it's not my job to kick down your sandcastle. But why must I spend my time arguing this with you? Just because Victoria 2 is too complex for you doesn't mean it is for everyone. And when challenged you crawl back into your same abhorrent memery, because that's all this is, you don't have the slightest clue what you're saying or who you're messing with, because if you did you'd stop. Go back to playing your blob simulator, little man, because this general belongs to us. The true strategy gamers. Not your lame, disgusting casual shit. And you know the worst part? We can't even meme back. Hell, I'm sure there's some really overpowered trade good in EU4, but we can't say "hurr durr naval supplies" or whatever because the simple fact is nobody has played your favoured game since EU3, back before they dumbed it down for people like you. So well done, my friend, you made an intellectual victoria 2 fan MAD. You've achieved your greatest feat since you formed grossulmiums, mark this on your wall as a victory for your abysmal existence because I can tell you now, kiddo, this is your peak.
Aiden White
>Hydaspes >Vittoria >Valutino >Berezina >Raszyn >Heilsberg Field battles with river feature
>Shevardino Seige battle
>Arcis sur Aube One-in-50 bridge battle
>Bull Run (field with river) >Murfreesbooroo (field with river) Not really a TW era (FOTS?)
Only outlier battle is Albuera. OK some C-list gunpowder battles in the Peninsula War were fought in the hills.
Liam Diaz
Q&A on twitch with Based Thirsty Jack
Brayden Powell
I hope you're satisfied. We were having a good time until you came along.
David Miller
and 99% of tw battles are not even c-list, they're z-list if anything. they're not the historical battles mentioned an never ever happened, and are just "what if" scenarios so its totally fine. stop sperging out and shitting up the thread
Anthony Reyes
Alright, can we put the memes aside for a moment and all agree that, for what it set out to do, HoI4 is a success? It gave us a WWII grandstrat free from all the archaic bullshit of Darkest Hour, and also much easier to get into then HoI3. Can anyone here honestly say they enjoy wasting an hour to fix their OoB every time they start a game of HoI3? Not to mention that, rather than needing to tediously micromanage industry like in other HoI games, HoI4's industry is both streamlined as well as more intuitive than the previous games. Yeah, it's true that HoI4 leads to more "ahistorical" scenarios, but isn't that the point? Why even bother playing the game if the outcome is predetermined form the start? Moreover, from a pure gameplay perspective, giving the player more options, whether they be historical or ahistorical, is a total success. Sure, Mosley ruling Britain never could have happened in reality, but it's fun to have the ability to easily do so in video game form. Overall, I feel that HoI4 is getting a lot of undeserved hate simply because it isn't a total copy of HoI3 with slightly better graphics. Of COURSE the game is different - HoI3 already exists, there would be no point to making the same game again! HoI4 may be different, but that's by design, not by some unforeseen flaw, and it should be celebrated for the changes it made, not hated on.
Ian Sanchez
It's not about historical accuracy it's about fun.
Maps that encourage blobbing are not fun to play constantly. Chokepoint maps spawning every second open battle are shit. 20 vs 20 stacks need room to move. Cav needs open space to move, archers need open space to fire. Yes having some battlefield feautures adds to tactics. But having shit maps that cut off 2/3rd of what the game simulates constantly spawn is trash. Having your campaigns high point battles end in blob mashes is underwhelming, it's the same as cheesing a lord out and have the AI blob around it then hitting it with magic & missiles & encircling.
Don't dick ride CA. Blob battles are not fun except as the odd novelty.