Why do men love war so much?

that's true

probably depends on who you're fighting and where you're fighting though

I think it ultimately boils down if you're winning or not

Because men are biologically built for it, literally: (artofmanliness.com/2016/02/05/how-men-are-evolved-for-fighting-according-to-science/).

>art of manliness

men are naturally more aggressive

>Doesn't bother looking for sources linked the article.
What do they teach you in university nowadays?
cep.ucsb.edu/grads/Sell/(2012) Importance of physical strength.pdf
researchgate.net/publication/235695917_Sex_Differences_and_Intrasexual_Variation_in_Competitive_Confrontation_and_Risk_Taking_An_Evolutionary_Psychological_Perspective
artofmanliness.com/2015/10/25/men-status-the-biological-evolution-of-status/
livescience.com/52562-hands-evolved-for-fighting.html
artofmanliness.com/2014/06/09/semper-virilis-a-roadmap-to-manhood-in-the-21st-century/#switch

what did xhe mean by this

>they just link to more art of memeliness articles

wew lad

Cont:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7724690
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079612308644441
go.redirectingat.com/?id=54126X1301668&site=artofmanliness.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http://www.amazon.com/Fetus-into-Man-Physical-Conception/dp/0674306929&xguid=1d3ea21b2312b469af50f9a6facca37b&xuuid=8b4ebb5f2aca1708c7621f199d657ebc&xsessid=aecbd2ced3a4fcdfbdd7e7981cf13937&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=http://www.artofmanliness.com/2016/02/05/how-men-are-evolved-for-fighting-according-to-science/&pref=http://boards.Veeky Forums.org&xtz=0&abp=1
go.redirectingat.com/?id=54126X1301668&site=artofmanliness.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0395877431/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0395877431&linkCode=as2&tag=stucosuccess-20&linkId=O7CUKAYBYCT4AP6Q&xguid=1d3ea21b2312b469af50f9a6facca37b&xuuid=8b4ebb5f2aca1708c7621f199d657ebc&xsessid=aecbd2ced3a4fcdfbdd7e7981cf13937&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=http://www.artofmanliness.com/2016/02/05/how-men-are-evolved-for-fighting-according-to-science/&pref=http://boards.Veeky Forums.org&xtz=0&abp=1

Cont:
researchgate.net/publication/247233659_Costs_and_benefits_of_fat-free_mass_in_men_Relationship_to_mating_success_dietary_requirements_and_native_immunity
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17875489
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16594792
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468021/
livescience.com/46216-male-faces-evolved-for-fighting.html
>No they aren't, you lazy fucker. :^)

Cont:
go.redirectingat.com/?id=54126X1301668&site=artofmanliness.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http://www.abebooks.com/Sexual-Dimorphism-Human-Mammalian-Biology-Pathology/5204122620/bd&xguid=1d3ea21b2312b469af50f9a6facca37b&xuuid=8b4ebb5f2aca1708c7621f199d657ebc&xsessid=aecbd2ced3a4fcdfbdd7e7981cf13937&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=http://www.artofmanliness.com/2016/02/05/how-men-are-evolved-for-fighting-according-to-science/&pref=http://boards.Veeky Forums.org&xtz=0&abp=1
completehumanperformance.com/athletes-heart-1/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21268467
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2615939
hfs.sagepub.com/content/21/6/687.abstract
go.redirectingat.com/?id=54126X1301668&site=artofmanliness.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http://www.abebooks.com/Sexual-Dimorphism-Human-Mammalian-Biology-Pathology/5204122620/bd&xguid=1d3ea21b2312b469af50f9a6facca37b&xuuid=8b4ebb5f2aca1708c7621f199d657ebc&xsessid=aecbd2ced3a4fcdfbdd7e7981cf13937&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=http://www.artofmanliness.com/2016/02/05/how-men-are-evolved-for-fighting-according-to-science/&pref=http://boards.Veeky Forums.org&xtz=0&abp=1

Cont:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1220811
go.redirectingat.com/?id=54126X1301668&site=artofmanliness.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http://www.abebooks.com/Sexual-Dimorphism-Human-Mammalian-Biology-Pathology/5204122620/bd&xguid=1d3ea21b2312b469af50f9a6facca37b&xuuid=8b4ebb5f2aca1708c7621f199d657ebc&xsessid=aecbd2ced3a4fcdfbdd7e7981cf13937&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=http://www.artofmanliness.com/2016/02/05/how-men-are-evolved-for-fighting-according-to-science/&pref=http://boards.Veeky Forums.org&xtz=0&abp=1
livescience.com/14223-tall-men-punching-evolution-bipedalism.html

Some links are missing for:
4. Larger lung capacity: so, we will call that spurious.
11. Greater muscle mass and higher muscle-to-fat ratio: and this is a widely known medical fact.

TL;DR:
and just got BTFO.

Anyone can take a pile of books and dump it on a desk as "evidence to support my argument", but it takes skill to actually rephrase it succinctly

Why don't you try again, but this time from your own words?

Was it autism?

My job was burden of proof, I have given proof, it is your burden to read it you negro.

I actually have Asperger's syndrome, so yes, yes I do.

fuck off, be grateful he actually has links rather than pulling it out of his ass like 100% of all Veeky Forums posters

Don't worry, bro, every board (with conversation above white noise) is like this.

They ask for proof.

You give them proof.

They're too lazy to read proof.

They bitch about your proof and DEMAND you dissect it for them because of dyslexia.

You dismantle and offer purified proof.

They pick semantic/grammatical flaw.

Ad infinitum.

So now, I just dump proof and then tell them either read it or don't, all water off a ducks back to me, bro.

seems like it

>I actually have Asperger's syndrome

That actually explains a lot.

>Oh shit, he actually gave proof.
>Fuck, fuck, fuck, I'm about to lose an internet bout.
>I know, I'll call him autistic, that's brilliant.
>A-A-AUTISM!
Whoa, kys, faggot.

I know right? Like why I'm smarter than you. :^)

>I actually have Asperger's syndrome, so yes, yes I do.

well then...

Yes, you have it.

A chance to decisively work for what you believe in, prove yourself to women and wipe out competition

Because when a family gets too large, brothers don't accept birth(rite) of the firstborn or favor of another which ultimately leads to the rise of War-ing Kingdoms. The Crown is passed through patriarchy of the Original House, but the sons Marry Distant Daughters which creates Favor.

t. autist

It's just something we all want to experience

Kind of like watching someone smoke weed vs smoking it yourself

To get away from the nagging of women.

A necessary evil, an inevitable way for us to advance

>pressing buttons and making gooks/sandniggers explode
>real war
Come back when we've actually experienced a furball between modern military craft on both sides or have non-soviet era anti-air shooting at us.

gives them an opportunity to kill rivals
also most of them don't have gfs

>immediate life purpose
>definable, clear goals
>success and failure are easily measurable and usually rewarded/punished
>immediate brotherhood/comraderie
>intense, adrenaline filled experiences
>feel immensely powerful (when things are going well)
>get to play with cool toys
>only time you get to kill without consequence

Pick any or all of those.

>The War Nerd will tell you why
DAMN I FUCKING MISS THAT GUY

exiledonline.com/cat/war-nerd/

ITT We act like sexist female supremacists and make fun of humans with testicles

Edgyness

Because we are cool and women are boring.

TbH the article you outright dismissed was a summary

>but that they loved every second of it and miss it like hell
Wow. That's not the popular opinion you get from most veterans. At least from wars they haven't won. Even from military victories, like the portuguese colonial war, you can get backlash that will last till the winter of your life. I've been reading war accounts by such men.

everyone loves a good war.

whoops

>All the services lie when they’re pushing programs, but the Navy lies most of all. In fact the Navy is the only one of the services that’s actually built around a lie, the carrier group. The carrier group should be renamed “Tomorrow’s Dive Site” because it won’t survive ten minutes in a serious war. Carriers are indefensible, period. That’s why we’re getting this noise about lasers: because even the surface navy, who survive by denying the obvious, have had to face up to the fact that carriers could not survive if they have to rely on their current defenses
Why would you miss a retard who spews such insane bullshit?