Continailures literally cannot refute this (due to their poor grasp of logic)

Continailures literally cannot refute this (due to their poor grasp of logic)

>subscribing to a """""school""""" of logic rather than just utilizing the abstract concept of logic
ISHYGDDT

...

nice strawman

I refute that. Refuted. Pro tip:don't call me continullyis. You won't like me if you do.

Prove logic is a valid tool

...

I wanted to post this but I didn't find it in my "why do this even need to be posted" folder. Thank you user for not being autistic.

>analytic philosophy
*defends PolPot*

Can someone explain the difference for a dummy like me?

>box on the right
>not analytical philosophy

Analytical philosophy was popular in Great Britain while Continental was popular in the rest of Europe. Anglo descendants around the world then popularized analytical philosophy as an "Anglo" philosophy and superior to continental philosophy.

Analytic philosophy focuses more on formal logic and mathematical proof. Continental philosophy focuses more on dialectic relations, subjectivity and phenomenology.

>your post
>not autim

"I'm going to solve the infinitely complex probl of language with numbers!"
Even if you do that, how is that helpful or applicable?
"Haha! Continental troglodyte can't into logic!"

continental philosophy brought the SJWs
analytic philosophy brought the computer age

Actually, continental philosophy was probably the most prominent and effectively critical tradition in regards to the new left. Foucault alone had more criticism of the new left than the entire right wing put together.

Thanks user

Why are you posting a picture of a dead couple?

in what regards did Foucault criticize the new left?
i thought he was a decadent homosexual but maybe I was just pulled in by the memes

How are continental in any shape or form different from SJW spewing opinions

How is it philosophy and not sociology/psychology

this

>Even if you do that, how is that helpful or applicable?
by trying to ground philosophy into something practical (like trying to use it to craft good policy, economics, or laws)

how is continental philosophy helpful or applicable?

You know what isn't logical? Failing to recognize that dividing people against themselves by breeding them to believe in the importance of distinguishing themselves as part of some larger group in order to validate their perspective has been what prevents human beings from figuring out the truth of their common struggle and actually solving the problems we face.

(inb4 someone categorizes this into some memeable farce, thus stripping it of its significance and simultaneously proving its point).