/simg/ Simulation Games General

Attached: 9dOq7Cr.jpg (3000x2400, 519K)

too ded

Attached: 20180324061736_1.jpg (2560x1440, 1.09M)

Attached: eurocopter_tiger.jpg (600x374, 70K)

10

Yeah it's rather an impediment. I'm fixed wing, not helo, but even that's more than doubled in the last ten years. There's a 20% discount for you because this is dollarydoos, but even so.

Attached: 7ATxM1z.jpg (4256x2832, 1013K)

Attached: Solartank.jpg (600x421, 42K)

turbine engines were a mistake

Attached: abrams set on fire.jpg (950x714, 84K)

>caring about fuel
It's like you don't want massive acceleration that's quieter than the tracks.

live

Attached: 1521483401056.jpg (677x960, 119K)

Attached: EtmCr5y.jpg (1600x1207, 1.31M)

That looks like a winamp skin.

Attached: fuS-VfNf8W8.jpg (1200x800, 230K)

>tfw gonna wake up to a dead thread

Don't worry user, death is just the beginning of the next stage of life.

Attached: .gif (530x300, 2.66M)

stop :(

it hurts...

Attached: .gif (500x274, 439K)

He's CEO of ED

I guess more appropriate is was

Attached: .gif (450x255, 2.61M)

Attached: .gif (240x180, 405K)

Or is it?

Attached: .gif (569x400, 2.97M)

I keep asking this question but I want to see if someone else might have an answer.
Why won't LST mode in the harrier lock onto lasers anymore? It just does the same thing as the regular DMT from what I can tell.
Nothing in the manual or the reference mentions anything about this behavior. It still claims it should lock onto a laser if the crosshairs of the LST are pointed at a painted target. Yet, it doesn't anymore.

Attached: .gif (704x400, 789K)

>Inb4 Hornet is cancelled
>Inb4 all other projects are cancelled
>All in a mark of respect to their fallen friend

DCS is dead

stop being gay

Attached: here comes dat BMP.webm (1280x720, 2.28M)

I would be surprised if they wouldnt use this as an opportunity to be lazy.

Attached: 1293670994896.jpg (1600x721, 121K)

too many military bumps

Attached: 90745877.jpg (612x442, 35K)

Do that again an I'll murder you in your sleep.

i want a reason to get back into my beloved french interceptor
dcs plz get well soon
:(

Attached: 6235362772345.jpg (857x613, 69K)

World war 2 is shit and people who play il2 are cretins.

Cold war is shit and people who like BMP are cretins

2000's > Cold War > ww2 > 5th gen garbage

What is the best beginner wheel? Preferably with clutch on the pedals.

Secondhand G27 at non-fuck-you prices; a G29

Attached: IzCmBbN.jpg (2000x1500, 663K)

>tfw never ever

Attached: G0KDj_fthumbnail1000.jpg (200x197, 38K)

>Exclusively by VEAO

Would be as good as never ever. No, it would be like a kick in the bollocks

>HUD
Primitive.

Attached: pure sex.jpg (2880x1920, 863K)

what an ugly ass plane

Lucky you'll never see it when it kills you

>having an aesthetic sense THIS fucking underdeveloped
Off yourself, my man.

Attached: 1434601494824.jpg (712x401, 102K)

Its a fat grey brick, there is nothing nice about its looks. It looks like a cheap shit quality chinese toy.

>having an aesthetic sense THIS fucking underdeveloped
Off yourself, my man.

>similar front silhouette to every fighter ever
>fat
Choose one.

Attached: 2z5it4w.gif (726x390, 17K)

>point TOWARDS the enemy!

This reminds me, the Super Hornet is pretty much an entirely new aircraft, the Navy kept F/A-18 in the name to make it an easier sell to congress.

Attached: fa123cf68285d973b54290083263503a.jpg (1303x892, 599K)

God damn, the YF-23 really does look like something out of Ace Combat

Different reality.

When will 777 fix the German AI? The ai just turn fights, which gives the Russians a huge advantage because that is how they were designed to fight, but the Germans get massacred because they refuse to fight in the vertical.

Attached: 1502394906664.jpg (2348x1576, 1.3M)

So with 2.5 is GPU the main factor now? I have a good CPU but my GPU is fucking ancient, I'm getting a fucking third of the frame rate I had in 1.5

Yep, the engine is now somewhat in line with every game made in the last decade.

I hate miners so fucking much

Attached: 11.jpg (640x480, 31K)

i fail to see the problem

Attached: Afghan_Air_Force_MD-530F_helicopter_fires_machine_guns.jpg (1920x1129, 150K)

Yea this shit ruins career mode, although you can somewhat help it once you get promoted and start being assigned as flight lead or even when you get to unit commander, I would tell the ai to do what I do and climb to a respectable alt and then tell them to engage the enemy and they do a pretty good job but it quickly devolves in to turn fighting again as they never retain their energy advantage, its getting pretty tiresome, Im at the point in the career where my flight of 4-6 109s are regularly going up against 12-15+ enemy aircraft and if we do not have the alt advantage and fly to the 109's strengths then my whole flight is dead.

>mfw the developers of CMANO think the S-400 can easily kill an Eagle from something like 200nms
"SIMULATOR"

Attached: 1403731966973.png (210x230, 3K)

I'm enjoying the new IL2 series but the lack of smoke from crashed aircraft and destroyed objects really kills it I think.

How the heck did this not cause damage?

Attached: 20180326132827_1.jpg (1920x1080, 530K)

>PMDG super realism
>fsx default forced induction
>1900 gallons fuel capacity less than study aircraft
>you can't even operate it on real routes without a technical (fuel) stop.

Attached: tfwphoneshitpost.jpg (1900x950, 669K)

Bless up

Attached: Emoji_u1f64f.svg.png (2000x2000, 92K)

Attached: 081107-F-3701W-001.jpg (2500x1581, 774K)

>also no autofeather
>therefore gimped max takeoff weight
>autofeather switches modeled in cockpit, but no system function
It was supposed to be great, now it's just pretty good.

>It was supposed to be great, now it's just pretty good.
Welcome to /simg/

So is DCS playable yet or should I stick with BMS?

Attached: 1521659961892.png (293x221, 128K)

>DCS
>less playable than BMS ever
If you can get BMS going successfully you can get DCS going successfully.

All aboard!

Attached: helltrain-0000_1.webm (576x530, 2.77M)

Attached: 256500-P-QBQ00-362.jpg (7360x4907, 1.93M)

Comfy

hello fellow sims

ded as ever

/simg/ died because the military air simulators pushed everything else out. Train simulators and other vehicle simulators have a large following, why doesn't anyone talk about them here? Because if you aren't talking about DCS you just get ignored

If they have a large following, why don’t they talk to each other? Air sims are dead quiet. Sorry you train simmers are even more dead that the whole thread does before you reply to one another

You guys should check out SAM simulator, it's actually not nearly as hard as it looks.

l-lonely, quiet, cold as in death

Attached: 71346355.jpg (633x758, 25K)

Give up.

Attached: 1504529869088.png (633x758, 293K)

Does it support VR?

Boi, it don't support fuckin 1080p, have you seen the website for it?

Attached: CYZZLZKUMAAJwO3.jpg-large.jpg (639x658, 44K)

It doesn't even have 3d graphics, lol
>it's great

Pushing buttons and adjusting knobs in a virtual SAM would be a good use of VR. Shame

I used to talk about train sims and tried to learn how to play flightsims properly but got shitted on by the whole thread so i just gave up. I only come here to see if there are any big updates.

That's a shame, I love talking about complicated procedures, but I guess /simg/ doesn't.

These discussions were my favorite. Proper navigation was interesting.