Two spooks

Racial equality is a spook.
Gender equality is a spook.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7R-hTToDRzs&index=148&list=FLsnmALu1ikFmecHWCxav7Qg
nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_Island_(Pitcairn_Islands)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Going around declaring only certain ideologies a spook is a spook

Racial inequality is a spook.
Gender inequality is a spook.
Spooks are a spook.
>tfw spooks all the way down

Those are concepts, not full blown ideologies.

Fucking psychological dead end. Egoism is literally the gibsmedat of philosophy.

Equality of anything is silly
It is unattainable and unfounded anywhere in nature.

What do you mean by equality? Nobody believes men and women or different races are identical.

>Racial equality is a spook.
>Gender equality is a spook.
wym?

I think he means the ideal, which is why we are arguing about spooks.

What ideal?

NOBODY thinks equal means identical. It's only mooted by people who oppose legal and civil rights for certain citizens based on race or gender.

Ideal, as in, something you strive for.

What did OP meant by that? That sexism and racism are still a thing?

So what is the ideal you are talking about?

These legal/civil rights are fueled by spooks.

Gaps in positive life outcomes aren't necessarily evidence of an unequal system. But these ideologues will blindly point to any disparity as some injustice.

By this logic the whole of the U.S is titled in the favor of Ashkenazi Jews. How can 2% of the country make up 48% of billionaires? All of their absurd flabbergasting over-representations must be the result of an unequal system, their IQs have nothing to do with it.

The ideal that you should try to treat different people the same, I assume. Again, I'm giving you my intrepretation of OP's post.

Before you get mad, remember we are discussing this within Stirner's framework.

>These legal/civil rights are fueled by spooks.

Which spook? Nobody believes that different genders and races are identical. You'll have to explain why citizens should be ranked according to what rights they deserve, and how they should be ranked.

>Gaps in positive life outcomes aren't necessarily evidence of an unequal system. But these ideologues will blindly point to any disparity as some injustice.

So long as people with better life outcomes get more of a say in the policies that affect life outcomes, we have to assume it is.

>By this logic the whole of the U.S is titled in the favor of Ashkenazi Jews. How can 2% of the country make up 48% of billionaires? All of their absurd flabbergasting over-representations must be the result of an unequal system, their IQs have nothing to do with it.

High Ashkenazi IQ is a myth. They scored higher on tests a half century ago, they tended to get a better education than average, but not today.

>High Ashkenazi IQ is a myth. They scored higher on tests a half century ago, they tended to get a better education than average, but not today.

The more traditional ones may have brought the median down, but ti's still above the white mean by about 10. Their history is an adequate explanation of that.

youtube.com/watch?v=7R-hTToDRzs&index=148&list=FLsnmALu1ikFmecHWCxav7Qg

Education adequately explains it.

>black people have on average more muscle density
>this is somehow not real

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

equality is spook

>Education adequately explains it.

>"muh education"

Kek this is pretty true

Not him. But Black and White Americans with the same formal level of education differ significantly in their cognitive abilities. Specifically, within any given level of formal education Whites consistently outperform Blacks. Moreover, this effect is so strong that Blacks often underperform Whites who have lower levels of formal education than they do.

Source: national center for education statistics
nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf

Free will is the biggest spook there is. Even bigger, dare I say it, than god.

>Racial inequality & equality are spooks.
>Gender inequality &equality are spooks.
ftfy

Significantly?

We'll see when they actually receive the same start and the same support.

The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study showed that they match white children until they are informed they are black and black people are less capable.

>We'll see when they actually receive the same start and the same support.
You have 10 seconds to explain why black people are universally like this.

Even if places like Germany where the state bends over backwards to support them they are put to shame by the white man.

More like
>race is a spook
>gender is a spook

If actually read him then maybe you wouldn't look like such an idiot you memeing cretin

The standard deviation is 15, between individuals.

Any two random individuals, I mean.

Race and gender are not spooks, they're immutable biological facts.

Of course according to Stirner they would be. But this is because egoism ironically is post-Christian Hegelian nonsense.

is that what your frustrated emotions are telling you?

DEFINE "POST-CHRISTIAN".

>Race isn't a spook
>Can't even define race in a way that contains all people of one race, excludes all people of another race

Acknowledges that Christianity has passed, but continues to uphold inexplicitly Christian concepts.

Most fundamentally free will. But I suppose that's more generally post-religious than post-Christian.

White people are the ones with whiteish skin
Black people are the ones with blackish skin.

QED.

Regardless of their heritage.

wtf i love nazism now

>Racial equality is a spook.
>Gender equality is a spook.
True.

Still, Stirner never said you can't use spooks as useful tools. If either of them are within the egoist's self-interest, pursuing them isn't spooked (unless they are pursuing them because it's the 'right' thing to do or something like that).

Don't spook yourself by caring about race and gender.

racial categories are spooks, doubly so when they're based on absurd criteria like hypodescent ("one drop rule")

...

Daily reminder that spooks are not necessarily bad, and they were the primary tool utilized by elite throughout history to drive the public to work for them. Many plebs trusted a god-emperor, and many serfs fervently believed in a king's divine power, and many citizens put faith into nationalism when their country went to war. If you oppose all spooks, you likely support either primitivism, in which case, you will die, or the education of all people on the nature of spooks, in which case, good luck educating all of humanity, or fighting against all of humanity with your spook-opposing ideology.

Spooks are fine as long as you recognize that they are spooks.

Race and gender themselves are also spooks.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_Island_(Pitcairn_Islands)

> wood re-discovered the skeletons in March 1958, a medical examination determined that the bones were of Caucasian origin, and they were then buried in a shallow grave inside the cave.

>if categories aren't discrete, then theyre exactly the same

the nuance of the post-modernist ladies and gents

What's a spook

Equality in general is a spook.
Only non-spook is freedom

>Hasnt read Stirner where it directly says freedom can be spooky as fuck.

Racism is a spook
Gender is a spook
it goes both ways

Read stirner

Define spook.

people who have yet to google albino african

So is their inherent disparity though. They're just categories that divide influence. If you REALLY wanted and had the millenia to waste you COULD create perfectly equal versions of all categories.

Everything.

Freedom is most certainly a spook unless you'd care to define it for us.

social construct, but thats sjw language so they use 'spook' here