Is there a worse criminal in human history?
>writes books about underage children having very detailed and descriptive sex.
>says Alexander the great wasn't great because he wasn't a woman
>said the Civil War was about slavery
>referred to Alexius IV as Alexius III
>once said European history was "just the worst"
>HATES men!
Fuck this overrated fat liberal cuck
...
>writes books about underage children having very detailed and descriptive sex.
Got any extracts?
You triggered bro?
Quick! Without looking it up, post ITT how tall you think Jon Green is. Then look up his height to see how close you were.
He's very obviously TREMENDOUSLY overrated for being such a weak and amateur historian.
However, he's an entertainer by trade.
He makes money writing what boils down to erotic fanfiction.
He got famous based off of a bunch of youtube videos with super bright colors, rounded shapes, and cartoons made for simpletons to learn the very basics of shit they should already know.
To hold him to the same standard that you would hold an actual expert in his field is ridiculous, and hating on him because he panders to the audience he preforms for is ludicrous.
It's like hating the Kardashians because they play up the "ditzy rich as fuck bimbo" persona for fans that pay to watch them do it.
They're acting.
He's acting.
He never claims to be an expert, he's NOWHERE near an expert.
People put too much of a burden on him to be some intellectual God when he's just a mediocre amateur historian trying to have fun and make a little money.
>writes books about ...
cite passage
>says Alexander wasn't great because he wasn't a woman
cite recording
>said the Civil War was about slavery.
It was
>refered to Alexius IV as Alexius III
humans make mistakes
>once said European history was "just the worst."
cite recording
>HATES men!
cite cite cite
>Fuck this overrated
yes
>fat
not that fat for his age, but ok
>liberal cuck
sure, who cares.
He has no shortage of critics who put him in his place but you're being a critic who fails to put him in his place. You'd do better to actually quote him directly instead of constructing this absurd and emotionally-motivated strawman.
It's ok to not like him.
But your reasons make you look like an autist..
The people who keep making threads about him are way worse.
>To hold him to the same standard that you would hold an actual expert in his field is ridiculous, and hating on him because he panders to the audience he preforms for is ludicrous.
By that standard you can't hate people who want creationism taught in schools.
Not him, but here you go, some shit I found on his "Atlantic Slave trade" video:
>Slaves probably made up 30% of the total Roman population, similar to the percentage of slaves
Total fuck up, slaves made up about 30% of Roman Italy, not the entirety of the Roman Empire. "Estimates of the percentage of the population of Italy who were slaves range from 30 to 40 percent in the 1st century BC"
>>Brutality of working conditions in Brazil on the other hand, meant that Brazil's slave population could never increase naturally.
This is a nitpick, but it "could never increase naturally" is most likely because About 2/3rds of slaves in Brazil were male, not because of brutal working conditions:
"The Brazilian slave population, dependent on continuous imports, was almost two-thirds male." - Communities and Networks in the Ancient Greek World, p. 145
His video on the Dark Ages is also hilariously laughable
He says the period between 600 and 1450 CE is called "Middle ages" or "Dark Ages".
>"If you like cities and great poetry, then the Dark Ages were pretty dark in Europe"
Yes, because Dante, Chaucer and fucking Beowulf did not fucking exist, right?
>"Medieval Europe had .... less cultural output than the original Roman Empire"
The Sagas? Arthurian Corpus? Book of Kells? Pizan? Troyes? Not really cultural, but fucking Roger Bacon?
And then there's the hyping up of Mongol and Arab accomplishments with little mention of their weaknesses and negatives.
Which, while not a horrible thing, is bad in light of his dismissive stance towards Europe.
Instead of enriching one naturally he is detracting from Europe in order to artificially boost interest in the others.
5'7"
damm he's 6'
The slaves were primarily male because the working conditions were so harsh only adult men lasted long enough for their labor to become profitable.
reeeee
>>>says Alexander the great wasn't great because he wasn't a woman
lolwat? source pls
Pretty much this. Crash course world history can be alright to get a quick glance of world history as long as you keep is bias in mind.
So basically it's like reading every historian or historic source ever.
>writes books about underage children having very detailed and descriptive sex.
Lewd, I approve
>says Alexander the great wasn't great because he wasn't a woman
That's not what he said
>said the Civil War was about slavery
But it was, it was about state right to practice slavery
>referred to Alexius IV as Alexius III
A simple mistake that happens
>once said European history was "just the worst"
Was it not?
>HATES men!
>Implying that the white man is not the most hated creature on Earth
Even the white man hates nobody like as much as he hates other white men.
>The Sagas? Arthurian Corpus? Book of Kells? Pizan? Troyes? Not really cultural, but fucking Roger Bacon?
Who?
>Alexander the "Great"
>not Alexander the Historically Determined By Cultural, Genetic and Political Forces He Had No Control Over
Jack the Ripper?
Billy the Kid?
Al Capone?
John Wilkes Boothe?
>Alexander
>The
>Great
>we didn't have sex
Rip in pieces
Don't get too triggered. He's just a guy with a super left-wing bias. Unfortunately, people like that are everywhere so we may as well just deal with it. I'm honestly really tired of seeing Veeky Forums get butthurt about John Green every day; he ain't worth all the energy.
>didnt touch her bare breast
Cuck
I once touched my sister's bare breast and this nigga in that book didnt even manage it with some random slut
Who's the Colonel and why does he interrupt their cringy sex scene with mangled old english
>>referred to Alexius IV as Alexius III
Did you read that in an earlier thread? I posted this, and I doubt anyone else noticed this little discrepancy, because honestly, these guys were pretty irrelevant.
>hasn't heard of Arthurian literature
You might as well leave this board forever.
People are still mad about some random guy who completely obliterated their dumb /pol/itical views. You can't make this shit up.
It's Custer
The story is a historical fiction taking place during the ACW
You know, I made an automation thread, but it was banned because "25 year rule."
Meanwhile every "John Green is a youtube cuck" thread floats around for days.
What gives, mods?
>they start making out
>she immediately falls asleep
>goes away without waking him up
>she sounds like a slut, while he is inexperienced and insecure
>he falls in love
Hits way too close to home.
Fuck John Green for writing such a pathetic character and presenting him as normal.
>He doesn't get the meme
>watch his alexander video
>he goes through a bunch of the positives of alexanders wars
>"none of this would have happened without alexander but it didnt happen because of him"
wat
>"The Brazilian slave population, dependent on continuous imports, was almost two-thirds male." - Communities and Networks in the Ancient Greek World, p. 145
lmao, is that a real source?
another sub human white man. Don't worry our middle eastern seed will give your women a taste of what real men are
Real men don't impregnate their cousins
Thinking all MENA people are muslims arabs
Because mods are shit.
Some fag mod tried to stop "generals" but they still popped up. Fuck this sites moderation team.
>>once said European history was "just the worst"
>Was it not?
no, Canadian history is, trust me, I'm a leaf
>Even the white man hates nobody like as much as he hates other white men.
first off, work on your sentence structure, it's all over the place. Second, wheres the proofs?
Do you have an alternative source to refute his?