Liberals on the left-right spectrum

Did liberals or socialist sit on the left-wing of the National Assembly? If you say "liberals," than liberals are leftist.

Left and right are not the same as liberal and authoritarian
You can be:
> authoritarian left
> authoritarian right
> liberal left
>liberal right

The basic spectrum would sit:
Authoritarian Left, Liberal Left, Undecided Faggots, Liberal Right, Authoritarian Right

Liberals are inherently right wing

Any political party not explicitly moving towards equality of outcomes is right wing

I thought the original was some anarchist farmer in the green?

It's as if there's right-wing and left-wing liberals.

What was the original version of this image?

Liberals would sit on the left, since they were opposed to traditional forms of hierarchy and control. Socialists absolutely do.

No, the left/right dichotomy was established during the French revolution and wasn't about economics or the nature of authority inherently, it was determined by traditionalists versus reformists, and in a more general sense the right was the side that favoured hierarchy and tradition and the left the side that favoured equality and progress.

>this is what leftypol cuckolds actually believe

It's probably more than likely someone on the right that made that post. That old "we want equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome" thing is said by leftists too. Typically it's only the right that will claim that the left wants equality of outcomes.

I'm actually a right leaning moderate

Reminder that the libertarian left doesnt ctually exist and that test claiming 90% of everybody is libleft is silly.

Here's a definition for you

>Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality.[1][2][3][page needed][4] It typically involves a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others (prioritarianism), as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished (by advocating for social justice).[1] The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".[5]

>I'm actually a right leaning moderate
Oh, you're a "right wing until the inter sectional committee of BLM feminist black supremacists tell me to stop" type of right wing

Likewise, you cant actually be an authoritarian capitalist, so the alt right doesnt exist.

Most people are both anti-authoritarian and predisposed towards altruism.

bold statement

Hey thanks for the history lesson I already knew that still doesnt change anything of what I said. You are right but that doesnt change the fact that there are still right and left liberals and authoritarians. They would sit on their respective sides today as they would have back then.

I've seen both, Im not sure which is the original but I find them both appropriate.

Your criteria seems to revolve around individual liberties vs restricting liberty which doesn't make sense. For example 19th century America was a very conservative place by modern standards yet you could buy a pound of heroine and smoke it in your yard. Liberties sync up differently.

What I'm trying to get at is liberals both authoritarian and not would sit on the left. It's not about liberties.

I think you may have been replying to the wrong person or misinterperted my comment. I agree with you. They would both be sitting on the left.
I was explaining the spectrum to him in modern terms, while you seem to be using your more period specific description of liberalism. Liberals cannot, by definition, be authoritarian, but both can be left. Thats what I was explaining to him.
I understand the big split in the national assmebly was liberal (left) and conservative (right), but as we are now considering authoratarianism we cannot abide simply by those two terms.
Also, I never even implied any criteria to spectrum. Its just the way the spectrum is.

Oh, gotcha.