What is his endgame?
What is his endgame?
Christopher Phillips
Other urls found in this thread:
Zachary Johnson
a spandau on every corner
Nicholas Wright
Reinforcing anglo supremacy through psychological warfare
Liam Miller
Return of the Empire
Ryan Myers
Balkanization of France.
Eli Hernandez
Nobody truly understands the Eternal Anglo.
Jace Watson
The shifty perfidious albion doesnt understand itself either.
Evan Taylor
Correcting the record of history,from the absurd idea of riding a horse into battle to understanding why the churchill and bren singlehandetly shifted the tide of the war.
James Gomez
To get lots of youtube hits and money sent by making bizarre, provocative claims in his video titles and then retreating to a more conventional point in the video itself, which is neither revolutionary nor particularly interesting.
Luis Lopez
The titles are not even that controversial. It's just that retards here don't understand how questions work and are more interested in dank maymays than what the guy actually says.
John Edwards
The containment of the Eternal Baguette.
Gavin Nguyen
Getting money from youtube and spreading Anglo soft power (as if they need more of it)
Benjamin Green
How is "Cavalry is a stupid idea" not pretty controversial? Or how about when in his follow up video about spandau vs bren he uses the term "fan boys" in his title to discredit valid criticisms to his original video?
Julian Sanders
He's still better than the fat aussie ex-mormon who rules from his cardboard throne AKA Shadiversity
Sebastian Wood
>knows all about medieval shit
>knows litterally nothing about modern concepts
He is an intresting lad, but don't trust him on anything other than history
Brayden Jenkins
To sell The Great Courses subscriptions.
Leo Hall
...
David Smith
>Did the Battle of Zama actually happen?
He's definitely guilty of clickbaiting, as much as England is of Genocide in the Boer War
Nathan Brooks
>Genocide in the Boer War
Rubbish.
youtube.com
Grayson Morales
And what's wrong with that title?
Did it happen? Yes.
Landon Scott
Only ANGLOS may truly understand the endgoals of fellow ANGLOS
Hudson Bell
Because it is a stupid idea in the time period and context in which he sets the question.
Lincoln Gutierrez
But amusingly, not for the reasons he sets out, which are inevitably tied up in shock cavalry usage that wasn't how cavalry was originally used.
Aaron Harris
Something to the order of "kill all Catholics" I would imagine.
Julian Peterson
No
Bentley Cruz
The question implies that there is doubt that it happened.
Benjamin Perry
Only if you want it to be.
Brayden Brooks
Not him, but to the non-autistic segment of the population, yes, generally, if you frame a question to something that is almost universally accepted, it implies doubt.
>Does the earth really go around the sun?
Could theoretically be an innocent question, devoid of subtext. Asked in the modern day though, where heliocentrism is pretty universally accepted, you wouldn't ask the question in the first place unless you wanted to make a statement of some sort. I mean, why would you?
Jaxson Nguyen
>why would you ask that question
Because it then provides a springboard to talk about that topic.
Does the Earth really go around the sun? Yes and here's why.
Carson James
And why would you feel a need to talk about a topic that is common knowledge? Why not just call it "orbital mechanics" if you really want to talk about 1st grade science class tier shit?
Andrew Thomas
To tell people about that topic? To make money? The same reason any YouTube makes videos?
Samuel Thompson
The eternal glory of Britain.
Cameron Foster
...
Carter Allen
He actually tried to justify Market Garden. How delusional was he? What kind of tea is he having?
John Anderson
Surprisingly he doesn't drink tea.