>>2161088

Lots of Germans emigrated to America.

Anglos made the USA what it was.

Eternal Kraut reversed that.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=U1MAaa3xRrs
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>why do americans still see their nation and their government as perpetual victims and/or heroes that are entitled to economic/political rewards?
because they have to carry the rest of you shitstains in western europe in terms of defence funding

>Lots of Germans emigrated to America.
>Eternal Kraut reversed that.
explain, please.
how does that fit in the narrative of a country that tries to become the world police?

>why do americans still see their nation and their government as perpetual victims and/or heroes that are entitled to economic/political rewards?

It started in the early-mid 1800's with the British impressment of American sailors, the Barbary Wars, and culminated with Alfred Thayer Mahan's 'The Influence of Sea Power upon History' published in 1890. All of it gave birth to the philosophy and perception of America's role policing the world's shipping and trade lanes, seen almost as the nuclear deterrence of its time, and has expanded from there.

American "exceptionalism" and meddling in civil and state conflicts aside, it's worth noting the decline in first world warfare coincides with America's rise in power.

Syrian conflict bump is missing from this graph but despite our proxy and political involvement in state/civil war, conflict remains in overall decline.

>why do americans still see their nation and their government as perpetual victims and/or heroes that are entitled to economic/political rewards?

Judging by how tough it is to recruit young men to fight for wars nowadays, and considering that the Iraq War is now widely considered a blunder, I think the average person has become privy to the fact that American foreign policy is far from noble. As for those who still fall for the propaganda, I can only assume they're either ignorant or prefer to look the other way because jingoism.

Whether American hegemony is a good thing is another discussion entirely. But in American politics, foreign policy is almost never framed in terms of maintaining hegemony, instead it's mostly paranoia with a bit of humanitarianism.

America is as perfidious (actually more, as they have the scope to do their game everywhere) as any other player in the geopolitical game, and those that cant see that are blind. But would you prefer anther power to be dominant?

yes, I'd prefer a stalin-like leader

but seriously, why do we have to decide which power will rule us, instead of actually following our own destiny?

All U.S. genocides. Such as rolling thunder and dresden, net saved lives.

I don't think future historians will be able to compete with the United States powerlevel.

Probably because we give over $30 billion in foreign aid when all but two others give less than $10 billion.

You can't get Americans to go along with your take over the world ruling class wealthy people bullshit unless you lie to them all the fucking time.

So they lie to the people with this shit:

>perpetual victims and/or heroes

...so that they are cool with rich people ruling class take over the world bullshit.

PROTIP

Search for

Cognitive Dissonance

samefag

Also The Cold War

Now The War on Terror

Basically you keep Americans terrified of Communist Russians or Islamic Terrorists in order for them to go along with the take over the world bullshit.

The USA is fairly lowly ranked in terms of the percentage of GDP it spends on foreign aid though.

>WE

WUZ

PROUD
R
O
U
D

>dresden
>US genocide
US aircraft were obviously involved, but the Dresden bombings were primarily a British operation.

>NOOO WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS

>waaaah stop bombing materiel factories in wartime wtf
>waaaah stop using dumb bombs even though that's really all there were at the time

>medieval city center and even the fucking zoo
>materiel factories
pic one you *nglo scum

>NOOO LEMME DEFLECT SOME MOAH, WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS N DINDU NUFFIN

Nationalism

Ever consider the possibility that warfare has become less common over time and that nuclear weaponry/fear of WW3 may account for this and not "le American world police" ?

It's called deterrence and the US became the first power able to apply it globally.

>first link
>nothing about funding the opposition in serbia throughout the 90s culminating in the 2000 overthrow
youtube.com/watch?v=U1MAaa3xRrs
Here's a scene from one of my favorite movies.

>it's worth noting the decline in first world warfare coincides with America's rise in power.
And what of the middle east and south africa?

*south america, obviously.

>decisive end to the Balkan Wars
>bad

nigga wat

>America sees itself as perpetual victims

I understand the "heroes" thing because our government has basically outsourced propaganda. Victims, though?

South Slaves get butthurt as fuck when they aren't free to kill each other wholesale

As soon as hegemony breaks down in the region again they'll be at each others throats like the dogs they are.

See, everyone says "slavs" or "the Balkans" when there's exactly one faction causing all the shit.

Serbs.

If anything, they're lucky Milosevic fell after the NATO bombing campaign so they didn't end up as a pariah state like Iraq did after 1991.

because try and stop us nerd

>when there's exactly one faction causing all the shit.
The West? As in US and German intelligence operations to gain a Balkan base (US) or gain general influence (D), while the UK impotently works against that just because Germany?

Oh shit, it's one of you

>Serbs didn't chimp out and kill everyone
>it was those sneaky Anglos

All I'm getting out of your posts is that people who aren't American aren't smart enough to self govern and it would be neglect to let them try.

yawn

>your posts
? only posted the one.