Is this legit?

Those odds are that way because the police exist (fear), and they barely even exist in rural areas.

Depends on which brand of Libertarianism you're talking about

Yes it's legit
Legit /pol/
Gtfo my Veeky Forums

So theyre nobodies who wouldnt be a single person in op's pic? Neato.

I remember Ann Coulter confronting those DUDE WEED AND GAYS LMAO libertards a couple years back.

youtube.com/watch?v=qg39293qTEY

So wrong.

I would have thought they'd be indifferent so long as it isn't paid for by tax dollars

They view it as a violation of NAP I'm guessing.

kek

I wanted to rewrite a longer post but deleted the first one after you already replied, what I wanted to add is:
Obama is not against private property, neither is Hillary Clinton. Do you think they would ever advocate expropiating businesses and creating worker committees? Or praise Durruti? Do you think libertarian socialists would favor corporations?
In response to your question, some people in OP's pic might be libertarian leftists, some might care about the topics in the picture and not the ownership of the means of production. How would I know?

The odds of an american outliving an yuropoor are low because socialized total healthcare doesn't exist in the USA (preventive medicine and costly medical treatments aren't acessible to all).

tfw no Ann gf

>against the war on drugs
>legalized prostitution
>against religious laws
>against race-based discrimination
>concerned about police corruption and brutality
>pro free-market, including for labor

Yes, these generally represent libertarian positions. Abortion depends on your school of thought; there are libertarians for and against.

She's such a stupid cunt.

Libertarian means less goverment control, either socially or fiscally. When a person suports more taxes and SOMETIMES wants less gov regulation on things like weddings, they are hardly libertarian, since they also deny religion being taught in school, and deny cake workers the ability to deny business

Why do people think forced healthcare makes it more accessable? You are lowering the wages of people and making the healthcare industry less competetive. American bad health probably comes from food additives and drug consumption.

The left doesn't limit the scope of power to governments but recognizes economic power as another big factor that limits the freedom of ordinary people.

>American bad health probably comes from food additives and drug consumption.
Because of monetary incentives to do so are so high, while the cost of pushing those things into the market is so low. You should take the subsidies from corn and put those into your hospitals.

>Why do people think forced healthcare makes it more accessable?
Because countries with better health outcomes than the USA have more socialized healthcare - meaning healthcare is less privatized, not that they spend more per capita, as preventive medicine reduces total cost in the long-term.

And even among countries with worse health outcomes than the USA, those with more socialized healthcare tend to do better than those with less.

You can look up WHO data, or similar sources.

>more taxes

Less taxation is not a libertarian policy, it's just the usual result of libertarian policies. A libertarian does not necessarily want to lower taxes in all situations. Nor does he think there are no valid uses of government power (that would make him an anarchist). Finally, libertarians can be moderate or hardline, just like with any other ideology.