Most effective army

Name one sent more effective than the caroleans, i'm waiting...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalan_Company
smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-tornado-that-saved-washington-33901211/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

militia of Brno

>swedish superiority

>army is Finnish

30%, you could call it swedish and finnic if you' like

Still waiting for answers

FRÄNDER, BRÖDER

VÅR STORMAKSRID ÄR ÖVER

VÅRT RIKE BLÖDER

FANAN STÅR I BRAND

How long did that last again, Sven? Some fucking """""empire"""""...

It lasted roughly a century 1611-1718. Not extremely good, but not abysmally bad either. Besides, that wasn't answering my uestion now was it?

Murrica. No hostile boots on American soil in 200 years despite constantly being engaged in "police actions" when not fighting large scale conventional actions.

Given that your armed forces job is to enforce the nations will on others while keeping your own borders safe, that's an exceptional track record.

>constantly being involved in police actions

no

>no
Yes.
100 wars in 238 years.

dumb

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalan_Company
>mfw catalans used to be based

Scoreboard.

Contrast: Soviets.

>No hostile boots on American soil

How about mexican cartels on american soil?

The police are decidedly less effective at their respective jobs than the military

French army during the Napoleonic Wars
German army during WW2
Zhukov's walking cemetery
Etc....

1611-1721
Sorry it weren't longer but we got assraped by a fuckhueg coalition with almost no outside help

>No hostile boots on American soil in 200 years
Does nine eleven count?

what was his end game?

Fungols are literally the most powerful race in the world. Their autism just makes them such an interesting people.

well, the Danish army for a start.

>Zhukov's walking cemetery

I love Veeky Forums memes

Somali irregulars

>How about mexican cartels on american soil?

most of the cartel folks active in the US are Americans so they're not really a hostile foreign military or a military at all for that matter.

those sorts of people are not americans

Most people in "Finland" were seen as Swedes.
Large portion still do.

yes, I'm sure you all wish you still had such Swedes among you

mongols
hyper war finns

>I'm sure you all wish you still had such Swedes among you
>you still had such Swedes among you
what did he mean by this?

kek most finns was put on guard duty in town and wasent pressent in the field exept for one cav regiment

>be sweden
>intervene in foreign affairs (like autists) because France pays you
>murder indiscriminately and act like autists
>get ass thoroughly beat
>almost sign treaty
>need fucking France to come save you
>France does all the hard work by murdering Spaniards and Germans at the same time
>"wew lad top military power sweden stronk"
>70 years later
>take pride in meaningless military victories that you achieved in a war you lost
>100 years later
>lose even more

Unironically this nigg

America is honestly the shittiest in military terms as a great power.

And this is not even because I'm some sort of resentful grudge holding cuck or third worlder. I see American primacy as a necessity for a more free and more humanitarian world.
But please god, America only has a lot of Jew gold with which to project lots of brute force. You're not exactly military geniuses.

>No hostile boots on American soil in 200 years

That's because you're a continent seperated from the Old World ( where all the action happens ) by two giant oceans.

I still can't wrap my head around that one.

>Large portion still do


What did he mean by this? I was under the assumption fenno-swedes feel more finnish since they're one of the most passionate pushers of nationalism? Might you explain me your insight?

>you will be never named puccinator
Why live

Horse archers probably.

>No hostile boots on American soil in 200 years
Because the Aleutian Islands campaign never happened.

Didn't they lose the Great Northern War?

yes.
However, go back to 205 years and they had their fucking capitol burned down.

Yes we did. But it sure wasn't due to soldiers and generals incompetence. It was only our invasion of russia which caused the great defeat.
And if the Carolean army were to attack russia instantly after the battle of narva. Chances would've been extremely high that we would'we won the war completely

blah blah blah blah

that's your post

as you might be aware it was sort of under construction at the time, what damage that was caused was negligible

there was also a neat tornado that destroyed British ships in the area and put out remaining fires

smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-tornado-that-saved-washington-33901211/