Well?

Well?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
youtube.com/watch?v=tNveMjoSxp0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Materialistically? No.

Spiritually? Yes.

This is why a materialistic definition of the universe is asinine.

I mean, those workers that reassembled the trolley onto the track and still had it hurtling towards that guy are assholes.

...

What's the answer to this one? To let the trolleys collide and destroy the PPE of the company and everyone inside the trolleys, or to divert one of the trolleys and kill the other man while saving the trolleys themselves.

Sorry pic related

Is there some how to kill both?

Well, we don't know if there are people in them.

>asinine

Says the guy who doesn't understand cause and effect.

>trolleys have spirits
lmao

The workers were poor and being exploited by the trolley company, but the company is owned by a capitalist who has come to the conclusion that exploiting workers is wrong and is secretly supporting workers rights movements around the country. The owner also took out a life insurance policy on the person whom is tied to the rails that the piece-by-piece replacement car is heading down. He will give the proceeds of this life insurance policy to Islamist extremists to attack a random populated city center.

how do you feel now?

Set it on the long track, and kick the guy close to you to death.

>spiritually

Explain your reasoning.

Spirituality is more than just mysticism. Literally, I'm just using its definition to describe the event of what the intention was.

...

You've activated my trap card.

>Spirituality is more than just mysticism

Clearly not in your case because you're opposing it to materialism in a vain attempt to be contrarian.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

I don't think you're using that word properly. It's fine though we all make mistakes.

If somebody has to dead, I prefer to see the death, just for curiosity

I am. Many authors would agree. Just recently it has been adapted to a strictly religious or mystical perspective.

Identities are an artifact of language. If you do not accept this, then you do not accept science or logic, and if you do not accept science and logic, then you are a hypocrite for using technology.

This is the answer to every trolley question.

Just solved the trolley problem

...

But 1 + 1 + 1 + ... can be shown to be equal to the analytical continuation of Riemann zeta function at ΞΆ(0), equaling just -1/2.

DONT

TOUCH

THAT

SWITCH

Lold

And I unsolved it

...

If you run over the dindos then the trolly won't explode and the people inside have a better chance of not being injured. You also have the chance to send Abu to gitmo for questioning if you can defuse him.

...

Found you.

...

...

Yes.

...

...

I've never understood these cartoons. People will die no matter your choice so just walk away, who gives a fuck?

this problem is stupid

Someone make a trolley problem with zhukov and ten million russian conscripts.

...

>pull lever to the right
>youtube.com/watch?v=tNveMjoSxp0

kek

>You cannot kill yourself
Haha. I like how this is thought of, even though though suicide would be pointless since it defaults to something anyway. It's almost saying you would commit suicide BECAUSE it's playing All Star or an anime song while mowing down innocent people.

The first part of the scenario is completely irrelevant to the question and why it's being asked. It doesn't matter that there's a man on the right track. The entire question has only to do with the man at the end of the long track on the left.

It is also irrelevant that there is a man at the end of the 1000 mile stretch. That man is going to be killed regardless of what your answer is to the actual question. These elements are only included to introduce feelings or doubt into your reasoning.

In the end, the question being asked is, "if every single piece of a trolley is replaced, is it still the same trolley?", and everything else included in the text is just flavor and/or distraction.

The answer is no, it is not the same trolley if literally every single part is replaced with another part. The original trolley is nothing more than a bunch of disassembled pieces at that point.

>In the end, the question being asked is, "if every single piece of a trolley is replaced, is it still the same trolley?"
yeah that's because the image is a joke combining two distinct hypotheticals to artificially increase the absurdity and unlikelihood of the scenario at the expense of the original problem's creator.

see

the original trolley didn't, but my actions resulted in his death (and saved the life of the other guy)

also since it is a 1000 mile trip there is a small chance he might manage to break free of the ropes