Was carthage better than rome or inferior?

They lost. That's all that matters

>Hi guys I have autism

Yeah the world's most experienced army bolstered with experienced and vicious Gauls. But yeah, basically they were a bunch of retards, right bub.

>Moloch worshippers
Into the trash Carthage goes!

We all talk about Carthage losing to Rome but Aristotle was praising them at a time when the Romans were still getting over a gallic sacking of their city, so you gotta consider heydays.

Would we say the Germans are better than Rome?

Personally I still vote Rome, but I think people always think of Carthage as "rome's rival" carthage and not anything before that.

Better.
They didn't culturally enrich their client states.

>carthage
>fell to one of the most civilized powers at the time
>rome
>fell to a bunch of snownigger barbarians

>believing Roman propaganda

They found the bones of children.

>implying you can quantify this kind of stuff

>Bible says Canaanites sacrifice children
>Bible has a myth that tells the story of ending child sacrifice, showing that the Israelites probably sacrificed children at some point
>Romans say that Carthaginians sacrifice children, independently
>Find mass graves of burnt baby bones along with other animals, not with humans or urns
No, clearly the Carthaginians are the victims of libel

This.

they were an impressive trading civilization. maybe rome could have been better or lasted longer if instead of blobbing, they instead established small trading cities throughout europe, etc.

>lions and donkeys

Fuck Carthage, fuck Rome, fuck those "civilized" faggots

Carthaginians were merchants and Romans were militaristic by their nature. Carthage sounds better.

Also ancient vertical cities are cool.

With sea Jews, you lose

Peak Carthage was annihilated by mid republic Rome. It's kinda hard to make any argument for it being better.
I struggle to think of any way Carthage contributed more to human history and culture than Rome, especially since 99% of its written production did not survive to the present day.

You do realize that Carthage lasted 700 odd years to Rome's 1100 (or 2100 if you count the ERE) right?

t. Celtcuck

Roman Republic and its institutions was effective. Way effective than carthaginian. All Punic Wars proved that. What is the point of question?

>What is the point of question?
Boos gonna boo.

>citation needed

They also alleged that Cronus31 had turned against them inasmuch as in former times they had been accustomed to sacrifice to this god the noblest of their sons, but more recently, secretly buying and nurturing children, they had sent these to the sacrifice; and when an investigation was made, some of those who had been sacrificed were discovered to have been supposititious. 5 When they had given thought to these things and saw their enemy encamped before their walls, they were filled with superstitious dread, for they believed that they had neglected the honours of the gods that had been established by their fathers. In their zeal to make amends for their omission, they selected two hundred of the noblest children and sacrificed them publicly; and others who were under suspicion sacrificed themselves voluntarily, in number not less than three hundred. 6 There was in their city a bronze image of Cronus, extending its hands, palms up and sloping toward the ground, so that each of the children when placed p181thereon rolled down and fell into a sort of gaping pit filled with fire.

penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diodorus_Siculus/20A*.html

Is there any archaeological evidence corroborating such a thing?

Can I get a reference for that?

Yep.

theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginians-sacrificed-own-children-study

neat, thanks!
>t. learned something

Looks like he is talking about that:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanno_the_Navigator#Gorillai

Technically inferior but I do like Carthage and the Barca dynasty more than a lot of Roman stuff.

Hannibal really did beat the fuck out of them though to the point where they were pretty fucking triggered.

Yes.

PS: Babies are buried here

Carthage was actually a league of polis, like the attic league in Greece. Carthage was the city-state leading the league. They were good at sea battles, but bad at land warfare.

delenda est.

>They were good at sea battles
Were they really? They barely managed a couple victories on the sea when Rome barely knew how to swim before getting the advantage reversed on them with the corvus. And in the second and third wars Rome rekt them completely and absolutely from a naval point of view.

On the other hand, they were at least average on land. Their mercenary cavalry (whic in some part was only mercenary in the sense roman auxiliaries were, since a lot of numidian tribes were subject to Carthage and a good few gauls were actually allies) in particular was top notch.

>Carthage was actually a league of polis, like the attic league in Greece. Carthage was the city-state leading the league.
Also you could make the same argument for Rome, which originally was a confederation of latin cities politically dominated by Rome. Both cities eventually expanded by force and colonization rather than diplomacy.

Rome survived and layed another layer on the foundation of western civilization. Carthage meanwhile...

Most are still borns anyway, not sacrifices