Filthy Anglo agent """"teacher"""": Class, can anyone tell me what started World War 1?

>Filthy Anglo agent """"teacher"""": Class, can anyone tell me what started World War 1?

>Brainwashed Anglofied student: World War 1 was started due to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

WRONG

This is REALLY why World War 1 started. Time to take the train all the way to Red Pill City

The eternal Anglo HATES German economic ascendance more than anything else. This is as true 2017 as it was in 1914. The Berlin-Baghdad pipe-line would have been a game-changer for Germany and the Middle East. This is why Germany had to go. This is why the independent nation of Serbia even exists. It doesn't matter if Ferdinand is never assassinated, the filthy Anglo would have concocted some other scheme or false flag to start a war with Germany. This is also why World War 2 was enthusiastically fought. Almost every major event of the last 200 years has served only to swell the coffers of the biggest robber nation in the history of mankind. NEVER LET THEM CHANGE THE TRUTH

lmaoing at your life

At least you're semi correct.
Maybe more than just semi correct.
The causes of WW1 were many and significant and said railroad was one of them, one that's often overlooked.
People tend to forget that the railroad originally featured Serbia, and the Belgrade-Nis railroad was specifically built by Serbia on Austrian demands with a loan from a French bank that went bankrupt shortly after.

You're wrong when you say it's only the Anglo ™
All the great powers were involved in creating such a stage.
Germany breaking it's alliance with Russia is the single stupidest thing in the period (try blaming that on the Anglo).

However the most retarded thing anyone can say is that a WORLD WAR happened because some dude shot some heir to the throne that everyone hated.

WW1 objectively started when Germany attacked Ryssia and France
Britain's entry to war was a nice addition, but France and Ryssia were enoygh to make it a world war
If you think otherwise, you've been brainwashed into overrating Britain's role

>He might unironically think his teacher is an agent

Why would the Anglo Cabal bother sending an agent to your high school?

Can we all agree that the Eternal Ruskie constantly stirring shit in the Balkans, propping up the Balkan League and protecting the s*rbs makes them more culpable than the Austrians for the start of the war?

Russia was literally purposely creating states hostile to Austria-Hungary directly to their south and somehow we're supposed to think they were surprised when this sparked a conflict? It's the geopolitical equivalent of letting your rabid dog into your neighbor's back yard then getting pissed at your neighbor for kicking your rabid dog after it bit them.

Austria created a "sovereign" Serbia in 1878, not Russia.
Austria agitated Serbia in the years leading up to the war.
You know nothing, stop using assumptions to propagate your narrative.

t. Ivan

Yes exactly, World War 1 was too massive to be just the fault of one nation.
It took every major power's effor to do something so huge and idiotic.
Like my teacher said, every nation perceived that their core necessities were at risk.

Nice argument.
The establishing of a Serbia fully independent from Turkey was solely done via a deal between Jovan Ristic and Gyula Andrassy.
Russia had no influence over the congress of Berlin.

>Germany breaking it's alliance with Russia is the single stupidest thing in the period (try blaming that on the Anglo).
This.

>Be Wilhelm II
>Take over the reins of a world power in industrial expansion, about to overtake Britain as the #1 economy
>Alliances with Russia, Italy, Austro-Hungary, friendly relations with Britain and France
>Rather than play it quietly like China does today, start a dreadnought arms race, antagonizing Britain
>Scare the crap out of the French with the Pantersprung incident in Morocco
>Antagonize Russia into becoming an enemy
>Remove Bismark from power, leading to socialists and communists becoming unruly again
Wilhelm II was a fucktard.

When I say purposely creating hostile states I wasn't suggesting Russia literally made Serbia a thing, I'm saying they were responsible for stirring shit in the 1900s in regards to the Balkan wars and strengthening/supporting a Serbia which was hostile to A-H.

They literally helped create an alliance between Serbia and Bulgaria which was meant to be against the Austrians.

>Muh naval arms race
When will this shitty meme die? Putting aside that the Navy was intended to protect the colonies, doesn't world war 1 prove that naval parity was a necessity? Another nation being able to blockade you into submission is a pretty existential threat.

Everything else you said is true

I suppose the underlying cause would be economic competition and other political schemes. However, in this timeline the official catalyst of The Great War was the Assassination of Franz Ferdinand, even with many other ambitions and rivalries in Europe,

Britain was the only one who was allowed to have a navy in Europe.

Yes. And it was not unreasonable to take exception to that.

Britain and Germany are scrambling for dominance in Europe

Germany finds an excuse to wage war and get ahead i.e. The Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand

Britain doesn't like that.

WOW
O
W

The USA has TWICE the fleet of Russia and China COMBINED, let's not compare the technology.
How's that for naval parity?
>These challenges were reflected by the Naval Defence Act 1889, which was instituted on May 31, 1889, to increase the United Kingdom's naval strength and formally adopt the country's "two-power standard". The standard called for the Royal Navy to be as strong as the world's next two largest navies combined

Sure, in a perfect just world, it would be more "fair" for Germany to be just as navaly powerful as Britain. But that doesn't make it a smart idea to poke the 600-lb naval gorilla.

really fuggen hate these unilateral views on "why WW1 started"
as if not every country involved was itching for war

france was completely unprepared for the war and there's no reason to suggest they wanted it