Things you hate

>"Everything was better pre-WW2, when men were REAL men!"

Other urls found in this thread:

cbsnews.com/news/ben-carsons-unusual-theory-about-pyramids/),
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revanchism
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

If I see that "hard times create hard men" picture one more time, I am going to fucking scream.

If that was that case, shitheels why didn't literally every country that was slowly being subjugated by an outside force become great? Oh right, because it isn't fucking true. You don't magically turn Super Saiyan just because things are going bad.

how does this make you feel?

Like I'm staring at an artifact from another time, back when the Internet was fun.

It's true though

Is it obama on the left?

Implying there is anything more manly than completely breaking all social norms to be with the one you love.

Nigga, do you know how many fucking times that has been said throughout history?

I can literally pull the direct quotes of the Greeks, Romans, Persians, and Mongols saying it without having to look that shit up. All at tremendously different years in history.

You may as well be saying, "Everything was better than all of the rest history, except those other times, in the short period of time that I unflinchingly defend as being amazing in all ways."

how do you measure scientific advancement

>people were healthier back then cos they didnt eat so much preservatives we do today

When the flu would kill you more times than not cos you were eating less than a thousand kcal.

muh feels, apparently

>Nigga, do you know how many fucking times that has been said throughout history?
this

adding to that, sick of hearing people declare "kids these days" are ruining everything.

in fact, any statement that includes the phrase "these days" is irritating as fuck

I don't consider killing yourself for the emperor very manly just fanatical.

Dying for the Emperor could be manly, assuming that your deeds were honorable. Crashing into a fucking ship, or at least trying to, so that you could pointless extend a lost war was not honorable; just desperate.

The US made the right choice in bombing them. MacArthur should have done more to humble the Emperor.

Ben Carson says Egyptian pyramids were grain stores, not pharaohs' tombs

University are affiliated with the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In an interview with CBS (cbsnews.com/news/ben-carsons-unusual-theory-about-pyramids/), Carson stated, "It's still my belief, yes [...] the pyramids were made in a way that they had hermetically sealed compartments....You would need that if you were trying to preserve grain for a long period of time."

This is verbatim from his 1998 speech:

>"My own personal theory is that Joseph built the pyramids in order to store grain. And all the archeologists think that they were made for the pharaohs’ graves. But, you know, it would have to be something awfully big if you stop and think about it. And I don’t think it’d just disappear over the course of time to store that much grain. And when you look at the way that the pyramids are made, with many chambers that are hermetically sealed, they would have to be that way for a reasons."

According to CBS, the basis for Carson's belief is a reference from Genesis to the seven years of plenty, when "Joseph stored up grain in great abundance like the sand of the sea, until he stopped measuring it, for it was beyond measure." In the Bible, Joseph fed Egypt and the rest of the world during the seven years of drought that followed.

Crashing a plane into a ship takes a few minutes of fanaticism, then it's over.

Doing something that will make you ostracized for the rest of your life and sticking to it takes decades of pain and will keep testing you. Waifuism is the most true expression of iron willpower and courage.

Speaking of the Pyramids.

>"THEY WUZ BUILT BY DA JOOZ"

Every time I hear someone say this I cringe.

>Willingness to sacrifice your life for the sake of a man you never met and the nation isn't manly even though you aren't even forced to do it
So this is the... power of western """"""values""""""

People who defend the internet and think of it as a good thing mostly, and call people who disagree luddites.

You see that a lot here and on reddit.

This. I hate this stupid picture so fucking much.

>Broad generalisations about ethnic groups
>followed by an attempt to rationalize said generalisations with cherrypicked examples and flinging the burden of proof to you so you have to "disprove" said generalizations

No fuck you. "The Germans" are not bent on destroying Europe, "The Japanese" are not mindless drones, "The Americans" aren't imperialist fatsos etc.
Either discuss specific examples or stop being an autistic parrot.

Nope. Not under those circumstances.

The Emperor knew that the war was fucking over, his people were starving to death as a nation and America's bombing campaign had shown itself to be impervious to any sort of defense they could muster. Even the Caesars bowed, so could that limp dick.

I dont know about "good" - that can have a lot of definitions - but I do think the internet is impresive. A real peak of human achievement.

What's wrong with the internet?

>wiliness
they were indoctrinated and brainwashed

I don't like it when people look at cat pictures. Therefore, it is immoral.

I cringe whenever someone does "We Wuz" bullshit. I understand it's mostly all tongue in cheek, but for fuck sakes the people who actually believe it are disturbingly stupid.

There are so many downsides. It's intrusive, loss of privacy, the distribution and demand for harmful pornography, social media navel gazing, toxic echo chambers, a tool for disinformation. And contrary to the claim that people are more intelligent because we have all this information at our finger tips - it's just not true. People are still very uneducated, which shows that just because people have easier access to information doesn't mean they're going to bother to use it.

THIS SO FUCKING MUCH

REAL LIFE IS NOT POLANDBALL

>In this battle that happened hunders of years before i was born WE did really great!

Generalizations are tools. As long as one understands that and treats them as such, instead of as perfect descriptions of reality, they are fine. "Germany" as a political actor is a different entity from Hans the random German and the way to deal with the first tells us nothing on how to deal with the second.

I know, I meant the person who treats nationalities like monolithic entities based on stereotypes. I fully agree with you.

>"Christianity didn't do anything good, only bad things came out of it"

How about "Thicc times create hard men"?

>"Islam didn't do anything good, only bad things came out of it"

>Everything is better post-WW2.
>Everything is better post Sexual Revolution

Just end them already.

I don't see what is so controversial about the notion that adversity (so long as not completely overwhelming) makes us stronger and too much comfort makes us weaker.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revanchism

because while adversity may make a very small minority stronger, for the vast majority adversity makes us significantly weaker. for every cunning, street-smart survivor living in a modern shithole there are 100 crippled and impoverished addicts, junkies and wasters.

>Akshully, Stalin was just as bad IF NOT WORSE THAN Hitler
>Germany was on the defensive in WW1
>In the middle ages, peasant armies took up arms to fight for their nation
>Sex outside of marriage rarely happened before the sexual revolution

>The Byzantines spoke Greek, had their capital in Greece, lived like Greeks and fought like Middle Easterners, but they really were Roman! They even had chariot races!
>France hasn't been a militarily successful since Napoleon!
>Man, why would anybody like Sparta when the Athenians had so much culture!
>Roman history ends with Nero and begins again with Constantine the Great
>Ancient Egypt and China were unchanging Monolithic states that continuously built Pyramids/Palaces until the Romans/Muslims/Mongols conquered them


Except Japanese masculinity reached its height after WWII with Mishima's attempted coup.

What is this based on? A game of CivIII?

Because it's fucking wrong. While it may be true that territorial loses has the potential to spur radical shifts in military and governmental organization, it doesn't mean it actually will. And even if it does, this once more does not mean you will be able to reverse those loses inflicted upon you. See below.

You're an idiot. It's literally just waxing on about the glory days in an attempt to get people to kill themselves. I am actually glad that whoever made that Wiki page didn't have the gall to mention the massive, and repeated, battles for land reclamation that the Eastern Empire undertook. All that adversity and shit made them stronger as a people. I mean, they're still around, right?

This notion is as true as the notion about how shit times makes the shitty people which is the known vicious circle in third world countries i.e. society is disfunctional because of corruption, people believe that corruption is only way to live, society turn out to be even more corrupted, and so on. There is no simple mechanism of things are worse now so we are somehow by default better than before.

> Sex outside of marriage rarely happened before the sexual revolution
As if prostitution was invented 50 years ago, lmao.

Someone couldn't handle /int/'s banter.

>Sex outside of marriage rarely happened before the sexual revolution

Who the hell says this one? Besides Incels.

Every r9k guy...

I see it a lot on Veeky Forums, which is annoying. I guess there's a sizeable contingent of insecure retards staying there.

Right, besides Incels.

/pol/

The occasional reactionary trying to draw some line to no fault divorce and their lgbt neighbors book club or something.

>Hurr durr nobles got to fuck the bride

>it's a "the church prevented the advancement of dcience in the middle ages" episode

it asspains soft """"intellectual""" men, which is the entirety of this board

>Operation cóndor is the reason why South America is fucked up, if just America didn't support the coup d'etat against democratic governments, today south america would be first world.

That shit triggered me so hard

>muslims have never invented anything

tiger tanks were good

crusades were responses to Muslim conquests

Alexander was ________

war is just big climatic battles

mediaeval swords were dull

knights were just dumb brutes

Crusaders were all dumb zealots

the Catholic Church opposed science

gold standard was good

i think the greatest general ever was Robert E Lee

the civil war was not about slavery

christians never had sectarian violence

Columbus was a penniless noble explorer and proved the earth was round

native peoples were all hippies

poor peasant farmers were all noble kind people with folksy charm

gunpowder ended the era of knights

pre modern armies were just mobs of peasant conscripts

the army with bigger numbers always win

"human wave tactics"

all mechanized treaded vehicles are tanks

fascists made the trains run on time

Africa never had civilization

Spanish defeated Aztec due to horses and technology

the Native Americans were always nomadic "savages" who were wasting the land

modern standard of living is due to "capitalism"

China has 5000 years of uninterrupted history

Mao was not really responsible for the famines

America could have won Vietnam but was stabbed in the back by internal traitors

the Germans lost because America opened the western front

German's V2 rocket was a powerful weapon.

Germany was on the verge of making a war winning super weapon.

Mongols won due to sheer numbers.

Horse archers were unbeatable.

the Spartans were the best Greeks

Technology is pretty much just like the civ games tech tree

history is all about progress

things always work out in the end, with the good side winning. after all, those that i share most of my culture/norms with won.

the fall of Rome was bad.

people in the past were idiot mud farmers with bad teeth

people in the past were just like me with funny clothing

people in the past would think i was a god/wizard/witch

history is subjective and just written by the winners, who can say who is right?

history is just dates.

Someone said they think its impossible to eradicate bullying. Some genius replied with the following just now:

>not really. its pretty obvious where education went wrong if you compare to public education now to 100 years ago

wew lad

I always thought that medieval wars did have a significant peasant militia component. Am I wrong?

half of these are true

t. soft-ass pussy who is triggered by the truth

2222503
No, you're not wrong
You are wrong in the half of that sentences

Testosterone levels have indeed declined like crazy since WW2. That statement you attempted to ridicule holds therefore some truth. Now you have only madde a fool of yourself, OP.

>>Sex outside of marriage rarely happened before the sexual revolution

Sex outside marriage happened. Nobody denies that.

The average girl (as opposed to marginalized outliers) having 10 different cocks inside her before 30 didn't.

The cock carousel is a modern invention.

Go whiteknight somewhere else, beta cuck.

what I love about this picture is the fact that reddit-tier morons unironically believe this to be true

Heres my Veeky Forums pet peeve: morons who think testosterone is a magic 'manliness' drug that is completely positive.

High testosterone levels without similarly high levels of supporting secondary hormones are purely dangerous. It can cause paranoia, memory problems, stunt your growth, heart problems, etc.

Even with the secondary hormone increases testosterome can cause balding and mood swings, as well as being correlated with blood pressure problems.

Testosterone levels on their own arent a good way to measure how much of a 'real man' someone is.

iirc they were part time soldiers, part time farmers, like the armies of Republican Rome. they also had professional man at arms. peasant levies were just a waste that would die: you wanted peasants working to bring your income, not trying to get them to stand in a line.

most medieval conflict was smaller scale as well and could last a long time, and primarily was about using raids, which meant bloating your force with shitty chaff did nothing but give you logistical nightmares.

You are completely retarded if you think promiscuity is a modern invention. Holy fuck.

Go outside, get laid, throw out your fedora. It'll make you feel better.

FIGHT ME

Generalized, socially accepted promiscuity is.

Now go take care of your girlfriend's son, I'm sure he needs something.

If promiscuty exist since ever, why is called promiscuty and no just sex?

Checkmate sluts

> cock carousel
Was never real and doesn't exist today.

Because sex is an act and promiscuty is behavior, retard.

its just another word for whoring around which women objectively do today and in the past as well

>ill call him a cuck while making unsubstantiated statements I "feel" are true!

>there isn't anything wrong with women being sexually free? You misogynistic fedora virgin! xDD

Far more women do it today than before.

wow! you really shown us.

Promiscuty=polygamy!=West Civilization

>Testosterone levels on their own arent a good way to measure how much of a 'real man' someone is.

then what is, there's a massive correlation with high test levels and masculine traits like athleticism, facial hair, wealth acquisition, risk taking, ...

...

>Using history as a political tool to further your agenda, rather than studying it for its academic merits

>I'll call him names because it will make me forget how much of a cuck I am!

> Promiscuty=polygamy
It isn't. Check meaning of words, before pulling the equations out of your ass.

masculinity is an honor/shame based normative system that dictates socially acceptable male behavior, and varies accordingly

Being a real men means that you are providing to your children. The more your provide to more children the more real man you are.

I see /pol/ has arrived. What took you guys so long?

The trouble with Veeky Forums is that I can never tell if these r9k types are joking or not.

That whole intellectual stagnation caused by clerical fascism for 1000 years was no big deal. - t. Christfags

>the army with bigger numbers always win
>the Catholic Church opposed science
>knights were just dumb brutes
>all mechanised treaded vehicles are tanks
and especially this one
>fascists made the trains run on time
>mfw

I see /leftypol/ has arrived. What took you guys so long?

Truly a powerful and compelling response. Consider me redpilled.

> I am not even smart enough to come up with original insult.
Are you from reddit or what, fellow slut hater?

>everyone who doesnt like my fringe political opinion must have the exact opposite fringe political opinion

Life must be easy when you make things so black and white.

So?

BTFO

Moral isn't black and white, it's male and female. Virtous for ojne side and sexually depraved for another.

Never forget