> I think we will see a class of people living hand-to-mouth on whatever the government will give them, and they will always vote to get more.
Really doesn't make sense when you think about it.
>More and more people do not put up with it. They often end up on disability, on drugs. I see it everyday working in a property management company. Probably 60-70% or more of our units are rented to people on some form of support (ODSP, Ontario Works, etc). Most of them smoke, drink, and do drugs excessively. It's very sad to see an under-class grow and grow within your own city.
At the turn of the century, and until halfway about, the state paid for things called sanitariums which you could voluntarily be admitted to. They were largely self-contained. The hope was that people had an escape hatch they could go and somehow get well so they could rejoin society. Many did not of course, because psychological problems are real and prognoses are not really good for those kinds of problems.
Physical problems counted as wellas old age. Really, any kind of infirmity.
The Sanitariums had a small staff. Trusted residents fulfilled the different functions of the sanitarium. You could work as a janitor, a gardener, a handyman, a plumber, a cook, a launderer. Or, if you couldn't, you didn't have to.
Society viewed these places as a welcome burden compared to the alternative- which is what you see today.
Today, there is no where to go. So your "under-class" that "grows" in your city is really the flotsam which drifts from the periphery to the center. There is no social safety net now- and those earlier generations would be shocked to learn that we had become so callous- to treat people like they were disposable instead of treatable. They would be baffled- as to why we insisted they be forced to live in the streets and parks and underpasses and squats.
They would no doubt condemn us for these things.