Prove that bringing a child into this world is anything but a selfish immoral act.
Protip; you literally cannot.
Antinatalism
Owen Davis
Other urls found in this thread:
macmillandictionary.com
twitter.com
Isaac Cooper
>Be fruitful and multiply
Caleb Butler
If it's that horrible they can always just kill themselves
Xavier Rivera
That's a sin
Joseph Ward
>Causing unnecessary suffering
Isaac Hill
>Prove the negative of an opinion.
This is inspired shitposting.
Jose Stewart
>creating an independent being out of love
>selfish
Pick 1
>suffering negates the value of life
>suffering can't be overcome
Wew a lot of logical fallacies here lad
Isaac Howard
>Reading comprehension
It says "anything but" for a reason, retard. It isn't asking you to prove a negative.
Grayson Clark
Anti natalists are satanists that hate white people
Josiah Gray
...
Jaxson Cox
>Implying you can quantify any of that
Whereas you can certainly state that one must suffer in the sense of constantly trying to be fed and sustain shelter. You cannot say the same thing about overcoming suffering.
Sebastian Flores
How is bringing a thing that leeches your resources/time and that you are obliged to take care of "selfish"? Foolish and immoral maybe, but selfish?
Parker Ward
I don't understand your point. How is quantifiability a valid measure of anything to do with life?
Carson Cox
*bringing a thing into this world that
Andrew Williams
Do you not quantify pleasure and pain experiences?
Do you not do this with any food you eat or event you are considering attending?
Adrian Reyes
>"anything but" is not effectively a synonym for "not."
Truly inspired.
Alexander Campbell
So you're doing a utilitarian calculation of a life and conclude that on balance suffering is greater over a lifetime therefore reproduction is wrong?
Lincoln Price
>My own arbitrary selection of a synonym
Learn how language works, retard.
Alexander Moore
No, that would be unquantifiable.
Dylan Fisher
macmillandictionary.com
You can stop now. You won't, but you can.
Luke Reed
I don't get you point.
Suffering is universal. Everyone suffers.
Suffering has a cause.
The cause can be stopped.
Suffering can end.
Quantifiability is irrelevant.
Luke Thompson
Different user but that's not how the phrase is being use. You're a brainlet.
Juan Rivera
Literally what Eraserhead is about desu
Ryan Ward
Learn how language works, retard.
The post clearly asks you to in effect prove that bringing a child into the world is something besides or contrary to suffering.
Please take your autistic STEMtard uniform interpretation of language back to Veeky Forums.
Reply and watch me beat you up, dork.
Jaxon Stewart
You just admitted that suffering is universal and in the next breath admitted that such suffering can be ended but this is not a guarantee.
Therefore it is more apt to avoid bringing a child into this world as their suffering is guaranteed but their emancipation from such suffering is not.
Kevin Hill
>not existing = not suffering
Unquantifiable.
The Four Noble Truths are undeniable sorry lad.
Eli Johnson
I miss when positivists were the prolific shitposter on this board
Hunter Rivera
>How is kidnapping somebody that leeches your resources/time and that you are obliged to take care of "selfish"? Foolish and immoral maybe, but selfish?
Charles Thomas
>Unironically being a descriptivist.
You're trash.
Ryan Thompson
I eat Positivist plebs for breakfast.
Elijah Howard
That's not what I am.
You're just a buffoon that doesn't understand my particular language game :^)
No retort besides an ad hominem?
Jaxon Wilson
...