What human being came the closest in history

to being the ubermensch?

ubermensch is a spook, Nietzsche died alone poor and weak

...

/thread

Not even memeing

kek

whoever is the master in a master/slave relationship is the ubermensch
so plenty of people have been ubermenschen

...

...

...

Someone have a more interesting definition of ubermensch?

So I can know what to post.

Sometimes spooks are useful, it's identifying whether it is or isn't is the key.

>Manlet
No

Stalin

Jesus Christ
Mohammed
Charlemange
Gengis khan
Luther
Robespierre
Rhodes
Lenin
Kissinger
Elon Musk

>Jesus Christ

Hw the eff was he a ubermensch during his lifetime ? A jew carpenter, ,most probably a bastard who was betrayed for 30 sillvers and was hung out to dry half naked is a ubermencsh now ?

Fredrick the Great. Even fits with the German/Prussian idea of übermensch.

>Spouting old tired anlgo propaganda lies

t. Retard

His self-devised system of values changed the course of human history to such a degree that, had he never lived, the modern world would likely be completely unrecognizable.

Goethe

Stalin? Please, he was 5'4", no master race coming from his genes

Being an ubermensch is not about conquering a lot of land.It is about creating your own system of values.Jesus did that.Now you should read before posting and leave your fedora in another place

You mean, what st Paul did.

Holy fuck.

Stalin was 5'4"? I literally didn't believe you and had to google it to make sure.

Jesus Christ, FDR with his spaghetti legs in his fucking wheelchair was taller than this midget. How the fuck did him and Churchill not just bants all day long about the short fuck?

Ubermensch is a teleological framework you winkers

Paul was simply a result of Jesus. His influence was just in the interpretation of a belief system already established before him. It may be that his thought strayed significantly from the actual thought of Jesus, but the fact of the matter is that Paul can't really be classified as an "ubermensch" because his thinking was at least based on Jesus' own, assuming it wasn't just a direct and accurate interpretation of it. The line of influence still begins at Jesus in either case and as a direct result, Jesus is inevitably deified rather than Paul.

Reading a few excerpts from Thus Spoke Zarathustra would give you the best idea.

Jesus' philosophy was basically reductionist Judaism combined with the works of Hillel the Elder.

Stirner

You're fucking retarded

If you're going by the Nietzschean definition, then somebody we don't know.