What african country bar egypt has the best ancient history?
Ethiopia?
What african country bar egypt has the best ancient history?
Ethiopia?
Gabon, obviously.
Tunis
Kenya for being the cradle of mankind.
Tunis for Carthage.
Algeria for the Jugurthine War.
Sorry for the Euro-centrism but what can I say, I like my Romans.
>Kenya
I thought the oldest humans were in Ethiopia?
Only Egypt and Ethiopia have history, the rest have nothing worth writing about
Tunis (Carthage) obviously
Tunis was a Semitic Phoenician colony, hence why you can even see in the name origin similarity to Arabic
Qar Dhaj = Qarya Jadida = new village
Tunis, Morocco, Algeria, Libya
Whatever non sub Saharans
South Africa, Morroco and Algeria. Angola is interesting for the civil war and Rhodesia Zimbabwe for the Bush War, but thats about it.
And Ethiopia of course.
>Those Flag
I puked
Somalia. Bit hard to do archaeology in the area today though!
Why though?
They're mostly decent.
Angola.
We wuz Kongo n shiet.
Rhodesia.. South Africa.. other places..
Morocco
Benin and Morocco
This.
The kong empire
Everywhere where the phoenicians were.
In no real order, Ethiopia/Eritrea, Morocco, Tunisia and Sudan. Nigeria is a runner up.
Somalia, Mali, Algeria and Kenya/Tanzania are good too.
Zimbabwe, Ghana and Angola are okay.
How far is ancient?
I'd say Tunisian, Eritrea/Northern Ethiopia, Northern Sudan.
Punt land might count as Somalia so thats cool I guess
Ethiopia.
A kingdom, an empire, an execption, and the bane of all pasta
Africa was prehistorical until foreigners showed up.
no written languages=no records=no history
if you disagree retake 6th grade history.
and obviously we're excluded Mediterranean africa.
Tunis(Carthage)
Not even close.
I didn't know they had a massive parthenon at the back, why do they only show pictures of that tiny cube church
>Africa was prehistorical until foreigners showed up.
>no written languages=no records=no history
>if you disagree retake 6th grade history.
>and obviously we're excluded Mediterranean africa.
en.wikipedia.org
>inb4 Arabs brought it
>The Ge'ez language is no longer universally thought of, as previously assumed, to be an offshoot of Sabaean or Old South Arabian, and there is some linguistic (though not written) evidence of Semitic languages being spoken in Eritrea and Ethiopia since approximately 2000 BC
and
en.wikipedia.org
Thats why we have documents from Nubia and Aksum
The oldest Christian manuscript with pictures is from Ethiopia written in Geez
Kenya/Tanganyika. They play an extremely important role in the history of the Indian Ocean which means they're extremely important for the Middle East, Persia and India and thus the world. I don't think any other region can quite compete.
Not ancient, but still interesting.
Cameroon
The king that made that is really cool
en.wikipedia.org
If only he had been around earlier in the history
UNESCO built a big metal frame over it to protect it from the rain, so it's hard to get a good photo anymore. Pic related is from before they put it up.
The small one is in much better condition and easy to photograph. There are also a bunch of other ones, though they vary in condition, and even more scattered throughout the country.
I wouldn't even both replying to that bait.
But, Arabians did bring writing to Ethiopia. That article is about the language, not the writing. Ge'ez writing was developed in Aksum from the earlier Sabaean script introduced centuries before.
Keep in mind that every script used today outside of East Asia is derived from a common Egyptian ancestor. Ge'ez is actually unique as the only still-used script derived from Egyptian but not Phoenician.
They also had really comfy architecture.
Yeah language as we know it came from like 5 sources
Sumerian, Egyptian, Harappan, Mayan and Chinese I believe
Everything else borrows from these
But it did develop into a distinct Abugida style script. I was pointing out that the language attached to it was independent.
I meant written language not language itself
This shit's why Africa is objectively the best continent.
/pol/ has it all backwards. The shit is what MAKES it good.
You do know that archeological evidence counts right? So does oral history. For written documentation, there's guys like Ibn Batuta and Ibn Khaldun. How about artifacts? Why do the rules suddenly change when negroes are involved?
Sudan
Is this a valid excuse to get the history wrong?
ethiopian kangz
Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia