I notice a trend where the left accuses someone of being a "fascist" its literally the opposite of how the right tends to label anything it dislikes "marxist or communist".
Why don't people actually fucking read Evola or actually delve into what Fascism actually is....people think it just means "dictatorship" or something
>evola
>fascist
2/10, here's your reply
Evola was not a fascist...
he literally wrote a book called "Fascism viewed from the right"
he was a traditionalist, and saw himself as being even more radical than Fascists
>wahhhh wahhhhh I'm being oppressed for being a straight white male who posts about their love of papa hilter on a rangoon radioplay relayboard ;_;
It's actually an underwater Norwegian shoe throwing forum son
Well I am a white male
my race has produced geniuses like Sir Isaac Newton, Galileo, Shakespeare, Mozart, Beethoven, Michelangelo, Goethe
we produced monuments like this
what has the black race produced *crickets*
nothing
literally nothing, the black race is the only race on the planet to have any worthwhile contributions
>niggers
>accomplishments
don't make me laugh
you messed that up...your saying that the black race is the only race that has accomplished anything
Mexicans and all of South America literally nothing good came from there that isn't wrapped in a tortilla
dumb animeposter
well the Aztecs had some nice architectural structures
They are extinct tho
redpill me Veeky Forums
were'nt fascism in Italy and Germany both born from nationalistic socialist parties with goals to nationalize economies and bring more power to those governments?
then fascism would be a leftist type of government? and closer to communism than anything really
>Marx invented socialism and communism meme
This meme dies here you uneducated incel
>fascist regime without a dictator
name 1 tho
i'm actually very curious.
put link of something to read, please
Fascist would be described as right wing read Benito's works
>redpill me
i don't know about italian fascism but nazism only makes sense if you consider the political context of prewar germany. there were many different political parties and interest groups that were in conflict e.g. communists, the democratic socialists, capitalists/industralists, the middle class who had all been but destroyed, junkers/aristocrats, nationalists, the military and disgruntled veterns, etc. no one could make this shit fight work then enter hitler with an ideology that can apparently unite all these different parties: national socialism. it doesn't mean anything, i think it's function is to appeal to as many of these groups as possible, hence the apparent contradiction between right wing nationalism/fascism and the self-appointed moniker of left wing socialism. it's only left in name to appeal to that large part of the population who still voted for the socialist govt.
asking if it was left or right misses the point. it was a weird hybrid with aspects of both.
but fascism opposes everthing about the free-market.
what's the difference between fasicms and authoritarianism?
If you were to say where fascism would be it would be in the middle with a huge combination of both right and left
It's a rotten shame that Hitler of all people became the poster boy of fascism rather than d'Annunzio. A movement based on futurism and steeped in culture became a watered-down counterfeit to be disseminated amongst the masses.
>white race
>black race
stop
They built the Whitehouse. Involuntarily, of course. Considering how similar humans are to one another one can't help but wonder how many Isaac Newtons, Galileos, Shakespeares, Mozarts, Beethovens, Michelangelos, and Goethes languished in a cotton field repressed their entire lives without even being given a chance to make good of their talents. Centuries of repression followed by many decades of a white conformity culture which was openly hostile to them and we think there's something wrong with them for taking more than a few generations to cope with the sheer impact that colonial subjugation had on them.
And the reason civilization never flourished in Sub-Saharan Africa is because of how inhospitable the ecosystem was, the high prevalence of highly aggressive animals who are inherently untameable with respect to their Eurasian and American peers and its extreme isolation on the other side of the Sahara desert cutting it off from wider human trade.