Darwinism

Because you're around.

As you speak this moment, superbugs impervious to every type of antibiotics are decimating lives. This is exactly the type of thing evolution predicts.

No that's called breeding. Artificial selection. Which, as Darwin points out, is in the Bible.

Not the same thing as natural selection. Evolution is bullshit, do some reading.

It's usually a red flag when someone calls anything related to evolutionary biology "Darwinism". No one in science uses that fucking term.

hahaha how can africa have same time as europe?

But How Can Artificial Selection Be Real If Evolution Is Not Real?

That's called a medicinal improvement, and the theory of evolution is so unproductive that literally every retard who believes in the flimsy theory uses it to justify their worldview.

...

How is that a medicinal improvement? Are you hight right now?

high*

>organism which is better suited to it's environment lives longer, and therefore breeds more.
explain how this is bullshit

>darwinism
t. Joe
Tell us how your pastor tolja about the dangers of degenerousy, "darwinizum" and how tha librull left will take over and spread communizum
Bait better next time.

>communism
kek.

Evolution is a lie. Watch this to find out why

youtube.com/watch?v=mtBz1roiQR8

Go to bed Trey

I repeat, we should all just create a world based on Tolkien's works and live in fantasy forever.

Will Darwinians ever recover?
youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504

>On the origin of life
>The theory of evolution literally has nothing to do with the origin of life
>tadaaa, no new life in a jar of peanut butter
I love this video.

has there been an influx of christcucks recently

I think you're referring more to Herbert Spencer's social Darwinist theories (although I don't think it was he who coined that term.) I think that coupled with late nihilist philosophy (perhaps working off De Sade from much earlier) lead to the social declines that you're speaking of. I hardly think Charles Darwin had much to do with it, other than in a very basic linguistic sense.

Explain how the various "kinds" of dog and wolf came to exist from a single pair on Noah's Ark.

Slight gradations occur. That is implicit in artificial selection. That was the point of my post.

It isn't natural selection though.

What do you think evolution is, retard? Slight gradations, compounded generation after generation. As I say, this is simply a fact, even Christian fundies accept that evolution HAPPENS, they simply disagree on what causes it.

Because people were desperately looking for a way to throw God out of their lives.

Rebellious attitude at a time when secret societies were steering the western world into a godless society. The nihilist philosophies were there, the Copernican model was there, all that was left is the metaphysical narrative.

Darwin made being an atheist intellectually fulfilling, by concocting a world-view that directly contradicts and attacks Genesis.

The most shocking part is how this unprovable, unscientific religion has pretty much taken over education and brainwashes our children.

Satan is very clever. He knows if people deny Genesis, then they will also be skeptical of Jesus and the gospel which saves you from hell.

>t.simpleton

t. buttblasted fedora mad that evolution has been proven wrong

>t.literal halfwit

Both figuratively and literally what the fuck.

One would have to go to quite a stretch to find a connection to "Communism", "Perversion", "Materialism" and "Promiscuity".

But, do go on, please show us how Darwinism is responsible for Communism.

Karl Marx praised Darwin in his letters.

Evolutionism is the world-view which Communism (aswell as Nazism) are based on. It's the foundation.

If you accept Biblical Christianity, you cannot possibly believe in the nonsense of Communism. It is inherently an atheistic ideology.

>Karl Marx praised Darwin in his letters.
And Hitler was an avid vegetarian and countless religious figureheads committed terrible crimes. So what?

>Evolutionism is the world-view which Communism (aswell as Nazism) are based on. It's the foundation.
Well, you just repeated your claim. Elaborate.

>Evolution is Communism's base because Marx praised it.

Not an argument moron. They do not even overlap, unless you deny that History is real.

>As well Nazism.

Nice Godwin there. The idea of he "master tace" is, by itself, a contradiction to what Evolution actually says (namely "this species' breed exists right here right now because the condictions for it to thrive are ight. If condictions hanges, another breed/species May be more suited.")

Like Christianity isn't a proletarian revolutionary ideology

You have no clue what Christianity is about.

Your statement is cringe-worthy and reeks of edgy atheist rebellion.

There is a quote going around in The Descent of Man where Charles Darwin advocates for Eugenics.

Just so you know.

>It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.
Mark 10:25

>FACT of evolution

Repeating a lie does not make it true, dumbass.

No matter how much you *want* evolution to be true, science and archeology say otherwise.

>With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination. We build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.

>The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which was originally acquired as part of the social instincts, but subsequently rendered, in the manner previously indicated, more tender and more widely diffused. Nor could we check our sympathy, even at the urging of hard reason, without deterioration in the noblest part of our nature. The surgeon may harden himself whilst performing an operation, for he knows that he is acting for the good of his patient; but if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit, with an overwhelming present evil. Hence we must bear without complaining the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; but there appears to be at least one check in steady action, namely the weaker and inferior members of society not marrying so freely as the sound; and this check might be indefinitely increased, though this is more to be hoped for than expected.

>archeology
Works on a completely different scale of time than evolution.

Gimme that part and show and show me how it ties to the currently-unacceptable eugenics.

"Christ took this occasion to speak to his disciples about the difficulty of the salvation of those who have abundance of this world. Those who thus eagerly seek the wealth of the world, will never rightly prize Christ and his grace. Also, as to the greatness of the salvation of those who have but little of this world, and leave it for Christ. The greatest trial of a good man's constancy is, when love to Jesus calls him to give up love to friends and relatives. Even when gainers by Christ, let them still expect to suffer for him, till they reach heaven. Let us learn contentment in a low state, and to watch against the love of riches in a high one. Let us pray to be enabled to part with all, if required, in Christ's service, and to use all we are allowed to keep in his service."

"Of course, it is impossible for a camel to go through a needle's eye, and the Lord's words are therefore hyperbole, used for the sake of emphasizing the difficulty. As Turlington put it, "The `impossible' figure is given, not to be taken literally, but to emphasize how hard it is."[31] In view of the Lord's plain statement in Mark 10:27, all efforts to understand such a thing as possible must fail."

agapegeek.com/2013/06/30/bible-answers-was-the-eye-of-the-needle-in-mark-1025-a-literal-or-figurative-description-and-what-does-it-mean/

10 seconds in google

Like I said, no-one disputes that evolution happens, not even Ken Ham and his ilk. It IS a fact, you can pretend to be too stupid to understand this but you're the one who is lying. Not that I'm even slightly surprised to find a Christian liar, you """people""" have no shame and no decency.

So the Bible contains lies, thanks for clearing that up.

...

Thanks for blowing your cover.

Next time try to be more subtle.

>Modern man =/= most of nature.

WOW, so revolting 'n' shit!
>Literally trying to treat Darwin's beliefs in Malthusianism like "kill this guy because his Bose would ruin the general pool"-tier eugenics.

I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that a man of the XIXth century from a certain background doesn't think too highly of poor people!

>taking advice on science from someone who doesn't know the difference between archaeology and paleontology
hmmmmm

this definition of weak isn't very good

Below 145 is weak

How could god have misspoke and said impossible but meant difficult? Why would god not say difficult?

It is sad that our children are being brainwashed into the cult of atheism.

Propaganda.
Memes are propaganda.

Is "Bald" a hair colore?

The post was intended to contradict his point. Darwin's saying that forcibly applying survival of the fittest to humans defies everything noble about us.

>read that chapter of James
Sounds Gnostic desu.

>biologists who don't agree that evolution is fact
???

If evolution were wrong then DNA would not exist as that is the very backbone of all evolution.

>1 timothy 4:7
>They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. 4 For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, 5 because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer.
So dietitians are the anti-Christ?