German mistreatment of Soviet prisoners of war

Does anyone dispute the mistreatment and mass deaths of Soviet POWs under German control? If so why is the Holocaust seen as so impossible to some people?

Also, why does no one ever talk about this?

>It is estimated that at least 3.3 million Soviet POWs died in Nazi custody, out of 5.7 million. This figure represents a total of 57% of all Soviet POWs and may be contrasted with 8,300 out of 231,000 British and U.S. prisoners, or 3.6%. About 5% of the Soviet prisoners who died were of Jewish ethnicity.[5]

>The most deaths took place between June 1941 and January 1942, when the Germans killed an estimated 2.8 million Soviet POWs primarily through deliberate starvation,[6] exposure, and summary execution, in what has been called, along with the Rwandan Genocide, an instance of "the most concentrated mass killing in human history (...) eclipsing the most exterminatory months of the Jewish Holocaust".[7] By September 1941, the mortality rate among Soviet POWs was in the order of 1% per day.[8] According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM), by the winter of 1941, "starvation and disease resulted in mass death of unimaginable proportions".[9] This deliberate starvation, leading many desperate prisoners to resort to acts of cannibalism,[7] was Nazi policy in spite of food being available,[10] in accordance to the Hunger Plan developed by the Reich Minister of Food Herbert Backe. For the Germans, Soviet POWs were expendable: they consumed calories needed by others and, unlike Western POWs, were considered to be subhuman.[11]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_mistreatment_of_Soviet_prisoners_of_war#Death_toll

Other urls found in this thread:

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html
youtube.com/watch?v=UnV4Aee1RTg
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Does anyone dispute the mistreatment and mass deaths of Soviet POWs under German control?


Naziboos, but not sane people.

> If so why is the Holocaust seen as so impossible to some people?


Because they're the same retarded naziboos.


I mean for fuck's sake, the amount of killing per day was higher in the Rwandan genocide than it was in the Holocaust, and that was with a bunch of people primarily armed with machetes. The ability of the Nazi state to kill people in mass quantities was never in doubt.

It's okay the German race at this very moment is being raped out of existence by Africans and Arabs. Alls well that ends well.

At least they treated the western pows better? How can they tell what Jewish ethnicity looks like?

>Also, why does no one ever talk about this?
Because neither Germans nor Russians are cunty enough to still call out each others faults. That job falls to the anglos who are still envious to have neither invented nazism nor communism.

>Does anyone dispute the mistreatment and mass deaths of Soviet POWs under German control?
No, but the number of 3.3 million as well as the assertion that it was intentional are disputed.

>t.anglo

Germans and Russians hate one another and absolutely continue to use the war among the many sources of mutual antipathy.

>Soviet sources

Quatsch

>If so why is the Holocaust seen as so impossible to some people?

It's seeing Soviet POWs that make you realize that jews were probably never gassed but just interned en mass with many dying of disease and hunger because of the war (just like Soviet pows)

Except Soviet PoWs were gassed as well. The first gassings at Auschwitz, at the improvised "Red House" were done on Soviet PoWs, not Jews.

If you say so, that has to be true...

>why is the Holocaust seen as so impossible to some people?
because they're a dedicated /pol/itical shitposting force

Weren't these Jewish POWs?

All according to plan. Tis for the best.

Are you a retard
There were no gassings at Auschwitz, it was a concentration camp not a death camp
Even lying Weasel admited not existing death camps in Germany proper unlike he hsd told earlier

>The first experimental gassing with Zyklon B took place at Auschwitz I on September 3, 1941, in the cellar of Block 11 using 600 Soviet POWs and 250 other prisoners who were sick and no longer able to work.
>Auschwitz: Chronology. September 3, 1941. Holocaust Encyclopedia. USHMM.org.

Check urself before you wreck urself

There's a shit ton of evidence of gassing in auschwitz.
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html

>Even lying Weasel admited not existing death camps in Germany proper unlike he hsd told earlier

Your daily reminder that Auschwitz was in Poland.

>Tis

shut up autist

NEARLY 3 MILLION IN 6 MONTHS WHAT THE FUCK. CRYING RIGHT NOW

Because they were digusting Bolshevik subhumans. No one cares.

/Thread.

Not that guy but Zyklon B was tested on Russian POWs.

...

>White, blue eyed Slavics died early in the war
>later in the war turkic mongols went and raped a bunch of German women.

>He's actually citing the Leuchter report!

top kek.

>this picture again
Fucking /pol/ newfags.

...

gas chambers are completely irrelevant to the subject at hand

>retarded stormfag gets his historical facts from infopics
What a surprise!
Forensic studies carried by the Cracow Forensic Institute did find evidence of zyklon b on gas chambers (in fact, this is mentioned in the link from the post you quoted). Your pic is probably a reference to the leuchter report, which has been refuted to a degree that even neonazis have stopped referencing it (carried out by a bachelor in arts (lel) that didn't know the concentration differences for delousing and killing people, the conditions gas chambers had been through, nor the correct methodology for the study, and was later refuted by the same lab he worked with).

The funny thing is I can read the german labelling and it clearly says it's poison gas.

Got any more of those sweet holohoax proofs?

While that's true it would also be a Giftgas for lice so that label doesn't matter for the retarded discussion going on.

>The Jews, Slavs, Roma, JW's, Gays, Polacks, Americans, Soviets, and Germans are all in on a huge decades spanning conspiracy just to make Nazis seem even more evil

This shit is right up there with thinking the Moon is a hologram

I feel its easy to deny the holocaust these days because millenials simply cannot comprehend the amount of deaths caused by ww2

Yes, actually there is an argument. If you had an IQ in the triple digits, you'd see it. Since you don't, I'll spell it out for you.

Claims that because of the lack of prussian blue staining, ergo, there was no Zyklon B at Auschwitz, ergo no gassings. The only "support" for this claim stems from Leuchter's extremely amateur investigation of the camp, which is discredited. OTHER investigations, such as the one the Forensic Institute of Cracow did in 1994, did in fact find evidence of Hydrogen Cyanide, the active ingredient in Zyklon B.

You are either misinformed, or more likely a /pol/tard.

Who the hell stuffs prisoners into low-level hopper cars?

The prisoners can literally just climb over the wall and hop off the train.

Did they really say let the bodies hit the floor or is that a meme

to be on the run on your own in an enemy country were the majority of the population would be rather eager to see you swing. Awesome idea.
It worked. Have a look at the death counts.

If you have to ask this you shouldn't be on the internet unsupervised.

They actually experimented came up with the decision to use Zyklon B after killing several hundred POWs with it.

Later, the extermination camps at Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec, and Chelmno were built by Soviet POWs and "christened" with the murder of the entire surviving workforce.

t. didn't live through the early 2000s

>Why does noone talk about this
Soviets killed a third of the germans they got their hands on. Both sides really hated each other and needed the food for themselves in this exitential struggle so its overshadowed by the more irrational masskillings if the time.

Better to risk your life on the run then face certain death.

Also, Soviet POWs were the frequent instigators of prison riots at Concentration and Extermination Camps (such as at Sobibór), so it's not like they didn't have the daring to do so.

>Soviets killed a third of the germans they got their hands on.
Whose numbers are you using?

Quick glance on Wikipedia.

...would suggest 18%

I would guess that the mass starvation of prisoners wasn't necessarily intentional, but due to the total shitshow that was German logistics during Barbarossa, not to mention indifference as to whether "communist subhumans" live or die

>Better to risk your life on the run then face certain death.
Meditate on the fact that you lead a pampered life and your biggest fear is losing wifi.
> it's not like they didn't have the daring to do so.
Acting out of a group takes considerably less courage than acting on your own.

Is the 18% the soviet statistic?
West german sources say roughly 1 million from 3 and they probably could check better by looking whose relatives didnt return.

If you cancerous tripfag twat would ponder for a moment that they did crammed them in and thus probably knew what they were doing being ww2 soldiers and all, its pretty pointless for you to argue against them doing it.
The why and how is probably solved by a guy with a rifle sitting nearby to discourage any unwanted movements.

>Is the 18% the soviet statistic?
Yes, it's the "documented deaths".

>West german sources
I am afraid those don't exist, only documents on the issue are from NKVD. That leaves in guessing range between 1/5 to 1/3.

> Overmans believes that the deaths of 363,000 POWs in Soviet captivity can be confirmed be the files of Deutsche Dienststelle (WASt), in addition he maintains that it seems entirely plausible, while not provable, that 700,000 German military personnel listed as missing actually died in Soviet custody

You mean death rate of German PoW taken by Soviets?
Consider this that they spend 5-10 years in work camps in country that was devastated by war and in conditions similar to other political or even criminal prisoners.
Also Soviets probably execute German military personnel recruited from occupied/liberated USSR territory as traitors. So Baltic Germans, Baltic, Ukies and others who join Germans get heavier end of the stick and weren't treated as enemy PoWs(but worse).
Also for a brief moments when Soviets archives were open it was confirmed that Soviets data more than less was actually true.
On the other hand I am really interesting in "Other Losses" which count German military personnel taken by USA after capitulation whose USA didn't label as PoWs and supposedly starved upon open sky like Germans did to Soviets.

youtube.com/watch?v=UnV4Aee1RTg

Pretty fucked up 2bh

>Also, why does no one ever talk about this?
Because we only care about humans.

Soviet were barbarians

>implying you can't just give the kraut bastard one good shove and he's under the wheels

You know that Russians can be Jews?

Meditate on the fact that letting you're a fucking coward.

The 1 million dead POW figure for American POW camps presented in Other Losses is completely false and has been debunked.

If i keep saying it maybe it will be true and crusades will stop being an obsolete military concept.

are jews sims?

Not funny.

Why were the same ventilation systems used in the camp's delousing chambers also found in the same structures those crazy jews claim were used to gas Jews?????

West German sources can be suspect for those claims, as they believed far more prisoners had been taken by the Soviets than the Soviets actually took. I'd have to dig around my sources for real numbers, but in the final year of the war as the country began to break down, the German war machine began to have a hard time keeping track of its soldiers. You had overreporting of everything from numbers of men available in units to numbers of civilians pressed into service. With these being the only real records West Germany had after the war, they were convinced for quite a while that the Soviets were keeping many POWs in work camps well after they were all supposedly returned in 1955.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but Soviet sources might actually be more reliable in this instance.

Yes, I am. The Russian PoWs on which Zyklon B was tested weren't though.
Are really all burgers retarded?

USA! USA!

Unlike the Allied ones, are based on 50 tonnes of confiscated wartime evidence.

False, they've continued to fight on, its just that the more Asiatic members of the army were intentionally picked for the task of impending rape, to humiliate and defile the concept of German racial ideal.

West German sources have made Large variations in the claimed death toll, which fueled the controversy. In March 1945, the German government ordered its press to publish a falsified casualty figure of 200,000 for the Dresden raids, and death toll estimates as high as 500,000 have been given. The city authorities at the time estimated no more than 25,000 victims, a figure that subsequent investigations supported, including a 2010 study commissioned by the city council, Western Germany had merely continued to repeat that slander, so there's that.

The Germans also raped far more women than the Russians did, but that rarely gets mentioned for some reason.

There are no hard numers on that. The Germans did rape. They also had bordellos though to keep soldiers healthy. The Russians raped as a means of war.

What fucking ventilation systems? It's a fucking basement with a wooden door.

Different mentality. In East woman would ever speak of rape, because she would have trouble finding a husband.

*never

They were not obliged by any treaty to treat Russian prisoners well (and Germans being taken prisoner by Russians didn't have a great life ahead of them either), and when short on resources due to being blockaded and bombed, it shouldn't be surprising that the well-being of POWs isn't the first concern. Also, how well Russians were treated also depended heavily on who took them prisoner. e.g. a Russian pilot being taken prisoner by the Luftwaffe would have a significantly better life than an infantryman.