Few questions about Saxons Veeky Forums (probably later period ones)

Few questions about Saxons Veeky Forums (probably later period ones)

Did they paint their shields?

If they did paint their shields what designs did they paint on them?

Did they attempts to create uniform designs on their shields, especially for the higher-tier Thanes/hearth guard?

Did hearth guard/warriors have standardized clothing colours (proto-uniforms?) or were they free to put whatever they wanted?

Did Saxon Kingdoms actually use the emblems we associate with them as flags or even on their shields (St Albans cross, Dragon of Wessex etc)? Pic kind related

General Saxon thread I guess

...

Are there not enough Bongs online atm to answer me?

Neat pic.

id wager they painted their shields with traditional designs like knotwork and things like that

Why is the saltire so aesthetic bros?

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

>Did they paint their shields?
Yes, they did this because a wooden shield is weaker on the grain of the wood. The paint obscures the way the shield-wood looks so an enemy with a sword or ax won't know where the weak point of your shield is.
>designs
Yes, same reason, but then symbols were more obscuring and looked nicer than just dying the shield red with white stripes.
>uniforms
Mail was uniform, usually accompanied by leather of gambeson. But if you mean did they have standardized equipment, they hate an armor criteria, but they weren't mass producing a specific type of armor just for the housemen. So no, but incidentally they all wore the same armor because that armor was THE armor.
>Emblems
Sure, why not?
I don't know. Banners don't survive all that well, but I would think the association and the few records we have would be proof enough to support a type of standard standard unique to each kingdom.

...

...

>*had an armor criteria
>*leather or gambeson

>tfw no qt saxon warrior gf

Did Saxon women usually fight??

Specifically were house hold guards known to use the coat of arms of their patron/lord or was that a late-medieval thing?

of coarse not, men are biologically speaking more expendable, one guy can make a hundred kids with a hundred available women, one women can make one child with a hundred available men.