>In WWI chemical weapons were dispersed alongside wide flat countryside against soldiers using gas masks And there's a reason they didn't use them in World War II
You see, non autistic people don't want to make 2 million people choke to death over 30 minutes.
Wyatt Morales
You know the Japs had gas masks right?
Samuel Jones
>How useful would had been massive air raids involving chemical weapons? And then Japan and Germany would have counterattacked with their own biological and chemical weapons and you would have a massive clusterfuck.
Jace Bailey
vx and nervous gases didnt exist in WWII (only in germany stockpiles)
Jack Martin
There was a basically unspoken rule not to use chemical weapons. Most military men, from all sides, believed their effectiveness was pretty limited to begin with.
Julian Bell
Mustard gas kills people, but does nothing to infrastructure. You can win a battle with it, but not war, unless you kill nearly every single last person in a sizable nation, which would require more mustard gas than the world has ever produced, many times over. Fire bombing, on the other hand, kills people and infrastructure, and fire, unlike gas, perpetuates itself, particularly in a mostly wooden city.
It also isn't as effective as yer thinking, lots of people survive gas attacks. It's really not useful for eliminating production centers, so much as clearing individual battlefields of infantry and generating fear.
Ethan Lee
>You see, non autistic people don't want to make 2 million people choke to death over 30 minutes.
ehh.. Did you forgot against whom was WW2 waged? The problem here was that the weapons were not efficient enough for tactical use and had Germans used them strategically, well judge for yourself.
And dioxine was accidently used in 'Nam. People there are still suffering from it.
Sebastian Campbell
...
Thomas Barnes
The kill rate for mustard gas is closer to 20% and only for those directly exposed. Even sarin gas, dropped in a city, has little effect - and we have historical examples of that. Scares the shit out of everyone, but that's about it.
Explosive bombs, on the other hand, start fires, that spread on their own. Not only having a much better kill ratio at the point of impact, but destroying builds, factories, warehouses, supplies, and spreading fires throughout which go on to do more of the same.
Now, if your goal is to take a city intact, a whole lotta gas bombs might be a viable strategy, but if your goal is to cripple the enemy's ability to make war, then you wanna use more traditional bombs.
Jordan Howard
>Did you forgot against whom was WW2 waged Lets put up the factions will we
Germans who had an army that were lead by non insane people who refused to use gas in all but one instance in fear of retaliation.
British who had an army that were lead by non insane people who refused to use gas in fear of retaliation despite Churchill urging them to.
Japanese who had an army that were lead by insane people who refused to use gas on anyone with their own stockpiles in fear of retaliation.
Italy, it's fucking Italy they couldn't win a war if you gave them nukes and told them to invade the north pole. Also they only gassed people who didn't have their own stockpile in fear of retaliation.
Soviet union, like they could produce anything more advanced than methane at that point
Jackson Barnes
>British who had an army that were lead by non insane people who refused to use gas in fear of retaliation despite Churchill urging them to. The anthrax bombs weren't much of a problem to them though. Thank god the war was over before they were ready.
Jack Rivera
Well, that, and if the city is expecting gas bombs, they are much easier to protect from than explosives.
Camden Edwards
The Japanese did use gas weapons a couple of times in China.
Juan Russell
That's what I said, they used them on people who couldn't retaliate in kind.
Michael Hughes
>Germans who had an army that were lead by non insane people who refused to use gas in all but one instance in fear of retaliation. I was refering to the gas chambers, but whatever. Point is that tactical use was not very viable (as shown in Kerch) and strategic use be like pissing on the hornets nest.
>Soviet union, like they could produce anything more advanced than methane at that point You underestimate Russian foolhardiness. Had Stalin said use chemical weapons, they would made the front uninhabitable for decades.
Hudson Morris
>Had Stalin said use chemical weapons They would have responded >We don't have any chemical weapons
doesn't change fact, they did not have them, couldn't make them and if they could, they couldn't store them.
John Walker
You seem rather conscious about that, it would be a shame if a post directly above yours had proven you wrong...
Carter Long
NTG, but the link makes it sound as though they didn't have any real stockpiles during WWII, and good deal of the stockpiles they had afterwards, were actually from Germany.
Any stockpiles they did have were likely destroyed during the initial German advance, that really forced Stalin to move and rebuild all his military production at the edge of Siberia. (Which was a rather staggering feet). Since he wanted to retake his country, using any gasses with long standing after effects or defoliage wouldn't have been a wise move. Once he was on the offensive, there would have been no need and he would have had to start thinking about the consequences to his position after the war - there being a lot of evidence that he was planning for that rather thoroughly.
Given the desperation and the cut-and-burn strategy, I am a bit surprised that no gas attacks were used by the Russians during that war, but it seems it maybe it was a combination of minimal availability and cooler heads prevailing. (Inasmuch as you can call Stalin a "cool head".)
Jose Garcia
less effective
with the bonus of maybe not destroying what you want to conquer.
chemical weapons are not strategic weapons. they only really work on the small scale to kill people otherwise protected from bullets or explosions.
even a biological weapon attack would only strain medical care systems.
Logan Flores
Would have been better of sticking with the "Bat Bomb" concept they had been legit working on. Less international heat later on, no nuke.
Jesus fuck our grampa's were crazy mother fuckers.
Owen Bennett
probably overall less effective than fire and completely useless against infrastructure
Bentley Jackson
They were ready in 1942...
Cameron Cruz
I was under the impression that weaponized Gas isn't a very effective strategic tool which is why, along with wanting to avoid the hassle of a retaliatory use of gas, all sides on WW2 never resorted to deploying it even in their most dire straits. Compared to say...biological weapons who held much more strategic promise and were fully contemplated and almost deployed by at least the British & Japanese.
Ethan Torres
Sarin gas would fuck millions six ways to Sunday in a largely populated city
Xavier Baker
No
Gavin Hernandez
Why not?
Elijah Ramirez
Cuz it's been done, twice, and it didn't. Killed less than a dozen people.
Christopher Peterson
I'm a scary gargoyle on a tower That you made with plastic power Your rhinestone eyes are like factories far away
When the paralytic dreams that we all seem to keep Drive on engines 'til they weep With future pixels in factories far away
So call the mainland from the beach Your heart is now washed up in bleach The waves are rising for this time of year And nobody knows what to do with the heat Under sunshine pylons we'll meet while rain is falling like rhinestones from the sky
I got a feeling now my heart is frozen All the phoses and the growsin Happy and after native in my soul I prayed on the unmovable Yeah clinging to the Adam's of rock Seasons seas just smooth signs of change I can't see now she so sexy Now that light is so I can see The storm bring strange loyalties and skies
Jason Stewart
More like 500, plus ~3,500 sickened, but yeah, not super-effective. (Then again, looking it over, you might right about the initial effect, seems much of this was incidental.)
Levi Miller
Wow, that's some real faggot shit.
Tyler Reed
It's Gorillaz' Rhinestone Eyes you plebei, shut the fuck up.
Josiah Miller
Some kind of nature Some kind of soul Some kind of mixture Some kind of goal Some kind of majesty Some chemical load
Some kind of metal made up from glue Some kind of plastic I could wrap around you
The needy eat man-mades They wear phony clothes They sit with our picture up until they grow old
Jackson Russell
babbies first alt-rock band
Gavin Myers
The myriad choices of his fate Set themselves out upon a plate For him to choose What had he to lose
Not a ghost bloodied country All covered with sleep Where the black angel did weep Not an old city street in the east Gone to choose
And wandering's brother Walked on through the night With his hair in his face On a long splintered cut from the knife of g.t.
The rally man's patter ran on through the dawn Until we said so long To his skull-shrill yell
Shining brightly red-rimmed and Red-lined with the time Infused with the choice of the mind On ice skates scraping chunks From the bells
Cut mouth bleeding razor's Forgetting the pain Antiseptic remains cool goodbye So you fly To the cozy brown snow of the east Gone to choose, choose again
Sacrificials remains make it hard to forget Where you come from The stools of your eyes Serve to realize fame, choose again
And roverman's refrain of the sacrilege recluse For the loss of a horse Went the bowels and a tail of a rat Come again, choose to go
And if epiphany's terror reduced you to shame Have your head bobbed and weaved Choose a side to be on
If the stone glances off Split didactics in two Leave the colors of the mouse trails Don't scream, try between If you choose, if you choose, try to lose For the loss of remain come and start
Start the game i che che che che i Che che ka tak koh Choose to choose Choose to choose, choose to go