It's got a really solid dev team! >a bunch of college-dropout babby web ""devs""
Read the whitepaper! >a hastily written, non-peer reviewed clusterfuck of buzzwords and shoddy, bombastic arguments
It's a long term hold! >ah yes, like the other hundreds of coins that ended up being "long term holds"
The only thing keeping the price down is a whale/bot! >it's just that everyone is trying to sell off their remaining shitcoins
The lead dev did X for Y! >some literal who lacking any significant education or impact did something vaguely related to X while being employed in some way that is distantly related to Y, which in any case does not translate in any way to cryptocurrency
Have I missed anything?
Jace Bailey
Examples of this:
DigiByte Ark Mooncoin BNT FirstBlood BitBeans
etc
Samuel Stewart
Don't forget my favorite
"It's got solid fundamentals" >I have no understanding of the technology behnd this so I'l say something vague and general so I don't look like a retard
Jacob Reyes
I'd add STRAT the original niggercoin
Jeremiah Murphy
This is why I invest in BitBay.
Jacob White
Official list of non shitcoins:
1. Bitcoin 2. Ethereum 3. Zcash - actual private transactions innovated by a collaboration of top recognized researchers in the field with an underlying theoretical underpinning, instead of "lol just mix it enough times and people will be too lazy to trace it back"
What am I missing here? Has to have a short explanation.
Lucas Bennett
Ark is not in this cathegory Main dev is a rocket enginner who worked FOR ESA, previously worked on LSK and has a 20 years experience in programming Not investing in it is just dumb get in while its still under 1 dollar
Oliver Ramirez
Let him do his own research. It's his loss.
Lincoln Miller
>But if it only takes x% of $huge_market!
Juan Mitchell
>ARK >building bridges for all blockchains is a bad thing
By OP's points every single fucking coin beyond bitcoin will suck ass
