Let's have a philosophy and humanities brainlet thread and laugh at retards

Back to /r/eddit, you don't even know how to greentext.

you're the plebbitor. > implying was the original greentext.

Whatever you say redditor

>he thinks post-modernism only works against conservativism

>he's a Marxist
>he believes class conflict isn't a social construct created to divide white people
>he believes race is only "skin deep"

>peoples ain't real
>loyalty ain't real
>"artificial scarcity"
>smash capitalism
>God ain't real
Was OP euphoric?

Nationalism is good, race is real, melanin makes people stupid and violent and capitalism is efficient and good.

The choice of the 21st century is simple. You either believe in the "spooks" of nationalism and race realism, or you have your country flooded by Sub-Saharan Africans.

>You either believe in the "spooks" of nationalism and race realism, or you have your country flooded by Sub-Saharan Africans.
Why?

Step out of your 99% white suburb and you'll quickly find out.

The Africans will come and submerge if they are not explicitly, physically stopped.
So if it doesn't happen, that means there has been real resistance against their coming. I assume user was saying that real resistance to it would only come with believing in racial nationalism. So his proposition "You either believe in the "spooks" of nationalism and race realism, or you have your country flooded by Sub-Saharan Africans" is right.

>Step out of your 99% white suburb
I don't know why /pol/ is so hung up on this meme, but when I did this I became a lot more liberal. Lily-white, affluent suburbs are full of racist edgelords just FYI.

What you are saying is completely irrelevant to user's post. Besides virtue signalling is useless here.
But since you live in a largely non white area, you should known very well that if you don't distinguish between people, you will be submerged by third world migrants over time. I'm sure you think this is a great thing, but that wasn't ever in question.

I would like to know the origin of that meme, and why it gets repeated as fact so often.

>

I don't know about America and don't even want to speculate. I've lived in various places where this was true though. In particular I can vouch for France and Brazil, where the every single obnoxious professional anti-racist (like, that makes their main profession out of it) live in comparatively sheltered and often full white areas.
Note that your "Lily-white, affluent suburbs are full of racist edgelords just FYI" is irrelevant here.

Look up limousine liberals you troglodyte.

Because the population of Africa is booming and they will all migrate to North America, Western Europe and Australia if these regions don't develop an ideology to justify stopping them.

The only ideology that could justify that is nationalism and racism. Without that, the entire population of Europe will be black by the end of this century.

And your "every single obnoxious professional anti-racist (like, that makes their main profession out of it) live in comparatively sheltered and often full white areas" is irrelevant here. I also have virtually no idea why you assume I think importing a bunch of third-world migrants is a good thing.

Furthermore, the non-whites I'm surrounded by are Hispanic (Catholics who speak a European language) and black people (who had their ethnogenesis in this country 400 years ago).

In the case of France, niggerization would be an improvement.

>He thinks capitalism is human nature and that everyone is greedy and selfish and not because of artificial scarcity
No amount of material wealth will ever sate human desire.

Those gurus who meditate on top of mountains and subsist on a handful of rice a day are in fact the greediest people in the world. If they used their razor sharp clarity to make it big on the stock market they would make millions, in terms of opportunity cost they are literally spending millions just so they can leisurely sit cross legged all day doing nothing.

>he is this deep in the capitalist trash bin

The population decline of what you consider the “master race” (whites + Japan, “whites of Asia”) is a phenomenon no one seems able to explain. And yet it's not such a complex matter if you have even a modicum of understanding of what life is all about.

Reproduction, like all life, is all about sacrifice. If we take the parents as isolated individuals, they stand to gain nothing from the creation and rearing of children. The benefits they would receive in old age via means of their children's caretaking are nothing compared to the insane costs they'd have to incur to raise them in the first place, so the transaction is a net expenditure on their part, and by a vast margin.

Now, the hyperculture of the master race has created a consciousness of how important the rearing process is, and how costly if it is to be done right, so even when members of the master race reproduce, they only create one or two descendants, as opposed to the constant mindless shitting out of fetuses that they used to indulge in when they were uncivilized, or indeed that the other races still continue to this day. So that is one important factor for the master race's population decline. In simple terms, the “master race” is going for quality over quantity, and that's a major part of what's causing the decline.

Simultaneously, the decline of religion, nationalism, blood ties, and institution of marriage have created the Individual — unknown to lower cultures or earlier phases of the “master race” culture — who is, like all advances, something of a double-edged sword, which many use to advance and improve their lives, but which others flail about and cut themselves with.

So on the one hand the individual no longer feels a responsibility towards his gods, nation, tribe or family to reproduce, because these are outdated, marginalized institutions — and JUSTLY marginalized (since their era has passed precisely because the culture has advanced beyond them) — that no longer hold any authority over anyone but a minority of backwards losers, but on the other hand, the philosophy that is destined to replace them — that of the Overman and the Eternal Recurrence — has not yet had sufficient time to take hold and lend reproduction a new meaning — a stronger and more glorious meaning than it has ever had! — and as a consequence the meaning of reproduction in the general culture is currently lacking to such a degree that — for the first time in history — a growing number of degenerates are even campaigning for its destruction (anti-natalism).

As a result of all this the majority of the population seems to have turned over completely to hedonism, and the last thing on their minds is to undertake the laborious task of propagating themselves — which is of course a good thing, because in this way the hedonists are removing their failed genes and gene configurations from our gene pool, and cleansing it of their wretched, repulsive stink.

>heredity is a social construct
>chimps are not greedy and selfish

cool logic sternertard

Meanwhile, all these developments — including the inherent weakness of civilized races by virtue of their very civilization — are being taken advantage of by the other races to invade the lands of the “master race”, and to breed themselves into its population and supplant it.

If they end up learning from our high culture, as opposed to simply running roughshod over it and destroying it, this is all well and good, and they'll deserve to succeed us as our genuine students and continuators — as our children, essentially: our cultural descendants — but what will happen in all likelihood is that, as at least some of them become more and more civilized (and, incidentally, end up clashing with those members of their own races which can't and therefore do not want to...), their numbers too will eventually decline, and then we'll be on a more equal footing, which by that time will have become a matter of indifference anyway since genetic engineering and boutique, designer babies will have completely abolished the usefulness of the concept of race. It's already useless for all but the crudest calculations, but only philosophers can see this right now (i.e. only I can): everyone else is either completely fixated on it (the conservatives) or denies that it has ever been useful or even real (the liberals).

But conservatives and liberals too are on their way to becoming extinct in short order, and be completely supplanted by the three categories of lifeforms whose struggle will decide mankind's future (at least until extraterrestrials arrive on the scene): the subhumans, the humans and... the superhumans, the last of whom I and a handful of other individuals throughout history, of course, have been the first examples.

>He has no arguments against anything so he just calls them a 'spook'
Most brainlet """ideology""" ever

>he doesn't believe in Zeus

>He doesn't believe in Ra

>blocks the path of everyone in this thread

The nation is the lubricant of the economy and is self-interested because it results in a stable state to maximize pleasure within.

>mfw OP brings out these spooked posters
I am not even surprised they are this triggered

pic related

>not praising Amun-Ra
Easily the best fusion in the canon

>No proof for not-X means X is proven
AHAHAHAHAHA

>all these spooked /pol/ faggots

Most 1st world countries already have heavy limits on immigration. Do you seriously think that they just let everyone in? The only way to get in ez is to be a refugee of some shitty war-town country.

>) is a phenomenon no one seems able to explain.
It's easily explained and not the first time in history it happened.

>Most 1st world countries already have heavy limits on immigration.
Not they don't. Zero percent is heavy.

>It's an "Atheists get BTFO" episode

>The Existential Problem & Religious Solution
youtube.com/watch?v=iw36V_iXR2k
youtube.com/watch?v=jkh2TXCHpNs

>The Laws of Nature
youtube.com/watch?v=_20yiBQAIlk

>Mere Christianity
youtube.com/watch?v=l_VYCqCexow

>The Origin (or 1,2,3,4)
youtube.com/watch?v=tw9biRRv_bM

>‘Right & Wrong’ – A Clue to the Meaning of the Universe
youtube.com/watch?v=QmHXYhpEDfM

>The Reality of the Moral Law
youtube.com/watch?v=LqsAzlFS91A

>What Lies Behind the Moral Law
youtube.com/watch?v=kcRFYGr1zcg

>The Poison of Subjectivism
youtube.com/watch?v=Lgcd6jvsCFs

>The Rival Conceptions of God
youtube.com/watch?v=yaGwF7A79_w

>The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment
youtube.com/watch?v=ZxwnHVr192A

>Why I Am Not a Pacifist
youtube.com/watch?v=k2xY2k26HFo
youtube.com/watch?v=jreq3mVvDgc

>Bulverism (Foundation of 20th Century Thought)
youtube.com/watch?v=DH53uFBOGbw

>The Necessity of Chivalry
youtube.com/watch?v=GBT9LasyC3E

>The Three Parts of Morality
youtube.com/watch?v=MtTeCyrgjIQ

>Sexual Morality
youtube.com/watch?v=-RkZXZx6HCI

Oh, so you're the "I don't want any brown people in my country" type. Well, it's not ever gonna happen.

>responding with more spooks
>thinking Strinerfags are atheists
How new are you?

>stirnerites
>marxists
gtfo brainlet

OH YEAH

B to THE FUCK OUT

AUTISM POWERRRRRRRRRRR

afirca birth rates are high, but dropping though

can i have some sources

>>He believes race isn't a social construct

What normal person with an intact pair of eyes and a functional brain does not believe this?

Like i can't even imagine the level of denial and mental gymnastics that someone has to employ in order to seriously believe that something like race is a "social construct".

>artificial scarcity

>evidence is good
>lawwwwjik is good
haha good one, brainlet

Enjoying that dogmatic ideology?

Thanks for posting this user.

The ever-shifting boundaries of white should show you that.

>"intellectual property"

What do artificial and modern nationalist conceptions have to do with African population growth?

That's a lie literally created by a marxist communist jew professor who wants all white men to be executed in concentration camps

Look up noel ignatiev

>he isn't muslim

>he thinks politics is philosophy and humanities
>spook poster

But you can think rationally without being "encouraged" by a spooky religion.

>In early 1992, Ignatiev objected to the University's purchase of a toaster oven for the Dunster House dining hall that would be designated for kosher use only. He insisted that cooking utensils with restricted use should be paid for by private funds
>In the article, Ignatiev described Israel as a "racial state, where rights are assigned on the basis of ascribed descent or the approval of the superior race" and likened it to Nazi Germany and the Southern United States before the civil rights movement.
Seems like a chill guy

>internalist
>isn't a philosopher of science
>isn't a scientist

> He thinks calling something a social construct invalidates it completely.
Why are people this retarded?

Noel Ignatiev is fine and doesn't want to oppress anybody. You're functionally retarded.

Ignorance breeds conservatism

Explain.

Says the one who supports the antisemitic marxist

>tfw Civic Nationalist
>tfw when I believe some socialist policy would be good
>tfw if I even say I am a Civic Nationalist you all will just lump me in with /pol/ because of the word Nationalist.

That's because nationalism is the same as being a cuckold

Yeah fuck Drumpf and fuck borders!

>I'm a living parody: The post.

Rationality isn't a good thing.

Antizionism isn't anti-Semitic, it's the only ethical option

>Antizionism isn't anti-Semitic
Not always, but pretty frequently

Rationality is a slave to the ego.

>gets btfo
>'ur d-dum lol'

>evidence
spook

t. Jewish republican

The oppression of Palestinians is unacceptable and should be opposed by all morally conscious people.

>philosophy thread turns into half race posting and half spook posting
Why do I even bother

>He's a moral nihilist/moral relativist/anything but moral realist
>He believes in the tabula rasa view of human psychology
>He thinks the fact that organizing differences in different sets is something done socially means the differences don't exist

>stirner
sup brainlet

>he thinks about god in terms of good and evil
>he thinks about god in terms of science and logic

*sips tea*
*farts*

OP is a dumb stirnerposter and started with the premise "race is a social construct". I don't understand why are you surprised.

dag nabbit, whitey dun got me stumped with another one-uh them source-less graphs

> sourceless
Any population graph will tell you that story. His source is likely the UN.
esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf

Here, I forgot the graph.

Calling it a construct means doing anything just coz of it or paying any price for it is stupid

I don't get the spook meme

>VIRTUE SIGNALLING
Already the meme of the year.

The second to last is Plotinus I think. who's the last guy? that's not thomie or augustine is it?

>Civic Nationalism meme
Race == Nation
When the founding race of a nation is gone or marginalized, the nation that they built is gone. The buildings and monuments might still be there, but the essence is gone

>ez is to be a refugee
And as you should know, unless you live under a rock, becoming a """refugee""" is extremely easy if you are dark, thus bypassing the immigration slog. Even easier if you claim to be a """""child"""""

>==
What did he mean by this

>DUDE EVERYTHINGS A SPOOK INCLUDING MORALITY!

>ALSO, YOU ARE MORALLY A BAD PERSON IF YOU DONT AGREE WITH MY COOKIE CUTTER LEFTIST DOGMA!

Name anyone more autistic than Stirner posters