*defeats you*

*defeats you*

>US gets tired after killing millions of yellow gooks with negligible casualties
>"lol we win fak u roundeye"

Go to bed, Tojo.

>it's another "Americans try to validate their lack of strategic success with k/d ratios" episode

Shut up, Ho. Go eat some flied lice with your disgusting raw fish while I eat a juicy hamburger with the freshest ingredients. No wonder Asians are so unhealthy, you're so lazy you can't even cook fish.

>the american rabidly thrashes about to try and stifle his humiliation, the myth of his military infallibility challenged

By this logic Hitler won WW2

*wins war*

>German standard of living in 2017 is superior to that of Russian standard of living in 2017
>therefore Germany didn't actually lose to the soviets in 1945

*blocks your path*

Russia has absolutely nothing to do with the Soviet Union dude.

*blocks both of your paths and gets cucked 20 years later*

*cucks Australia, Japan, Korea and China*

*every single time*

>a regime change means it has "nothing to do" with its historical precedents

AMERIKEKS ON FULL DAMAGE CONTROL

You'd have to make it all the former soviet countries standards to have a real comparison.

It'd still be valid, and in either case the point was obviously that "modern standards of living are a garbage argument for whether you won or lost a war".

Did you include the living standards of the territories the Germans lost, just to be sure.

user are you deliberately letting the point of the statement fly over your head in order to win an irrelevant pedantic discussion?

I'm just messing with you.

Did they really win? Their objective was to secure all of the Korean peninsula right? They were on their way to doing that until the US arrived and after a lot of back and forth signed off on the 48th parallel peace treaty

The Germans hardly suffered negligible casualties. Plus their whole country was bombed into the ground.