Refute this, you misanthropic, nihilistic, brainlets

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/hdLzAglMSB0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

...

I haven't been a misanthrope since I learned systems and am a biological pantheist.
Oh boy I must be a genius better tweet about this to my tweeps
.
The idea that I should be happy is just absurd. Yeah I try all that detachment bullshit and it works as an idea but not in practice.
It's like having AIDS, even if you come to terms with it, and enjoy what you have left, you still have AIDS.
Happiness is usually dishonest.

I can't, it's undeniably the truth.

That being said I'm either a genius or a retard in that case.

You're still not there yet. Every single action of yours must be imbued with meaning, with passion, with justice, with energy.

youtu.be/hdLzAglMSB0

Only when I'm drooling and happy crying about sad things because I took 20gs of oyster mushrooms and watched Shrek for the 7th time in 1 day.
But it's fleeting. The layers grow back

Layers of Shrek?

Shrek is love
Shrek is life
Shrek is like an onion
Don't you see? The truth is grander than any of the false gods promise.
LIFE IS SHREK

Shrek is love
Shrek is life
Shrek is like an onion
Don't you see? The truth is grander than any of the false gods promise.
LIFE IS SHREK
YOU GET IT?
THEY BOTH HAVE LAYERS

Shrek is all living systems viewed as layers in a panarchy
Connected to eachother, they seem to be separated by thin membranes but in reality they all grow from the same seed and constitute 1 being.
SHREK, THE NEW VITALISM

Well fuck, this thread is rendered obsolete. I have seen The Shrek.

>nihilistic, brainlets
Commas don't go here.
Not a nihilist tho.

can't
me on the left desu

>Commas don't go here.

Commas can go where you want them to go. They're stylistic, not grammatical.

t. not a brainlet, unlike you

I'm on my phone can someone post a shrek pic for me?

thank mr banky

This place is actually fucking Reddit.

what the fuck is that jung quote doing there?

it's actually
>>>/leftypol/
PLUS
>>>/reddit/
this board is constantly being shilled on, don't ask me why, i guess commies hate the truth and different opinions, literally bigots

>Refute this
Panel 1 is too ambiguous a representation of sufficient knowledge for the emotion depicted, while panel 5 is not. In fact, I would claim that it is the complete opposite to panel 1, insofar that it is completely explicit in the depiction of knowledge required for the emotional state shown.