Asiatic peoples

Why India? Doesn't make sense. India is the homeland of Veddoids not Mongoloids.

Obviously they are ayylmao's with no soul

my god that was retarding to read

the wind gave them flat faces?!

>their faces are so flat
wat

No on the edge of India user, notice how west India has alot of mongoloids native to it.
No the cold temperature did.

Vedic people were Indo-European Aryans

Dravidian abbos are natives of South and Southeast Asia. They later got cucked by Aryans to the West and mongs to the north

Veddoid doesn't mean Vedic, idiot

Veddoid is a term to describe the pure unadultered aboriginals of South Asia, nothing to do with Vedic Aryans from Europe.

Dravidians are mixed with Neolithic farmers from Iran.

mongoloids descended from australoids
australoids being the bedrock/foundation of mongoloid/caucasoid race

mongoloids didnt evolve more, the australoids mixed with peking man type hominids and became mongoloids

it proves regional continuity of peking man to modern china

750,000 years ago Peking Man with Mongoloid features

"On the Relevance of the Regional Continuity Features of the Face in East Asia" also found that a form of facial flatness is unique to China (i.e. only appears there at high frequency, very rarely elsewhere)

Shovel-shaped incisors are commonly cited as evidence for regional continuity in China.

"It is the pattern of shoveling that identities as an East Asian regional feature, not just the occurrence of shoveling of any sort

a non-depressed nasal root, non-projecting perpendicularly oriented nasal bones and facial flatness are unique to the Chinese region in the fossil record and may be evidence for limited regional continuity

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans#China

Multiregionalism doesn't work.
East Asians have a very small bit of Denisovan admixture, which is of course present in Europeans as well but in a vanishing fraction.
East Asians and Europeans are both a mixture of OoA humans and Neanderthals.

fucking wat

ok lets think through what the hell you're on about.
You are saying that because it sucks up there and you have to squint all the time, being born scrunching up your face and squinting your eyes permanently is a genetic trait that will get you to thrive more and mate more.
SO MUCH SO that we now have asia as it is.

if that's the case, you're a fucking idjut

>mixture of OoA humans and Neanderthals.
just a few years ago and academia considered neanderthal mixing with humans to be fringe psuedoscientific crap

mongoloids exhibit regional features of peking man and inhabit the land of peking man

caucasoids phenotype can be easily traced to their australoid forebearers (who once occupied terrirories throughout eurasia and even americas),

but mongoloids have a distinct peking man phenotype that is not can not be traced to australoid

>just a few years ago

They had a relatively valid reason at the time to think so since Humans don't carry even a single Neanderthal derived uniparental DNA lineage.

Autosomal DNA studies however have confirmed the Neanderthal admixture event beyond all doubt.

If East Asians had non-Neanderthal archaic ancestry beyond ~0.1-0.2% Denisovan it would be easy to notice as autosomal DNA can be deciphered with the current level of science.

and just a decade ago it was thought to be impossible by the scientific authorities

heard of floresiensis?
heard of boskop?

there are literally 100s of yet undiscovered species and subspecies of hominids

most wont get discovered even

to discount the real possibility that mongoloid alien phenotype is a result of mixture with undiscovered hominids is anti-scientific

Doesn't matter. East Asians don't have special archaic ancestry or else it would show up in *-stat matrixes.

You don't understand anything about the science involved and yet you claim that scientists are anti-scientific.

>10 years ago: East Asians don't have special archaic ancestry, its scientifically proven to be impossible, everyone just shut the fuck up and listen to my superior opinions
>in 2010: oh shit, we found a previously unknown hominid Denisova
>shit, looks like mongoloids have special archaic ancestry
>2017: but now i am TOTALLY sure that East Asians don't have special archaic ancestry, just trust me on this one

hear it from an actual asian, the poster is stupid to assume that all Asians have the same characteristic,
to say that I have a slant eyes is preposterous.
it's like saying all apples are red, when in fact some can be green,

East Asians don't have enough Denisovan admixture for it to be significant and Denisovan alleles aren't entirely absent from Europe.

The ones with meaningful Denisovan admixture are Papuans and Australians. They are 5-7% Denisovan.

>t. ainu
you are special apple, research your aboriginal past

2/2

you people need some education, it's making you ridiculous here on the net. if you just listen to your history class then you would not be dumb enough to make such stupendous assumptions on something you don't know, u dumb americans,

don't make china as the whole ASIAN
you americans, china is a fake country, literally fake shit comes out of there, those savages eat dogs and cats and shits sheesh,

>American education in a mainland chinese inmigrant: the post

Chinese and Japanese have no Australoid admixture. I don't think Polynesians do either. Proto-mongoloids are distinct from Australoids.

australoid haplogroup M are observed in Asia, specifically in Bangladesh, China, India, Japan, Nepal, and Tibet

Haplogroup M2 [2] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M3 [3] - found mainly in South Asia
Haplogroup M29'Q found among Papuans, Australian Aborigines
Haplogroup M31 [24] - found among the Onge, in the Andaman Islands[15]
Haplogroup M32 [25] - found in Andaman Islands
Haplogroup M33 [26] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M33a - found in India
Haplogroup M34 [27] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M40 [30] - found in South Asia[15]
Haplogroup M41 - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M42 [31] - found among Australian Aborigines
Haplogroup M5 [5] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M6 [6] - found mainly in South Asia

Haplogroup M contains much more derived lineages than those rare ones which don't have their own letters.

>C
>Z
>D
>G

All typical and characteristic of Mongoloid populations, particularly from NE and East Asia.

So much for you wacky theory that M is Australoid.
Besides, Aurignacian Europeans had M. They just went extinct.

>haplogroup M
you just confirmed that mongoloids derived from australoids

Never argued otherwise.
Europeans also descend from Australoid looking Eurasians.
Kostenki man had physical similarities to Australoids and yet genetically he is the earliest European ancestor that has been identified.

Only the Jomon are representative of a basal East Asian phenotype.

Polynesians are Austronesians with Papuan admixture,Amerindians have Ancient North Eurasian and Ainu have Paleosiberian.

Do you think this Papuan looks anything like the lady I posted? If Polynesians have any admixture from them it's very minimal.

Polynesians are primarily East Asian but their Papuan ancestry is far from insignificant.
nature.com/nature/journal/v538/n7626/full/nature19844.html#tables

The Jomon are the best representative of an unadmixed "Australoid" population with East Asian roots(as opposed to descent from Australasians and Andaman Islanders).

Looks like it's just a couple of Polynesians then, not all of them. Maori look close to Jomon/Ainu. They're just a bit darker due to the climate of where they live.

Are native americans mongoloid?

>Maori look close to Jomon/Ainu.
Shouldn't be a surprise,Austronesians are derived from neolithic cultures from coastal China(some of which are phenotypically Australoid).

What is more annoying is this individual trying to associate Australasians,South Asians and Andaman Islanders with East Asians because proto Mongoloids had an Australoid phenotype.

>eat dogs and cats
So do nords, what's your point

The northern ones are proto-mongoloids. You can see that they do have some Caucasian-like traits as the Jomon and Maori do as well. I'm not sure about whether the southern ones fall into though.

>Amerindians
They are admixed with Ancient North Eurasians(30-40%).

Ancient North Eurasians and other West Eurasians may have some basal East Asian ancestry. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/doi/10.1093/molbev/msw293/2838774/A-Working-Model-of-the-Deep-Relationships-of

You include the fucking aboriginal Americans? Why not include the fucking Indians then?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid#Proto-Mongoloids

>Lahr said that the other hypothesis is that Mongoloids originate from Southeast Asian populations that expanded from Africa to Southeast Asia during the first half of the Upper Pleistocene and then traveled to Australia-Melanesia and East Asia. Lahr said that the morphology of the Paleoindian is consistent with the proto-Mongoloid definition.

Native Americans share genes with Europeans, particularly the Aryans.
It's a folk legend of the uninformed that they are Mongoloids.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal'ta-Buret'_culture

yes

Ancient North Eurasians were not white.

>Wikipedia
No one knows when and where the Mongoloid phenotype emerged.

What doesn't change is that Amerindians are heavily admixed with Ancient North Eurasians.

There's a dearth of ancient East Asian DNA with isolated population such as the Taiwanese Austronesians(East Asian lowlanders),Sherpas(East Asian highlanders) and Ainu(Jomon) and Ulchi(East Asian's from Devil's Gate) providing clues to the internal split of East Asians.

Amerindians cluster closest with Siberians. They aren't anywhere near Europeans.

ANE are the source of at least some of the genes which White people carry so they are one of the founding fathers of White people.

ANE is pretty much chink admixture. Yamnaya were mixed with chinks. The "Europeans" closest to them today are the heavily mongoloid influenced Saami.

whites were founded by cro-magnons long before ANE

>I don't understand something thus I call it chink to discredit it

Doesn't matter since those guys sucked balls. Modern day White people carry the genes of ANE. Sardinians ain't white anyway.

>They aren't anywhere near Europeans.
Why would they be? Europeans only derive part of their ancestry from Ancient North Eurasians.

>ANE is pretty much chink admixture.
ANE is descended from the West Eurasian split of non Africans.

mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2017/01/09/molbev.msw293.short?rss=1

>hurr Siberian mongoloid admixture isn't chink

Let's try to imagine a population which contributed significant DNA to both to the Eurasian looking Kets and the hyper-Caucasoid looking Chechens.

Hmmm...

>no Siberian mongol genes here, pure Aryan master race

Not strictly connected to ANE idiot or else Scots would share alleles with Han Chinese wouldn't they?

The ANE natives of Siberia became intermixed with East Asians over time, beginning around 10000 years ago.

>Modern day White people carry the genes of ANE

a subset, ie russians and finns

also thats like saying
>Modern day Yellows people carry the genes of Australoid genes

>Irish
>Scots
>Spaniards
>Scandinavians
>Germans
>Slavs
>Finns

All ANE carriers. Mediterranean wogs also had more ANE in the classical times as their Indo-European blood wasn't as dilluted yet.

>all of them occasionally exhibit chink phenotypes, specially Russians and Finns

well that's why you look at subclades, the more a lineage spreads and mutates the less it is linked to a specific ethnicity
African R1b is a totally different branch from European R1b

you had almost fully WHG Latvians in the mesolithic carrying R1b so by that point one could say it was already pretty much west Eurasian

>Modern day Yellows people carry the genes of Australoid genes

R might have had some remote origin in paleolithic SE Asia but still EHG were just as "West Eurasian" as WHGs.

Besides, WHGs weren't the original Europeans anyway. They replaced the Aurignacian descendants.

Lochsbour had only 5% Aurignacian admixture IIRC.

WHG and ANE/EHG must be seen as something related to each other and equally unrelated East Asians, and almost equally unrelated to Aurignacians.

you have more viral ancestry than asians have denisovan ancestry

shut the fuck up retard

...

well, your theory is correct

can i get names for different branches of their race
like how caucasians have white, med, arab peoples

what does asian race have

>t. locust insectoid

4th from top looks latina, and qt af

>Med and Arab
>Distinct

Lmao

Asian here, not scientific, for most common social use divided around:
North east Asian: North China, Korea, Japan
South east Asian: South China, Vietnam, Thailand, etc.
North west Asian: Uighur, Kazakhstan, Kyrgistan, Stans etc.

Amerindians, Eskimos, and Pacific Islanders are included scinetifically

Traits don't have to kill you to die out. It could simply be that a certain trait is beneficial and allows those that have it to breed successfully

this
especially in humans

humans are too smart to really be pressured by the environment too hard and differences are mostly due to sexual selection, drift and bottlenecks

India didn't exist back then.

Also,
>Northwest India
What did he mean by this?

The only "Arabs" that look like Meds are the ones that live close to the Mediterranean sea unsurprisingly.

>4th from top looks latina
Well yeah, since she is from peru

I work here and some native Japanese especially in the labor force really look un-asian. Almost like Polynesian. But very rare lol

What's with the WE WUZ WHITE Japanese posters these days? Is this Japanese autism?