How could Hitler have won the war?

How could Hitler have won the war?

You said it yourself, mind control towers.

He would need to somehow re-arm from 35ish to 39 (or whenever he makes his move), without alarming the other Great Powers of the world such that he can parlay his initial successes into stable political gains instead of an all out war to the death.

How the hell he can do this, I have no idea, but ultimately, that's what he needs and doesn't have.

Not having useless

Having any useful allies at all

As a total aside, I read the stuff in the picture, and the "Educated" and "Expert" ideas are pretty retarded.

>rearm from 35 to 39

That's exactly what they did though, albeit in secrecy.

'Establish air supremacy over Britain' seems like a sound idea. They could have achieved this had Hitler not chimped out and demanded the Luftwaffe waste resource on terrorbombing civilians

I'm sorry, I wasn't clear.

The re-armament was done, but at a cost of burning up what little international political capital the German/Nazi state had. It meant that by the time open war broke out, Britain and France, and then later the Soviets and the Americans, were uninterested in any sort of victory other than complete occupation of Germany, obliteration of the government, and rebuilding the state from the ground up, possibly dismembering Germany itself.

Hitler does not have the material resources to win against nigh-unlimited commitment like that. He has some very temporary advantages, but ultimately he will lose those, and be crushed under the superior industry of his enemies, should the war go on indefinitely. He cannot realistically strike at the vitals of his enemies, so the war cannot but go on indefinitely until he loses. And he has no way of buying peace with his initial victories, precisely because that re-armament scared too many other people. He needs to re-arm without provoking that kind of international response.

>'Establish air supremacy over Britain' seems like a sound idea.

No, it's a completely impossible and retarded idea. Hell, he couldn't even establish air superiority, let alone supremacy.

>They could have achieved this had Hitler not chimped out and demanded the Luftwaffe waste resource on terrorbombing civilians

You're an idiot. The Me-109 doesn't even have the range to get to most of Britain and back; they had enough fuel problems just getting to London and back. That is of course ignoring the fact that in every month of the war before 1944, Britain built more fighters and trained more pilots than Germany did, and had significant advantages playing defense, like

>Not having to escort slow, almost helpless bombers
>Being able to recover their pilots.

He was losing the air war before he started terrorbombing, and was losing it afterwards, and even if he was "winning" it, and could drive the British out of southern England without them calling in the fighter groups assigned to guarding more northern areas, he doesn't have the ability to bomb England into submission, nor can he make it work tactically to support a sealion, what with his utter lack of transport and his nonexistant amphibious experience of his army. Worst comes to very worst, the RAF pulls back to bases in the midlands, waits for winter, and comes back in the spring with new and fresher fighters.

Saying he should have "Established air supremacy over England" is like saying "Well he should have just taken Moscow and Leningrad in '41". It's vague, stupid optimism and completely unbacked by reality.

Sophmoric