Why?
Why is cannibalism immoral?
Levi Collins
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Matthew Clark
nothing is moral or immoral, you faggot, it's just impractical and results in a net loss of calories for humanity as a whole
do you know how much energy it takes to even gestate a baby for 9 months? way less than you get from eating the baby, numbnuts
>waiting 9 months for a single meal
>this is what cannibals ACTUALLY believe
shit isn't sustainable
Asher Hughes
Either because:
A) It requires an act of killing, which is generally considered to be a Bad Thing, or at best a necessary evil. Murdering people so you can eat them is frowned upon for reasons that don't need explaining. Eating those you've killed in battle or as an execution is more complex, but it could be argued that this would lead to killing people for their meat which is a Bad Thing (just kill a cow you fuck).
B) Like many unhealthy things it's become a social taboo for valid reasons, just like fucking your sister or eating your own shit, which leads to being considered immoral. Cannibalism CAN be done in healthy and sustainable ways, but preparing the body would take skill, and the meat is more likely to contain dangerous diseases. Hepatitis is a five thousand year old disease, and eating a carrier who is not yet showing symptoms would not be the best idea. Better off eating a cow.
Michael Kelly
But what if there's no cows or you don't want to waste a milking cow when you already have someone that died from say an accident like falling of a roof.
Jaxon Sanders
it's energetically unsustainable
if you start eating other humans, they'll run out before more are born, because realistically, one adult human is about two (2) weeks worth of meat, and it takes 18 fucking years to grow
Lucas Lee
But if there already dead from a accident you might as well eat them if you get to save a cow for later.
Tyler Russell
Morality and Immorality isn't a universal concept, it only applies to certain groups of people at any given time.
Cannibalism also exists in the animal kingdom, more or less, so you can't say it is unnatural to us.
Therefore; survival of the fittest; Eat to your heart’s content.
Carson Butler
P R I O N S
R
I
O
N
S
Liam Garcia
Because it's evil.
Aiden Cruz
>Morality and Immorality isn't a universal concept
>nothing is moral or immoral
These.
Blake Thompson
it's also not really healthy to consume i guess
Brayden Hughes
>muh moral relativism
>dude there's nothing wrong with cannibalism
>its just society that decides, lmao we're animals! god doesn't exist. *tip*
>The Existential Problem & Religious Solution
Part 1 youtube.com
Part 2 youtube.com
>Man or Rabbit?
youtube.com
>The Laws of Nature
youtube.com
>Mere Christianity
youtube.com
>The Origin (or 1,2,3,4)
youtube.com
>‘Right & Wrong’ – A Clue to the Meaning of the Universe
youtube.com
>The Reality of the Moral Law
youtube.com
>What Lies Behind the Moral Law
youtube.com
>The Poison of Subjectivism
youtube.com
>The Rival Conceptions of God
youtube.com
>The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment
youtube.com
>Why I Am Not a Pacifist
Part 1 youtube.com
Part 2 youtube.com
>Bulverism (Foundation of 20th Century Thought)
youtube.com
>The Necessity of Chivalry
youtube.com
>The Three Parts of Morality
youtube.com
>Sexual Morality
Part 1 youtube.com
Part 2 youtube.com
Now kill yourself.
Landon Cox
>spamming
Xavier Myers
& humanities strikes again
Michael Sullivan
Because all meat eating is wrong.
Eli Brooks
>humans eat meat for over 200.000 years
>it suddenly becomes wrong
Owen Price
>200.000 years
That's weird, since the world is 6000 years old.
And eating meat was only allowed after the Flood.
Colton Campbell
That's still ~4000 years worth of meat eating.
Blake Peterson
So?
God's original creation did not include meat eating.
Asher Murphy
See point B. Eating people is dangerous because... Okay, you ever heard of the concept that animals have degrees of seperation from humans? Different animal species are further from human, and the further they are the harder it is for one of their diseases to infect us?
All humans have pretty much the same diseases available. A cow has a lot of minor things that won't fuck you up if you eat it, but anything a person has when you eat them you will almost certainly catch, especially if you don't cook them well.
This is of course vastly oversimplified, but it gets the point across.
Joshua Bennett
lel
>keep the carrot whole instead of slicing it, suddenly its better for your bones because it is shaped like one
Gabriel Harris
>that pic
wait holy shit I've heard about that concept in the study of esotericism
it's called, like, sympathetic magic or something
do you believe in it? can you elaborate?
John Barnes
the only reason you would think cannibalism isn't immoral is if you were presuming either utilitarianism or moral skepticism
if you were presuming moral skepticism in general there'd be no reason to ask this particular moral question
so you're presuming utilitarianism
and even then, under rule utilitarianism it's easy to say cannibalism is immoral
so you're presuming act utilitarianism
why would you be an act utilitarian?
Owen James
Sometimes it's not, for example some American tribes eat their dead ancestors.
Carson Mitchell
because it is such that we tend to disapprove of it
Carter Cruz
Several of the things on that list look radically different than their wild progenitors due to human selective breeding.
Jace Martinez
If he's already dead, then there's nothing immoral about it necessarily.
If you're the one killing him, that violates the non-aggression principle