What was his endgame?
It wasn't to liberate Rome's slaves.
It wasn't to invade Rome itself.
For some reason he wasn't trying to escape.
So what is it? He seems to be just raising shit for shit-raising's sake.
What was his endgame?
Kevin Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
Parker King
One could speculate that after he reached the alps and his troops requested to turn back that his ego took over and he imagined himself a general sacking the confederation. Sort of like how the Teutones did a few hundred years before
Jaxon Jones
Defeat Crassus so his army can also cross the Alps into Transalpine Gaul/Germania with the civilian slaves. However he wasn't confident he'd beat Crassus so mainly it was a holding action.
That's the show at least. The historical Spartacus was sending correspondence to Sertonius and Mithradates, so it's possible they were hoping for a three pronged attack against Rome, but it didn't work out.
Dominic Ross
He was barbarian scum, meaning that his only goal or purpose in life was to shed bled. However he did not know his place in the arena among many other 'people' and decided to shed the blood of innocent civilians. Fortunately Marcus Licinius Crassus out an end to his dastardly tirade.
Jayden Brooks
Did this really happen?
Parker Williams
>For some reason he wasn't trying to escape.
Pretty much every ancient source is sympathetic to Spartacus in that they agree that he personally wanted to fuck off back to Thrace.
It was the rest of the slaves that wanted to tear up shit, kill Romans and steal everything that wasn't nailed down. Releasing he was either with them or against them in their eyes, Spartacus had no choice but to lead the revolt till its inevitable defeat.
Did anyone else here have an irrational love for Crassus as a kid?
Lincoln Perry
>Did anyone else here have an irrational love for Crassus as a kid?
No, and you were a weird fucking child.
Aaron Long
He got in too deep and couldn't turn back. Even if he and his troops would have made it to safety, he would have died within a year. The reason for that is that his whole army consisted of former warriors from different cultures and places. That doesn't mix well. So if he would have sided with one party the other one would have killed him. After a while Rome would just conquer them again,
Elijah Peterson
The only time he tries to do something noble and "Roman" he loses everything for it.
He was as truly tragic figure, you'd be weird not to like him.
Levi Morgan
>The only time he tries to do something noble and "Roman" he loses everything for it.
>He was as truly tragic figure, you'd be weird not to like him.
Brah, he was a fucking real estate tycoon who beat up slaves. As soon as he fought an actual enemy he got destroyed by them when he outnumbered them four to one.
He's like Donald Trump of the common era.