From an objective stand point, how much of the blame does he actually deserve fro world war 2?

From an objective stand point, how much of the blame does he actually deserve fro world war 2?

Most of it.

I would say most of the blame should go to Wehrmacht officers who initially HATED Hitler.

A political figure is merely a pawn used by the masses to use for either hate or love, sometimes both. In the few cases a leader does have power, it's usually considered a tyrannical who goes against the wishes of his people.

Quite contradictory to the media bias against the Nazis, Hitler was not a tyrant. He was a smart political figure who held more power than most of his time, but he went with the wishes of the German people rather than against them.

However, an entire country being evil propaganda would obviously not go so well, so instead, the media of the time just demonized Hitler and the Nazis claiming they were dictators who got their power from force.

Almost all of it and what little doesn't rest on him rests on Tojo.

He's definitely responsible for it being as bad and as massive as it was, at least in Europe. Obviously he didn't start the war in Asia, and there were tensions in Europe before Hitler ever came to power. But it's a hypothetical how they would have panned out had Hitler never existed.

>He's definitely responsible for it being as bad and as massive as it was, at least in Europe
>Implying that doesn't fall on Britain and France for turning what would have been a war of Poland and Germany (maybe USSR too) into a global war

>A political figure is merely a pawn used by the masses to use for either hate or love, sometimes both.
This. The German people were to blame, they ought to have been gassed alongside the kikes. Also go back to fucking reddit.

None of it.

Most of the blame goes to the Arabs Hitler was in talks with before WW2. They were able to convince him to go after the Jews. Hitler was used by Arabs. WW2 was a proxy war fought by Arabs to eliminate the Jews for their benefit.

Practically all of it

You all retarded here.

Hitler wanted to exterminate the jews, he knew they are a virus that deserved being treated with fire, but at the same time, he did not want his people to carry such burden as to exterminate a race.
His plan was pretty simple. Take all jews, Haavara agreement, and put them among the Muslims. The jews have been fucking up the arabs since their shitty religion started, it wouldn't surprise anybody if the Muslims decided to behead all jews.
End result, all jews dead but no by the German hand.

The big problem was the jews managed to fuel the war before all were shipped away from Germany, giving them the Victim card for later generations.
Germany would have influenced Europe into taking the Red-pill and closing all help and communications with the jews in Israel, if they happen to suddenly control the Muslims, then some German gas would have been used, but that would have been plan B.

And back to OPs question.

He would have without doubt taken the guilt, voluntarily.
The jews only made him a Martyr by trying to demonize him.
Of course war happened and people died, if you are asking about death tolls, the thing still goes on his favor. What were Eisenhowers death camps, Stalin Gulags, etc.

Again, war happened and from there there will always be a loser. Blaming won't bring those lives back; learning the best course of history will possibly stop further wars to happen, but only if we learn, not blame.

ww2 wasn't about jews though, retart

Nah, it was the judeo-bolsheviks and the bankers fault

Very little.

He was the necessary evil.

WW1 was about destroying European monarchy.

WW2 was about destroying Europe.

Partial blame. Chamberlain wrote privately that Czeckoslokia only existed as a means of initiating war with Germany but the time wasn't right during the Munich episode. He probably felt the same about Poland.

The only reason the western powers would care about Germany wanting to incorporate Danzig was to keep Germany small. France because a powerful Germany was a direct threat to French hegemony and Britian because it had a 200+ year strategy of keeping a balance of power on the continent.

German attitudes were always in favor of reclaiming the corridor and if Hitler didnt' do it another politician would have.

About as much as Attila for Hunic conquests.

Why do my Hitler threads keep getting deleted?

>An Israeli said it so it must be true

>it's Britain and France's fault they did what they said they were going to do if Germany invaded Poland