WHAT
DID
HE
MEAN
BY
THIS
WHAT
Other urls found in this thread:
themerkle.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>make a shitty analogy by comparing your crypto to JP Morgan
>If we fuck you you can fork
well that's not reassuring at all.
Also
>implying ethereum isn't the one that split off
He means the difference is you actually have power over made up things. Like what is JP morgan? I company that makes tabacco? Is there tabacco got different chemicals in it then others what makes it JP MORGAN tabacco. What makes it classic. Is there nicotine my nicotiny or more carcinogenic. The answer is its all just tabacco, everything else is a state of mind (made up) you still can't make jp morgan classic. They would sue the shit out of you for something that essentially doesn't exist.
>Like what is JP morgan?
Uh JP Morgan is a banking company. Are you thinking of Philip Morris?
I honestly thought MP morgan was an american tabacco brand. lmao well oops holds true anyway change tabacco for currency.
Wow, he's losing it. Ethereum already made a rollback and a fork, and now he suggests a fork is an ok option after huge failure?
Sell your ETH people, Vitalik is going nuts.
Fuck this autist skeleton.
the pussy corrupted his IQ
Already have, the main thing going for crypto is zero trust and he fucked that completely.
Maybe. But the truth is that lastly his public statements have been pretty stupid (he doesn't give a fuck about Bitcoin? WTF ) and vague (suggesting that a fork is a good thing if the creators of a token are corrupt? ). He's behaving like a heavily medicated autist who's not allowed to have a rage attack because of the chemicals on his brain blocking his impulses. Also, the market seems to be downtrending, so he is certainly not adding value to the discussion about his own creation, he is just rambling randomly about shit he shouldn't be publicly discussing at all.