Tell me about the Aryans Veeky Forums

>How to spot a pajeet
Thankfully no one besides weird hindu nationalist buy into this crap.

Aryans were a minority but their culture and religion highly influenced the subcontinent, similar to turks invading anatolia in very miniscule numbers but locals adopting to turkic culture and the new religion they brought up.

Moreover they did not had "indian" religion. No one claims they imposed Ganesh on the poo in the loos. The Aryan religino was highly based on proto indo european religion but it was changing constantly. It changed even before they migrated to india proper, with being in contact with the indus valley civilization, after they migrated to india they also adopted a lot of the local religion themselves.

Indians have an inferiority compelx coming from british conquest so they rage at the implification of blue eyed men conquering them a few thousand year before brits. Most of the language probably spread due to trade and cultural exchange for example no one implies it was all done by loot and rape and pillage. And we believe they probably learned chariot from interracting with mesopotamia.

Nations move cultures interract mr indian, again your fucked up theory is only believed in india and no there is no grand white european conspiracy.

>To me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar.

>a minority
>haplogroup r1a/r1b

pick one

>71 genes
>requiring a large base population to disperse

It's another "retard doesn't understand haplogroup and thinks it's a synonym for ethnicity" episode

Seems legit if you dig through the old literature. The real question is when was it 'disproven'. All I ever see is the statement that the racial theories were debunked or it is implied they were wrong but I havn't seen any of the proof.

Supposedly the upper caste was the only one that was Aryan, and this race ruled over the poo in loos and gave them civilization.

Its interesting too because it looks like that is what will happen in the americas.

The whites still have all the power in the senate and all the economic superiority over the other races despite their fast shrinking decline in % of the population.

Not him, but can you explain haplogroups to me?

4000-1000bc right here.
They were supreme gentlemen.
Caucasians/whites ranged from the Hun in Manchuria to the Gyptian kangz to the Jews. Just cause their Urheimats varied doesn't mean they weren't basically part of the same bloc.

Used to track paternal and maternal migrations.

Mexicans have Spanish paternal haplogroups and native maternal haplogroups.

He's Persian

Okay, but what do they represent? Is it phenotypical characteristics? Gene mutations?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jafri
>Jafri (Arabic: جعفری ) is a surname commonly associated with those who are the descendants of the 6th Imam, Ja'far al-Sadiq, who was a direct descendant of Ali and Muhammad. Since the Jafri clan trace their lineage to Fatima Az-Zehra, they are a form of Sayyed who are the direct descendants of Muhammad.
>Notable people with the surname Jafri
>Jonathan Aryan Jafari, known as JonTron (born 1990), American comedian, internet personality, and video game critic
A proud Arab of noble stock.

Almost nothing. Some very minor health related things, particularly the maternal haplogroups.

They are just used to see what group intermixed into another and with what level of gender bias.

They also invented segregation (at least the earliest written laws of it), separating India into colours, although they likely practiced the same thing in Egypt since the Egyptians had red hair (recessive).
Sadly, the lure of dark women proves too much. We keep trying to make babel, and stronger, more northern snowniggers take over/destroy everything. We are only as strong as we need to be.

Alright, thanks.

Not him but the "Aryan Invasion theory" is just that, a theory. It's nothing more than a tentative hypothesis based on linguistics.

There is literally no material or archeological evidence of the Aryans moving into India. You can't ridicule skepticism when you're on shaky ground yourself.

Secondly, the founder of Hindu nationalism (Savarkar), believed the AIT, so your accusation of Hindu nationalists being synonymous with rejecting the Aryan invasion is wrong.

Also, there are plenty of Europeans/Americans who have questioned the theory, purely on scholarly grounds, without any politics involved, so it is by no means solely a Hindu nationalist phenomenon.

"Aryan Invasion" just sounds kooky and abstract to modern people since that's the kind of nonsense /pol/ spouts.

There actually was an invasion which implanted an Indo-Aryan language over the land, whether you deny this or not has no bearing on the reality of it happening.

Another reality you have to deal with is that the upper castes like Brahmins have more paternal ancestry from the steppe than the rest of the population.