Did 6 million really die? Or was it just a Zionist lie?

Remember that time stormshills got BTFO on Veeky Forums?

What is this? A source for ants?

Keep in mind, 'Poland' at the time included a big chunk of what is today Ukraine (and a few little parts of other countries). In fact, this was the Jewish Pale, which in Czarist times was the only place Jews were permitted to live. Generally speaking at least -- Jews could always convert to Christianity to get out, rich secular/non-practicing Jews could buy their way out, or could also join the army to get out, and special permission could be got to move to other cities, but these permissions were also undone in a fickle way sometimes...

Zionists wouldn't care if 500 died of the flu. The Levant is Jewish land because muh special snowflake syndrome. The holocaust is just self-fulfilling prophecy excuses to help justify Zionism, which is older than Hitler.

No. There literally weren't that many Jews in Europe. It was actually a Soviet lie, corroborated by the western powers, to make Germany pliant and cement a new moral and political hegemony, by making nationalism into a boogeyman.

>There literally weren't that many Jews in Europe.

Wrong. Not only do international records prove you wrong, but the nazis own records show that there were 11 million jews in europe

prorev.com/wannsee.htm

> It was actually a Soviet lie

The first reports of it were from the Polish government and the Polish Resistance. You know, the guys who hated the soviets and were fighting them off?

About 1.5 million Jews died, long with other political prisoners and such. But the cause was not gassings or whatever.

It was starvation and typhus caused by the allied bombing of Germany's railroads.

The einsatzgruppen in the east weren't murdering people either, they were dealing with partisans.

That's the reality of it.

If hitler had wanted to kill Jews he'd have started in 1933 not 1943.

QUESTIONS FOR DENIERS

1) How much money did Steven Spielberg personally make off his movie "Schindler's List?"

2) Why would a historian of Jewish origin (Gerhard L. Weinberg) take the trouble to find, translate and publish Adolf Hitler's unpublished sequel to Mein Kampf, the "Zweites Buch"? And if you consider it a propagandistic move by "the holocaust industry", why have so few people heard about this book?

3) If the Anne Frank story is a hoax, why did the storytellers give her a very revisionist death (transferred AWAY from Auschwitz, to die later of typhus in Bergen Belsen) rather than symbolically attributing this innocent life's demise to the gas chambers? Why needlessly complicate the story and diminish its climax? Unless of course, the story of Anne Frank is not a story at all, but reality which is told exactly the way it happened.

4) Why did so many Nazi officials carry cyanide pills with them?

5) Why did so many Nazi officials commit suicide upon capture by western Allies, often involving said cyanide pills?

6) Why did Hitler, Göbbels, Himmler and several other high ranking Nazis commit suicide, often even before capture, if they had nothing to hide? If it was merely because they were afraid of what might be done to them at the hands of the Allies, then was their belief in martyrdom as innocents so non-existent?

7) Why does the overwhelming majority of holocaust deniers today and in the past consist of civilians unaffiliated to the NSDAP rather than the once convicted Nazis themselves, or their descendants, or organizations like ODESSA?

8) Even if Hitler and friends were right about International Jewry all along, how does it justify the mass deportation of Polish Jews, most of whom were poor, uneducated and in no way related to any rich Wall Street capitalists? How do you justify laying blame on an entire people, for alleged actions of a tiny few? Answering this question with a question (Japanese internment camps) is evasion and not a valid answer.
Using a sensationalist newspaper headline (Judea Declares War on Germany) which even National Socialists themselves did not take all too seriously, to justify the incarceration of an entire people as a logical reaction, is also not a valid answer.

9) Speaking of, give us proper elaboration of exactly what evils the aforementioned Wall Street capitalists of Jewish origin actually did? Or are you going to attribute something as mundane as inflation or financial depression to "the Jew"? If you want to bring up Black Tuesday, the Wall Street crash of 1929, kindly deliver proof it was all organized by International Jewry.

10) And why on earth do you keep bringing a proposed (perhaps even partially enacted) economic boycott in 1933 as legitimate casus belli to incarcerate an entire people most of whom didn't even take part in it? Again, pointing out to Japanese internment camps is a classic example of whataboutism, rather than answering the question.

11) Why are there no movements in the West to deny other genocides in history, such as the Rwandan genocide where 800,000 people were killed in around 3 months (that's 8,888 people per day!), or the Stalinist purges, the Holodomor, or Mao's Great Leap forward? How are all those death tolls historians provide accepted without question, why arent almanac comparisons made, census data questioned, official documents alleged to be forgeries, eyewitnesses dismissed with a casual hand-wave and so on?

12) Why don't revisionists attack the 50-60 million total death toll of WW2 in the same way they attack the Jewish death toll? Can anyone break this number down to the sum total of all casualties sustained in all battles fought and how many civilians died in which city during which year? And if that's not possible, then why accept this number without much question while writing volume after volume of why only the Jewish death toll is a hoax and at the same time claim you aren't fueled by antisemitism?

13) If your theory about Allied bombing destroying the infrastructure of Germany to the extent that it worsened the situation of concentration camp detainees when it came to supplies is correct, why don't you provide a SINGLE credible, independently verifiable case where a concentration camp's food supply was directly affected by allied bombing to the extent that for example the rail lines leading to it were destroyed, and therefore supplies could no longer reach the camp properly? I can wait.

14) Since many concentration camps were equipped with delousing facilities, why does the prussian blue staining only appear in Auschwitz, Majdanek and Stutthof? Why dont Dachau or Mauthausen's delousing facilities show this coloration? Why isn't HCN = PB staining common knowledge among chemists? Why isn't there any chemist on the planet, apart from Germar Rudolf, who can theorize how much PB should form on a concrete wall per hour of it being exposed to HCN?

15) Prove to me that nowhere close to 3 million Jews lived in Poland in the years leading up to WW2, and THEN we can have a discussion about numbers.

Post full image.

...

Danke.

>nothing but strawmen and other fallacies
I'm half convinced another /pol/ack made it to troll /pol/.

The heads of the SS when tried have the number six million as how many jews they killed. Why would men on their death row lie?

this

Norman "Zionist Lies Dropping Like Flies" Finkelstein

this strikes me as the most plausible explanation. The gas chambers have been pretty much debunked already. I don't think there was any kind of plan for extermination either.

yes and may we never forget such a travesty

>The gas chambers have been pretty much debunked already
>
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html

...

More Slavs died by German extermination than Jews, Gypsies, German cripples and gays combined.
Poles, Serbs, Russians.

Here is the original for those interested.

>11
Wew lad, have you ever been to turkey?

W-we just relocated 1,500 Armenians to a holiday camp in Syria.

>convert.

that's why the nazi's were so fucking retarded.

they didn't care if you converted, they had some batshit idea about genetics.