Can we all agree on this?

Can we all agree on this?

Ballista a best

You dont tear walls down with ballistas.

Looks like a bitch to setup.

trebuchets are for overcompensating manlets

Those siege weapons are for different purposes.

Why didn't the Roman military invent counterweight trebuchets?

Spoon catapults never existed in history.

Go back to /v/.

they were called onagers

Those catapults never existed in real life.

Look at the picture, its not what OP posted

Sure they did

Because their enemies didn't tend to build large stone castles.

They used ramps and towers then fuggen charged within the walls, no fucks given

I'd rather have 300 of these than 10 trebuchet

>Point target artillery

Yeah, just large stone walls.

Let me guess, you also believe fire arrows and dual wielding didn't exist?

>>>/reddit/r/trebuchetmemes

Can that thing launch boulders, corpses or flaming sand over 300 metres?

>ywn be a royal princess, having a bath and suddenly get hit by a trebuchet projectile as it crashes through the stone and mortar of your tower.

flaming sand?

Probably something he saw in a video game

treacherous threw thermal payloads all the time, as did spoon shaped catapults (they're called mangonels). I don't know what youtube historian you guys watch to get your info, but they sound pretentious.

>trebuchets