can someone redpill me on the august 1st thing?
Can someone redpill me on the august 1st thing?
Luis Morris
Luke Barnes
(((core))) vs chinks unlimited. both have their own motives - $$$$$$$$
Jackson Young
>Can someone spoon feed me?
Do you own research like every other fag on this board, holy shit
Adam Gomez
that's not what redpill me means
Julian Brooks
Pretty much this
Chase Diaz
Bitcoin scaling debate. Will the consensus be soft fork on the same chain or a hard fork to new chain? A hard fork would be how etc came from eth. ETC is the original ethereum blockchain, ETH is the chain that came from the hard fork and restored most of the stolen DAO funds. As you can see a hard fork doesn't necessarily mean something bad will happen. At the moment miners have an over 80% consensus for Segwit2x which isn't the same as the Segwit proposal. Segwit2x would actually require a hard fork and it's currently looks like that will happen. Hard to know though.
Noah Perry
both likely sceanrios are soft forks, one is just miner activated and the other is user activated
Jeremiah Gonzalez
Roger "Soros" Ver + Jihad Wu + PsyOPS Craig Wright + CIA agent Gavin Andresen want to raise the blocksize so people can't run full nodes.
Chase Reed
this
looks like we're experiencing the /biz intelligence crash of 2017
Henry Jenkins
how much will the costs increase?
Ryan Roberts
Core is completely open source, not some jewish conspiracy, you pol retards. If you were smart you could contribute to core today, but of course that thought is just silly.
Leo Rivera
There will be no hardfork. As you should know, if a hardfork happens, people get the same amount of coins on both chains. No bitcoin OG whale supports a hardfork. Mircea Popescu alone is powerful enough to crush any attempts of a hardfork by dumping 1 billion dollars worth of BTC on the forked chain. Roger and co will soon go bankrupt if they are stupid enough to hardfork.
Charles Lewis
This discussion goes since 2014. Core had traken over bitcoin refence client, main core devs are paid by AXA. They refuse to increase the blocksize, instead a segwit is pushed by them. Etc.
Nolan Brooks
>Jihad Wu
In your opinion, who's a bigger scammer mongrel degen, Puterin or Jihad?
Can we draw parallels between those two idiots as "Jobs vs Gates" aka leeching unoriginal sociopath faggots who were allowed to get away with stealing other peoples smarts and efforts?
Aiden Sanders
Segwit2x is actually a different third proposal that would, it would require a hard fork from my understanding and postpone the August 1st date to November 18th if everything goes as scheduled.
medium.com
Lucas Wilson
They will start with 2MB, then they will quickly go to 8, which is pretty much game over already for regular people to run nodes. They want to take away the power of running full nodes.
bitsonline.com
Do some research on Craig Wright. You are witnessing pure cold war for the control of the future global money supply.
Landon Peterson
a hardfork is nothing terrible if planned carefully. See monero.
Jordan Roberts
>regular people to run nodes
Please explain what does "regular people running nodes" mean, in practical terms.
Cooper Moore
>Core is completely open source, not some jewish conspiracy,
>main core devs are paid by AXA. They refuse to increase the blocksize, instead a segwit is pushed by them
How do I ensure I get both coins if it happens? Which wallet specifically do I need?
Wyatt Myers
"Core" is a decentralized group of people. "Core" can't increase the blocksize you dumb cuck, this is not central banking. A hardfork requires 100% consensus or else is trash.
Go back to /r/btc.
Xavier Rivera
The question at hand was asking about August 1st. Both bip 148 and segwit2x will cause a soft fork around August 1st to activate segwit. Segwit2x locks in a hard fork in November as well, but there is plenty of time between august and November to amend that plan (another UASF, for example). We can safely say right now we are getting a SF ~Aug. 1st (UA or MA, not sure, but likely MA) and then we will have a blocksize debate after that occurs
Carson Barnes
Look I follow MP and read Trilemma daily. I agree he could probably crush the hard fork attempts. But Segwit2x as I understand it will require a hard fork. medium.com
Benjamin Allen
How much more will it cost?
Evan White
>"Core" is a decentralized group of people. "Core" can't increase the blocksize you dumb cuck, this is not central banking. A hardfork requires 100% consensus or else is trash.
>Go back to /r/btc.
acid much? Junkie
Owen Jones
>monero
Nobody gives a shit about altcoins. Let's see how well monero hardforks once it's as relevant as BTC.
Look at the ETH/ETC clusterfuck for reference.
Juan Gonzalez
t. doesn't know what it means
Jack Morris
>Let's see how well monero hardforks once it's as relevant as BTC
btc could had a HF back in 2015, yet it was delayed by core.
I have no idea why miners are sleeping. They equipment will be useless once majority of transactions is offchain.
Logan Sanchez
Let's see if miners still want to mine on a chain that has a collapsing price.
Jayden Foster
Lightning Network transactions need to be mined too dummy.
Also research shown that 2MB wasn't safe, simple as that. After segwit it wasn't needed.
A see a proper HF in the future that contains more stuff than just 1MB increase.
Adam Bennett
I'm right there with you.
Jayden Russell
so if they make a bitcoin plus and bitcoin classic which ones the better investment?
Josiah Allen
Enough of this nerd talk.
what should I buy/hold?
Jordan Gutierrez
Noob here. How can I take advantage of August 1st events?
Henry Scott
buy high sell low
Cooper Butler
Litecoin
Evan Martin
Ive been saying this for a long time. LTC is way undervalued and has its shit together
Julian Murphy
Btc if it forks, so you double your money
Ryder Clark
when BTC forks and segwit happens, won't LTC die?