What the FUCK was his problem? And how can we prove him wrong...

What the FUCK was his problem? And how can we prove him wrong? He BTFO'd the 2000 years of philosophy that came before and after him.

I thought Wittgenstein was teh one who solved philosophy

>dude nothing matters lmao, just be yourself, selfishness is good

wow, really profound.

Tell me this then, how is deciding what is or isn't a spook not an arbitrary value judgment?

tell me how I know you didn't read him.

Its pretty fucking easy if you read the book, but it doesn't matter if it is arbitrary because I am the unique one.

an easy way to get past stirner is reading the stoics or schopenhauer

How do the stoics help one get past Stirner? Nietzsche has already finished off stoicism.

MEEEEEEEE MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I'M UNIIIIQUE

I AM THE PROTAGONIST! LOOOOOK!
COME ON COME ON LOOOOOK

t. cuck

>He doesn't think highly of himself.

>it's this easy to trigger spooktards

>be cuckold
>post on /pol/ about being a cuckold
>hehe triggered

Marx BTFO of him way back when. Why do people still take him seriously after the ass raping good ol' Marx gave him?

What the FUCK was his problem? And how can we prove him wrong? He BTFO'd the 2000 years of philosophy that came before and after him.

Marx wrote very well against a complete strawman of Stirner who argued things that the real Stirner never did.

How could a continental btfo philosophy when continentals don't practice philosophy?

This is Veeky Forums you retard. Go back to your containment board.

he is wrong because

Collectivism > Individualism

>And how can we prove him wrong?
Be like , and completely misunderstand what he written

Can't him collectivism without individualism as a motivator.

Everything we do is for the benefit of ourselves. Even when we do good deeds despite being fucked over.

this