>muh glorious international empire
>muh white man's burden
>muh civilisation
>muh civic nationalism
>muh sun never sets
*empire fails*
>REEEEE BROWN PEOPLE GET OUT
Why is it okay when white peopke conquer other people's countries using seditious means but not okay when brown people conquer white people's countries using seditious means?
Other urls found in this thread:
dailymail.co.uk
twitter.com
Because the in-group you belong to are always good Boyz who dindu nuffin.
>why are people ok with fucking others over for their own profit but not ok with others fucking over them for their profit
are you SERIOUSLY asking this stupid question
Despite claiming to love history and the classical tradition, these people never seem to realize that they're nostalgic for an era that never existed.
Powell was against the empire so I don't get why you're posting a pic of him.
Brown people aren't conquering shit, it's just idiotic white people letting them him.
*in
hey, I was let in because I applied for a job and was selected based on my work experience. It's purely transactional.
Still, you were let in, I was only objecting to the idea that brown people are conquering anything. The only thing pakis are conquering at this moment is the world guinness record for being inbred.
Technically I was let in because by job requires me to be on site.
but yeah, I see your point.
Because white people bring civilisation
Browns just bring shit
>Powell was against the empire so I don't get why you're posting a pic of him.
Fuck off, retard, the guy literally learned Urdu with ambitions to eventually hold positions in India.
>Fuck off, retard,
No, you.
The guy literally said so in his own book.
How am I supposed to know that all of those people are "shit"? What if all those people are all honest hard workers with a moderate attitude? It's not like I'm seeing thugs in that picture.
Am I supposed to hate them only because they're all black?
>Yet another whiny anti-Anglo thread
Fuck this garbage board.
The book I'm talking about here is "Freedom and reality".
Powell was so anti-empire he wanted the Commonwealth dismantled you fucking mongoloid. He made high Tories look like Cecil Rhodes.
what do you mean by seditious?
>Why is it okay when white peopke conquer other people's countries using seditious means but not okay when brown people conquer white people's countries using seditious means?
Ok don't be surprised when english Hitler rises to purge his homeland from the invaders and traitors who allowed them in.
So you acknowledge Europe is being invaded currently.
He was obviously asking it rhetorically you dumbass.
>Powell was so anti-empire he wanted the Commonwealth dismantled you fucking mongoloid. He made high Tories look like Cecil Rhodes.
He was an an extremist that always took extreme positions.
He loved the Empire and his life's ambition was to be the Viceroy of India, when India was granted independence he threw a massive hissy fit and completely changed his views and wanted the whole Empire dismantled, like a fucking toddler really.
The same way he pioneered bringing in Indian doctors to work in the NHS and then when an anti-racism law was passed that he didn't like just flipped his shit and did the whole "Rivers of Blood, kick them all out" speech.
>Why is it okay when white peopke conquer other people's countries using seditious means but not okay when brown people conquer white people's countries using seditious means?
because white people bring civilization and build shit while brown people just come and take up gibsmedats while raping women and beating up any white cuck unfortunate enough to wander on throw their little pissing grounds.
And the thing is, this isnt even just an edgy joke, its 100% true and you faggots know it.
He was a sith lord.
>Colonialism was terrible
>Why are you complaining when we do it to you?
So you're saying two dumb ideas make for a positive future?
>Am I supposed to hate them only because they're all black?
Yes, that was the objective of the maneuver.
it's still a fucking retarded question
Two wrongs don't make a right, but it seems that these days they do make a left.
Just look at crime and terrorism of White France vs Black France. Low social trust, high economic burder on social services etc. there are a multitude of ways you can measure the negative impact of diversity.
t. Reginald Farworthington
t. Patrick O'McDougall
Topkek, he was an isolationist
civic nationalism has nothing to do with race tho, it's about citizenship loyalty
>mass immigration of a few millions is conquering a continent of 500millions
you iz retarded ma niggah
>Topkek, he was an isolationist
What the user said was factually accurate.
His lifetime ambition was to be Viceroy of India and he learned Urdu as part of trying to reaching that goal, he became and extreme isolationist when India became independent, the same as a small child throwing a tantrum because they didn't get what they wanted.
I suppose you could merely admit that this frame looks all the worse by their simply being in it.
and the high burden of SS doesn't have anything to do with an aging population?
Not everyone shares this view.
>the same as a small child throwing a tantrum because they didn't get what they wanted
It's a good thing you pulled this psychological profile fresh out of your asshole or who knows what his motivation may have really been.
>Ehy senpai, just raped and killed your mother, daughter, son and granpa after I shitted on your bed, I left you a ferrari in the garage tho you stupid nigger so don't say anything bad about me
more like
>set your house on fire so you can collect the insurance.
t. never been to Paris or around Africans
>Wanting to become the bitch of unruly beaners who will go so low as to sell their mother for money or drugs without thinking of adverse effects to the country or the well being of their people
At least white's interest extend beyond tiny shinny round objects.
Why is Mosley, a prominent National Socialist, picked as the stereotypical anti-Aryan Anglo? Churchill was far more vitriolic to the Germans.
Because the original meme came from some german turk who didn't know who mosley was
>National Socialist
Wasn't he a fascist actually?
>civic nationalism has nothing to do with race tho, it's about citizenship loyalty
Why should British non settler colonials be loyal to an empire that's fucked them so hard and would do anything to throw them under the bus for a quick buck?
Pakistan aren't inbred though.
>Why is it okay when white people conquer other people's countries using seditious means but not okay when brown people conquer white people's countries using seditious means?
translated
>Why is it okay when brown peopke conquer other people's countries using seditious means but not okay when white people conquer white people's countries using seditious means?
Its called tribalism. Why are white people so ethno-masochistic? Is it autism?
Why do they keep believing that multiculturalism is gift and not a burden? Even more autism?
Why do you post like that it screams of "I just discovered Veeky Forums and I am 12".
>Why do you post like that that it
get out and learn how to speak english
Because it isn't in our interest to have white lands over run by feral hordes of niggers. Have you seen what a place like Zimbabwe is like? Do you want that in any place in europe or north america?
>a prominent National Socialist
The man was a fascist, and despised Hitler.
>japan
still a high trust society despite its problem
why should people larp about shit that happened long before their lifetime?
unironically this
godbless that turkposter tho
Did he? Do you have proof of that? Because I think Lady Mosley visited Hitler once or twice and quite liked him.
I can't remember where I read it, but I could swear that Mosley dismissed Hitler as an upjumped sergeant, particularly compared to Mussolini.
>Studies have shown that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins - and in Bradford, this rises to 75 per cent
Wasn't he pro-irish unification when it was a very unpopular thing to do as well?
>first cousin
Wow, it's fucking nothing.