Islamic India

How hard were they cucked?

How much of cultural impact on India?

Even many city names retain Islamic names.

Notable Examples:

Allahabad
>was Prayag

Ahmedabad
>was Karnavati

Hyderabad
>was Bhagyanagar

>How hard were they cucked?
Their most famous landmark is an Islamic tomb for one

Where are you getting those numbers though

Not very

Hinduism is so absolutely versatile that it's extremely difficult to destroy

The "Muslim" Indians maintained the caste system, replaced rituals based on the sages with muslim saints, continued to worship the devas "B-But Shiva is TOTALLY JUST AN ANGEL GUISE!", and focused more on union with Allah himself as the supreme soul rather than just being the slave of a cosmic Semitic bully

Most modern "Indian architecture" is just Persian architecture from Mughal time.

Dravida and Orissa is based though

Mughal architecture was a blend of Indian and Persian styles

Native Indian architecture seems quite different...

...

That style looks familiar...

...

>lose the whole Aryavarta to muslims
>take buckets of earth and try to ritually move it into southern india

well they were connected on a cultural level with SE Asia from pre-ice cap melt times so it's not a big surprise

No shit.

Southeast Asia was part of Bharata.

Pic related is Prambanan Indonesia.

India should return to it's roots desu

Why is Indian aesthetic so gaudy? they're piling up too much stuff until it looks like a mess

There's many ancient Indian styles

Domes, courtyards, geometric patterns based on the mandala, towers, and sculpture are typical traits

They used to be painted too, which looked even worse.

Shits lit senpai.

I don't think Southeast Asian temples were colored were they?

I know Angkor had red walls with gold on the prangs.

The bas releifs also had color and some were golden too

>80 million

That's not enough.

That does look cool. What where they used for? Temples ? Doubt those are ordinary buildings maintanence must be a pain in the ass

>80 million Hindus were killed
so?

Yeah they were colored

I don't really get historians that don't like things the way they actually would have looked

The term Indochina exists for a reason.

They called it East India back then.

Recall the East India company?

Also
Indonesia is literally Greek for Island India lol

It's all a cluster fuck anyway. I always thought East India was based around the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia while Indochina was based around Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and so on.

There is no distinct 'Indian' style

>Their most famous landmark is an Islamic tomb for one
For Westerners for some reason. There are plenty of other native, Hindu landmarks with just as much history but the Taj Mahal is a world known tourist catchbait so it's our most famous one.

...

Historically this is true.

But now Indian nationalism is using Mughal architecture as default

They would have looked something like that but how can you be sure they looked exactly like that? There is a danger things might be lost if you start painting things over.

This REEEEEEEEEE. Why do people love to generalize multiple cultures into one generic blob. It's not like China/South Korea/Japan where the latter two are are directly derived from the original and are near identical.

What one ethnicity shaped their temples and buildings could be vastly different to another ethncity a few dozen km away.

This too.

>Indian nationalism
You mean hindu nationalists senpai. And
>hindu nationalists
>having a brain

>For Westerners for some reason.
Because of Mughal architecture is more aesthetically pleasing and familiar to Westerners since Islamic architecture shares a lot of Roman influence.