Octavian vs Mark Antony

Who would you have sided with?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Vipsanius_Agrippa
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Octavian clearly. Anthony was more interested in having power than using it.

>soldier with little political competence
>politician hand picked by Ceasar
Gee I fucking wonder

Anthony.

Octavian was a punk kid that got lucky, 99/100 Anthony wins.

>brave soldier chad with huge experience of conquest and administration as Caesar's lieutenant
>literal who twink who hides in swamps during battles and let's based Antony do all the work and kills children
hmmm, really makes you think....
>b-but he was handpicked by Caesar!!!
Yes, but Caesar didn't expect to get killed when Octavian was still a boy. He obviously planned to mentor Octavian first.
Therefore Antony is the clear choice.
>b-but Ovatvian defeated Antony!!!
Wrong again, Octavian let Agrippa do all the hard work.
Also, it was a naval battle, not a proper battle.

Did Antony plan to make himself emperor?
If not i think its a pretty easy choice

>Agrippa beat Anthony
>Agrippa chose Octavian
Clearly Octavian is the better choice.

t.Cleopatra

Agrippa was a cunning warrior, but he was also a good friend.
Octavian got lucky Agrippa was one of the few people to ignore his autism

>Octavian
>autism
Rome HBO was cool but not very historically accurate user.