Question:
Do you guys think it's predominately ideology that changes the world, or material circumstances?
Question:
Do you guys think it's predominately ideology that changes the world, or material circumstances?
Nature changes the world. In terms of its vehicles, rising cultures.
And ideology is a result and part of the meeting of mind and nature called religion. The calling to complete something that compels men to build, and once having built, causes them to lapse into easy living and weakness, with no mission, and finally resource depletion, social distinction and giving up.
Literally none of you answered my question.
its both user
i think its obvious why
you cant think about something you have no knowledge of
It's quite the chicken and egg question, but I'm inclined to say material circumstances.
Ideology ALWAYS comes after the needs.
"Erst das Fressen, dann die Moral!" B. Brecht
Whoever tells you otherwise will also believe in sky fairies.
Reason I'm asking is that people tend to confuse cause and effect in a lot of social situations.
Take for example feminism. On the Right, feminism is blamed for destroying the nuclear family, but is that really true?
Isn't it way more likely that what destroyed the nuclear family was the need for capitalist societies to grow, and hence needed more labor?
Material circumstances before ideology. Absolutely every time.