Were human rights a mistake?

Were human rights a mistake?
Are human lives overrated?
At what point does a human live loses its valour? if that's even possible.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/TWfph3iNC-k
secretsurvivorsofbamn.wordpress.com/2016/08/19/who-is-yvette-felarca/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Were human rights a mistake?
>Are human lives overrated?
What about the world today gives you the impression that human life in general is rated highly at all?

Human rights are bullshit

Someone gets shot by a cop and riots spark up
Children die in the middle east and the whole region is set on fire
Death penalty is under a negative view
People are still throwing money at African tribes

There is also the fact that we can't outright execute those who are clearly damaging society without doubt and instead are later added to the chain of leeches that live off it. The norm is that human lives are precious and we are not allowed to take them lightly (in public) or we are heading to a slippery slope

Human rights are a noble idea but much more complicated than you would think in practice.
I also think Burke was right when he questioned the entire idea of a universal "human" identity, at least in the legal sense:
>In the famous law of the 3rd of Charles I, called the Petition of Right, the parliament says to the king, "Your subjects have inherited this freedom", claiming their franchises not on abstract principles "as the rights of men", but as the rights of Englishmen, and as a patrimony derived from their forefathers. Selden and the other profoundly learned men who drew this Petition of Right were as well acquainted, at least, with all the general theories concerning the "rights of men" as any of the discoursers in our pulpits or on your tribune; full as well as Dr. Price or as the Abbe Sieyes. But, for reasons worthy of that practical wisdom which superseded their theoretic science, they preferred this positive, recorded, hereditary title to all which can be dear to the man and the citizen, to that vague speculative right which exposed their sure inheritance to be scrambled for and torn to pieces by every wild, litigious spirit.

They are the perfect pretex for any entity to butt in foreign politics
god bless bleeding hearts

>Were human rights a mistake
No they are inherent within us
>Are human lives overrated
They are in fact underrated.
>At what point does a human live loses its valour? if that's even possible.
Rebellion is an affirmation of not only your rights but the rights of your enemies. Human lives always matter.

>Were human rights a mistake?

You ask about something which only described conceptually and forced by artificial mechanics.
Where something doesnt exist objectively and not inherited by nature and doesnt have non-civilized basis, how can you tell if it was a mistake itself or wasnt just fortunate/unfortunate outcome of modern civilization and culture which are themselves extremely arguable.

>Are human lives overrated?

In a fact human live doesnt worth a penny. Just get muh feels unattached and it will be super obvious.

>At what point does a human live loses its valour? if that's even possible.

At what point it gains its """valour""" is a better question to me.

How did that colour get associated with Stirner anyway?

not sure but red yellow and green are already taken. anarcocommunism capitalism and primativism.