One thing that I never understood about ideologys, religions etc. that belive in a superior master race, world domination and more in general in social darwinism. It's how's that is practial, desirable or even a good thing. What kind of people want to live in a costant state of war? What happens after your race, religion or state defeat others? Nothing, you won and then? I mean I really don't see how this kind of Ideologys and religions would live in a normal or a peace context. Take away that living a costant war is not desirable, but no one ever asked to them self what happens after? >Ok we control the world, we destroyed every other race, we are the strongest and the cooles... Still we are "warriors" without a war now.
And to control the world is totally impossible, so it's just the costant state of war part. Why would someone want to live like that?
And that's why imho communism it's not bad as Nazism or Fascism: When the revolution ends there is actually a plan of peace and stability.
Pls explain is just bugging me
Master Race
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>What happens after your race, religion or state defeat others?
That's literally retarded. That's like saying "why don't you believe in God? What if God comes down to Earth and gives you superpowers, what then?"
World domination has never happened because for vast vast majority of hundreds of thousands of years of human history it was impossible. Real world domination only became possible in the late 19th century AD by European but the specific political circumstances prevented anyone from actually going at it so World War Two is the ONLY real attempt at world domination in all of human history.
Also let's get rid of the implied bullshit before it even begins - white people were NOT the only ones with a superiority complex. Nearly every civilization believed they were the most glorious and most important ones. Chinese literally thought they were center of the world and that everyone else was a dirty barbarian that ought to bow down to them, Arabs oppressed and subjugated the fuck out of Maghrebis and Africans from the moment they met them (famously, in Arabic the word for slave is the same as the word for African) and established a color based hierarchy where Arabs were at the top, then Maghrebis then Africans. And so on and so on.
Well I can't speak for others, but personally as a racist that believes whites are simply the best race, I'd say that's a mischaracterization of what I believe.
I don't believe whites should dominate the world or destroy other races. I believe that when we want to we can do such, but as not only the most powerful race, we also have the greatest empathy for others, and so we've decided that would be cruel, and would rather help other races even to our detriment. This pathological altruism is an evolution of the older idea of the white man's burden to bring civilization to the rest of the world. Sometimes this has admittedly gone awry and been corrupted more sinister, greedy, and base motives.
>white people were NOT the only ones
Never implied m8. I cited nazism and fascism at the end simply because I had those two in mind. When I talked about religion I was Impling Wahhabism
>World War Two is the ONLY real attempt at world domination in all of human history.
Very wrong not only because Hitler didn't actually have the goal of world domination and only had the goal of conquering Eastern Europe, but only forcing a treaty of surrender upon the Western European nations whom he held in higher respect.
But also incorrect because earlier world leaders such as Napoleon, Genghis, and Alexander and several Caesars certainly had the intent to conquer the whole world, even if it wasn't technologically possible. Although I'd say by Napoleon's era it was possible and he definitely and specifically wanted to control a world government.
Also you didn't answer my question ok world domination is impossible so it creates a costant state of war with no resolution, how's that practical
>What kind of people want to live in a costant state of war?
With respect op, perhaps there are men you don't fully understand. When I used to work for the government we had a case in Fresno where a local crew was robbing bars in the area.
After 4 months we couldn't find anyone that the crew had traded with on the streets.
Then, while conducting field interviews on Rialto avenue we came across a child with a $10,000 stack of banded money.
The bandits had been throwing the money away. Maybe they just though the robberies were good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical like money.
They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with.
Some men just want to watch the world burn.
>There is an optimal state for humanity to be in
>we are currently not there because large numbers of inferior humans (africans have an IQ of 85 on average) are a drain on the planet
>if we eliminate the inferior humans humanity as a whole will benefit
Its about optimizing the species there is a reason we kill babies with down-syndrome before they are born, just take that sort of mindset to its logical conclusion.
>Hitler didn't actually have the goal of world domination
He absolutely did. he was going to split Eurasia with Japan for 50 to 100 years and then fight a war with Japan for it and then fight a war with the US for the rest of the world. The entire ideology of the nazis was tied to conquest and winning, there's no way in hell they'd stop with only half of Eurasia.
As for ancient leaders who set out to conquer the world, good for them? I can also set out to become god doesn't mean there is any chance, even minuscule, I'll succeed.
And Napoleon lacked all of Africa and much of Asia. Europeans didn't know precise geography of Eastern, Southeastern and Central Asia until mid to late 19th century. Also Napoleon's France was even worse situation when it came to navy than Hitler's Germany was, there was no way in hell he was invading even GB let alone the rest of the world. Throughout Napoleonic wars the French were never able to even weaken the British naval blockade.
It's not but it's not about practicality. Hubris, egotism and tribalism are core tenants of humans going back to our times as primates. Any civilization which reaches a sufficiently advanced level and which is able to dominate its entire surroundings will see itself as "the master race", that's inevitable and its simple human nature.
>equating Nazism and Fascism with "master race"
I think you mean Zionism and Jews.