>that applies to none of them since the vast majority started from indigenous peoples and north Africa is still a part of Africa.
I'm talking about Phoenicians displacing the numidians to form carthage, the arabs migrating through the conquest of the caliphates, etc
peoples that bring foreign culture to africa by displacing the cultures previously native to the region
>even by
* even upon
Africa and the Amazon aren't even close to being similar.
You still are ignoring the other entities that were pretty big and impactful in Eastern, parts of central and Western Africa.
>We won't ever 100% know within this lifetime.
Of course it did why is this even in doubt unless you have some arbitrary definition on what can be a king or not.
Even then in most places in Northern Africa it was a fusion of the Arab and local popualtion. The Swahili states were islamic and heavily influenced by middle eastern influx but they were obviously Bantu.
>Did Africa have LEGIT kings in the acient times and middle ages?
Sure.
In the same sense that the Irish had kings in ancient times.
I remember one African king was working an auto shop in Europe. He managed his subjects through Skype or something like that. He turned up on the news because he was robbed.
What the fuck is a LEGIT king?
How so.
We are talking about equatorial rainforests here.