Should we tolerate intolerance?

Should we tolerate intolerance?

yes

Should we kill all white "people"?

>You're taking the belief that no one should force their beliefs on anyone else, and forcing it on everyone else!

No

We should be intolerant of tolerance

Only if the intolerance is aimed at destroying the over-arching tolerance.

I mean, people should be allowed to be intolerant as long as it doesn't involve killing, maiming or otherwise hurting people with physical actions.

Speech that conveys intolerance however should be as free as humanly possible.

We should legally tolerate it, but not morally accept it.

>Persuasion is force

As long as any laws are not broken, under freedom of expression, yes.

Voting is violence, friendo.

Were does freedom of speech end and harassment starts?

We should tolerate intolerance, but we should also punish bad argument tactics with public flogging.

Direct threats, political radicalization towards violent activism and prompting to do violence are the line.

This. Making shitty arguments should be a crime

Ancaps are literally kindergarten-tier "intellectuals".
>b-but it would be fees, not taxes!

not an argument

Who defines what counts as "tolerant" an "intolerant"?

tolerate intolerance as long as it's nonviolent/doesnt impact anybody

westboro baptist church is fine, ISIS is not

checked

...

Now that's a flogging

If there exists a power relationship between two groups it is intolerant for the stronger group to advocate for its own self-interest

If you do not tolerate intolerance, then you become intolerant yourself, defeating the whole point of being tolerant.

People will always claim that they are tolerant of others until that one thing they personally can't stand comes up, which is suddenly a special case and just simply intolerable.

1) Create a radical ideology centered around you.
2) People are intolerant of your ideology.
3) Accuse them of being intolerant.
4) Start a tolerance inquisition.

???

Profit! You can now recreate another Taiping Heavenly Kingdom if that's what you want to do.

Hahaha bitches don't know about my social viruses or Hagelian dialectics. They aren't on the cutting edge of advanced memetics and wouldn't know an egregore if they were operating inside of one right now. At this very moment.

Probably never even designed a memeplex

Who cares what somebody believes or says as long as they don't infringe on your rights? Doesn't anyone believe in freedom of speech and expression anymore? Fucking statist cunts. Give a nigga a chance before you lock him up. If he doesn't break the NAP you have no moral reason to oppress him.

>Who cares what somebody believes or says as long as they don't infringe on your rights
agreed completely, I also feel the same way about religious freedom, people are free to preach whatever dumb rules and believe in whatever fairy tales they want so long as they don't try to impose their beliefs on others.

But user brother oppresses brother. It's inherent behavior in children.

You're trying, with emotional appeals, to level all things. So that nothing is above or superior to another thing.

This contradicts the very basics of nature. Even ants take slaves of conquered colonies.

You have to convince the timberwolf WHY he shouldn't eat the elk. He eats the elk simply because he can. It's not personal. He doesn't hate the elk.

It's just weaker.