What Veeky Forums your guys view on anarchy?

What Veeky Forums your guys view on anarchy?

Real anarchy would be pretty comfy desu

Real anarchy was never tried.

That's because it's a fantasy

...

>Augusto Pinochet
>anarchist

Holy shitting balls

>Implying it's about what he did rather than what he represents
Do you even post-modern?

If you're still an anarchist after puberty you're demonstrably a mentally deficient

And what he represents wasn't anarcho-capitalism you braindead fuckhole lmao

>And what he represents wasn't anarcho-capitalism you braindead fuckhole lmao
>what he represents wasn't anarcho-capitalism
>wasn't
Please refer to this question

the invitable end for human politics, that is if we survive long enough

The inevitable end to human politics is a back loop to a caste-based feudal society
It's already begun

Lol no

The end to human politics will likely be convincing the elite of humanity to enter into AI machine bodies so that they can 'live forever lololol' which has been the joke pulled on people like them since the mummies.

>ayyy if you obey us and help our system we will mummify you and you will be reborn later because you DNA is still in tact!

And then they really obeyed.

The elite are desperate for eternal life. Sick for it, it consumes them. And they do retarded shit like cryogenics. And soon downloading into machines.

The father of the D-wave quantum computer is convinced that within 50 years we will have machines that outpace humans in every way. In every way

And he is part of a group convincing gullible elites that they can live forever by downloading themselves. It's the ultimate end game of the real elites who will Sony and finally replace humanity with machine labor.

My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs) – or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy. I would arrest anybody who uses the word State (in any sense other than the inanimate realm of England and its inhabitants, a thing that has neither power, rights nor mind); and after a chance of recantation, execute them if they remained obstinate! If we could get back to personal names, it would do a lot of good. Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people. If people were in the habit of referring to ‘King George’s council, Winston and his gang’, it would go a long way to clearing thought, and reducing the frightful landslide into Theyocracy. Anyway the proper study of Man is anything but Man; and the most improper job of any man, even saints (who at any rate were at least unwilling to take it on), is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit for it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity. And at least it is done only to a small group of men who know who their master is. The mediævals were only too right in taking nolo efiscopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop.

It furthermore occurred to me that, basically, anarchy is in fact the only political position that is actually possible. I believe that all other political states are in fact variations or outgrowths of a basic state of anarchy; after all, when you mention the idea of anarchy to most people they will tell you what a bad idea it is because the biggest gang would just take over. Which is pretty much how I see contemporary society. We live in a badly developed anarchist situation in which the biggest gang has taken over and have declared that it is not an anarchist situation—that it is a capitalist or a communist situation. But I tend to think that anarchy is the most natural form of politics for a human being to actually practice. All it means, the word, is no leaders. An-archon. No leaders.

Communism, being an eminently economic institution, does not in any way prejudice the amount of liberty guaranteed to the individual, the initiator, the rebel against crystallising customs. It may be authoritarian, which necessarily leads to the death of the community, and it may be libertarian, which in the twelfth century even under the partial communism of the young cities of that age, led to the creation of a young civilisation full of vigour, a new springtide of Europe.

The only durable form of Communism, however, is one under which, seeing the close contact between fellow men it brings about, every effort would be made to extend the liberty of the individual in all directions.

Under such conditions, under the influence of this idea, the liberty of the individual, increased already by the amount of leisure secured to him, will be curtailed in no other way than occurs today by municipal gas, the house to house delivery of food by great stores, modern hotels, or by the fact that during working hours we work side by side with thousands of fellow labourers.

With Anarchy as an aim and as a means, Communism becomes possible. Without it, it necessarily becomes slavery and cannot exist.

Understand then all of you, especially the young, that to want to impose an imaginary state of government on others by violence is not only a vulgar superstition, but even a criminal work. Understand that this work, far from assuring the well-being of humanity is only a lie, a more or less unconscious hypocrisy, camouflaging the lowest passions we posses.

Name a successful anarchist society. I'll wait.

Catalonia

Even Orwell mentioned what a disorganized shithole it was

If it's so successful why is it still a part of Spain?

Veeky Forums

None and all (societies). The State and Society are spooks.

Anarchy is the orgy of the will.

You will not have this without absolute sovreignity.

You don't have sovreignity without absolute lethality. Leviathan avoids the prickly fish.

CONT.

>Orgy of the will?

What do you call atoms of desire colliding and breaking out?

Somalia is a real place

Pretty happy my town cuts the grass and maintains the parks for kids. Pretty happy knowing I can call 911 if my house is on fire. Pretty happy I know my house was built to safety standards instituted by the government. Pretty happy town provides clean water right out the tap. Shall I continue?

>not selling home cooked meth to the youth of your community
>not dumping all the poisonous toxic chemicals into the river out back because FUCK the guys downstream
>not surrounding your property with landmines, a small private garrison and attack helicopters
>not taking advantage of the methed up sex crazed local youth to also sell in house created pornography
>and also using them as soldiers in your garrison
>not dropping a micro-nuke on the asshole talking shit about you and trying to ruin your bread and butter

Seriously do you even understand the free market?

...

People who actually want Anarchy are the stupidest people on the earth, stupider than people who want communism.
True Anarchy would last for about 5 minutes before someone swoops in and takes control.
I'm talking about neighboring nations, Warlords, or as simple as the people with lots of guns.
Look at Somolia, the government collapsed, they had some anarchy, but now the whole nation is ruled by Warlords and Pirates.
Wanting anarchy is for edgy teenagers who want to live out the purge/walking dead.

anarchism is supremely retarded and the people who pine for it tend to be terrible

Isn't the system just gonna degenerate into a "tribe warchief" system with local milicias appropriating parts of lands in their name?

Anarchy is for edgy teens btfo.

There will always be disagreements.

It is good as an idea to think about what governments should and shouldn't do, but it is and has always been a completely unworkable system.